Merseyside & Cheshire Cancer Network Dashboard

More documents

Recommendations

Info

3c Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Excellent The PCT regularly reviews TWW activity including yield rates Does not review urgent rates by practice Reviews TWW on a ad hoc basis Reviews TWW and reports findings to PCT Reviews TWW and provides regular reports on efficiency including yield rates Reviews TWW data every quarter and reports on efficiency to PCT, GP and Trust colleagues. Initiatives to improve TWW. Cancer yield rates can be identified (referrals versus actual cancer diagnosis). Equity audits have been completed for the PCT Emergency presentation 3d The PCT can review cancers that have been diagnosed via accident and emergency Level 1 Unable to identify cancers via this route Level 2 PCT is exploring ways to gather this data Level 3 PCTs can identify emergency presentations resulting in a cancer diagnosis Level 4 PCTs can identify emergency presentations resulting in a cancer diagnosis and this is shared with GP practices Level 5 Excellent Self assessment rating PCTs can identify emergency presentations resulting in a cancer diagnosis and this is shared with GP practices. The reasons for emergency presentation are being investigated and performance can be measured on a regular basis How will the PCT improve referrals? Action to be taken Who will lead on the delivery of this action? Identify milestones Version 2 Cancer Dashboard MCCN 2010 12
4. Staging The information for the stage of cancer is essential to help a person choose the best treatment. It also helps them to understand their prognosis. Cancer Registration 4a Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Excellent Self assessment rating Bladder How complete is the clinical stage data for cancers 3 months after registration? Less than 50% and has a system in place to capture staging data (i.e. Somerset) 50%-59% and has a system in place to capture staging data (i.e. Somerset) 60%-79% and has a system in place to capture staging data (i.e. Somerset) 80%-89% and has a system in place to capture staging data (i.e. Somerset) and regularly review staging data 90+% and has a system in place to capture staging data (i.e. Somerset) and regularly review staging data in collaboration with the cancer network and NWCIS Evidence summary: 4b Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Excellent Self assessment rating Bladder How complete is the final stage data for cancers 3 months after registration? Less than 50% and has a system in place to capture staging data (i.e. Somerset) 50%-59% and has a system in place to capture staging data (i.e. Somerset) 60%-79% and has a system in place to capture staging data (i.e. Somerset) 80%-89% and has a system in place to capture staging data (i.e. Somerset) and regularly review staging data 90+% and has a system in place to capture staging data (i.e. Somerset) and regularly review staging data in collaboration with the cancer network and NWCIS Evidence summary: Version 2 Cancer Dashboard MCCN 2010 13
Page 1 and 2: Merseyside & Cheshire Cancer Networ
Page 3 and 4: Baseline key metrics and indicators
Page 5 and 6: Public awareness 1b Has the PCT eng
Page 7 and 8: Operational leadership 2a Does the
Page 9 and 10: Breast cancer screening coverage 2f
Page 11: 3. Delays in presentation/ Referral
Page 15 and 16: 4f Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
Page 17 and 18: 4l Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
Page 19 and 20: How will the PCT reduce cancer mort
Page 21 and 22: 8. Local Plans: Findings from local
Page 23: Cancer Performance summary table fo

Merseyside & Cheshire Cancer Network Dashboard

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?