23.03.2014 Views

SCSN Minutes 2010 11 - The Knowledge Network

SCSN Minutes 2010 11 - The Knowledge Network

SCSN Minutes 2010 11 - The Knowledge Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Interest Groups, the Annual Conference, Fundings, Travel Scholarships, ASME and would be a<br />

useful tool for the membership. It would be called “<strong>SCSN</strong> Bulletin” and when e-mailed out<br />

there would also be a link to the website. In order to get the bulletin out to a wider<br />

audience, members agreed to send this out to their own contacts. LE to draw up a template<br />

and remind members a couple of weeks before the bulletin is due to go out so that<br />

information can be collated. GN felt for a while that it would be good to cast the net wider,<br />

particularly in the medical fraternity, as awareness of the <strong>Network</strong> is not as high as it should<br />

be and he thought that the bulletin could be used as a way of letting people know about the<br />

<strong>Network</strong> – going through the College of Physicians and sending out flyers, etc.<br />

JM had a meeting in the North with Jerry Morse, having a look at the Suttie Centre and they<br />

invited a Service User (Carer), partly because they are having real problems with invasive<br />

procedures and thinking that clinical skills would be useful. Carers get no training and the<br />

Service User was very excited about the whole resource and how it could be used. <strong>The</strong>re are<br />

other groups who may be interested in becoming associated members of the <strong>Network</strong>. GN<br />

thought this was a really good development of our profile and would help to get our<br />

membership more active. GN wanted to clarify invasive procedures and discussion took<br />

place on this and it was suggested that a good way to start this would be to have a workshop<br />

to see what the interest is because you could have a special interest group. JM to contact<br />

Loretta Lamb, director of PAMIS – huge area to provide support in localities to access clinical<br />

skills training or at least start to talk to people. JM to send synopsis about research project<br />

and contact details to GN and LE to circulate to Steering Group.<br />

LE<br />

JM<br />

4. Artist in Residence<br />

GN announced at the Conference, progress in relation to the Artist in Residence – GN and Christine<br />

Borland were putting together a detailed application. If this goes ahead Christine will spend 2 days<br />

a week interfacing with all the Clinical Skills facilities and facilitators in Scotland. If successful with<br />

the application this will start the middle of next year and the end will coincide with the Conference<br />

in Edinburgh.<br />

5. Skills Passport<br />

This was left on the Agenda from the last meeting on the basis that we need to shift this aside. Tony<br />

sent in a Skills Passport he had when he was training but reading through minutes from previous<br />

meetings Jean Ker is actually looking at this nationally and we should let Jean and Tony look at this.<br />

GN did not think this was something that the Group should pursue and will e-mail Tony and advise<br />

him of this.<br />

6. <strong>2010</strong> Conference<br />

Copies of the Feedback forms were distributed and it was decided that even under the<br />

circumstances with the disruption of the fire, the general consensus was that the Conference was a<br />

success. A letter was being sent to Discovery to formally thank them for their assistance that day.<br />

GN thought that the right balance had been found with the Keynote Speakers and the conference<br />

had given people what they wanted. It was agreed that the on-line registration system was a good<br />

idea and worked well in principle. PB would support this idea for next year.<br />

GN<br />

PB asked if the Keynote Speakers had given permission for their talks to be put on the website. LE<br />

said only two had signed permission forms. Other speakers to be contacted to ask if they will give<br />

permission for their talks to go on the website.<br />

CW raised the question of money and now that figures/bills were in, the situation was becoming a<br />

bit clearer. <strong>The</strong> Group has to make £8,500 a year to keep a balance, although there is about<br />

£20,000 in the pot but we don’t want to go into that too much. This year we only made £6,500 and<br />

it is a point to note that we didn’t make a profit. Each year we are losing a little bit more – as we<br />

are now having to pay for venues, this is adding to the costs and we haven’t increased the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!