Stability of GAMMA-NAUGHT and THE PALSAR based FOREST ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Accuracy evaluation of FNF2007-2009 using PALSAR FNF 2007 84.54%, 925points PALSAR FNF 2008 83.02%, 736points PALSAR FNF 2009 82.68%, 635points ●:Forest, ●:Non-Forest, ●:Water ●:Correct, ●:Incorrect PALSAR FNF 2010 83.93%, 280points
iomass estimation(accuracy)(Tier-2~3) Backscattering SAR data Slope corrected Ortho-rectified biomass Lidar data Height measure biomass LULUCF FNF Ground truth data Brest-height-diameter Tree height, Alometry Tree height biomass(accuracy) B = ΔB = ∑b i A i i ∑ i ( ) 2 Δb i A i Estimate the forest biomass and its accuracy Histgram biomass
Page 1 and 2: Stability of GAMMA-NAUGHT and THE P
Page 3 and 4: PALSAR 10m Global Forest/Non-Forest
Page 5 and 6: 5. MRV-system development Time ser
Page 7 and 8: 4. Stability of PALSAR Temporal var
Page 9 and 10: Temporal change of gammanaught(2007
Page 11 and 12: Annual decrease of gamma naught HV
Page 13 and 14: Example-‐2) Tesso Niro natur
Page 15 and 16: 1.Gamma-naught variation and the fo
Page 17 and 18: Comparison study for:LULUCF • Are
Page 19 and 20: Slope correct effect and advantage
Page 21: 5.3 FNF • Target area:Riau • M
Page 25 and 26: S02E133 New Guinea Is. Global Mang
Page 27 and 28: 7. Summary • Slope corrected gamm
Page 29: 5.2 LULUCF Classification • Area:

Stability of GAMMA-NAUGHT and THE PALSAR based FOREST ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?