ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 26 april 2005 at ...
ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 26 april 2005 at ... ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 26 april 2005 at ...
Ordinary Meeting
Ordinary Meeting
- Page 463 and 464: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 465 and 466: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 467 and 468: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 469 and 470: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 471 and 472: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 473 and 474: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 475 and 476: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 477 and 478: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 479 and 480: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 481 and 482: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 483 and 484: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 485 and 486: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 487 and 488: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 489 and 490: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 491 and 492: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 493 and 494: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 495 and 496: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 497 and 498: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 499 and 500: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 501 and 502: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 503 and 504: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 505 and 506: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 507 and 508: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 509 and 510: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 511 and 512: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 513: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 517 and 518: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 519 and 520: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 521 and 522: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 523 and 524: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 525 and 526: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 527 and 528: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 529 and 530: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 531 and 532: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 533 and 534: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 535 and 536: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 537 and 538: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 539 and 540: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 541 and 542: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 543 and 544: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 545 and 546: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 547 and 548: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 549 and 550: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 551 and 552: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 553 and 554: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 555 and 556: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 557 and 558: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 559 and 560: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 561 and 562: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 563 and 564: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
Ordinary Meeting <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Council - <strong>26</strong> April <strong>2005</strong> 21 / 12<br />
<strong>26</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> 30 Marian Street, Killara<br />
Item 21<br />
DA1243/04<br />
18 April <strong>2005</strong><br />
Insufficient geotechnical assessment, pressure <strong>on</strong> existing infrastructure, depth and stability <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
excav<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong><br />
Council’s Engineering Assessment Team Leader, Robin Howard, has reviewed the proposal in<br />
rel<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> proposed excav<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>, geotechnical and infrastructural aspects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the development. Based<br />
<strong>on</strong> this assessment, Mr Howard has determined th<strong>at</strong> the geotechnical and excav<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> aspects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />
proposal are s<strong>at</strong>isfac<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>ry for development approval <strong>on</strong> engineering grounds, subject <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
Such c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s will require geotechnical and hydro geological m<strong>on</strong>i<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>ring, and further pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al<br />
geotechnical input as warranted. Ongoing investig<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> by a c<strong>on</strong>sulting geotechnical engineer will<br />
also <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> required as will dilapid<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> reports for neighbouring properties and infrastructure. (Refer<br />
C<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> No’s 57-75, 88-103, 109-125).<br />
Traffic and parking implic<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>s (vehicle access, traffic flows, parking, driver sight lines, driver<br />
and pedestrian safety, traffic gener<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong><br />
The applic<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> has <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>en reviewed by Council’s Engineering Assessment Team Leader, Robin<br />
Howard, in rel<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> traffic gener<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>, vehicle access and parking. Mr Howard c<strong>on</strong>cludes th<strong>at</strong><br />
adverse traffic issues in the surrounding road network are not anticip<strong>at</strong>ed as a result <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this<br />
development as sufficient <strong>on</strong>-site parking is provided al<strong>on</strong>g with appropri<strong>at</strong>e access <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> and from the<br />
site. (See comments under C<strong>on</strong>sult<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> with Council).<br />
LEP194 requires th<strong>at</strong> the proposal provides a minimum <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 34 car parking spaces, including 7 visi<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>r<br />
car parks. The proposal provides 61 car parking spaces in <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>tal and complies accordingly. Vehicles<br />
will enter and exit the development in a forward movement, with adequ<strong>at</strong>e driver sightlines for both<br />
driver and pedestrian safety. Appropri<strong>at</strong>e <strong>on</strong> site truck access and manoeuvring areas for waste<br />
collecti<strong>on</strong> vehicles is provided, preventing potential traffic c<strong>on</strong>gesti<strong>on</strong> in Caithness and Marian<br />
Streets during waste collecti<strong>on</strong> periods.<br />
Heritage impacts <strong>on</strong> surrounding properties<br />
Council’s Heritage Advisor, Paul Dignam, has reviewed the applic<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> and c<strong>on</strong>cludes th<strong>at</strong> the<br />
heritage provisi<strong>on</strong>s in DCP 55 are s<strong>at</strong>isfied and th<strong>at</strong> the heritage items <strong>at</strong> No’s 33 & 39 Marian<br />
Street will not <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> unduly affected by the proposed development, given their separ<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> distance<br />
from the subject site. Mr Dignam further comments th<strong>at</strong> the heritage item <strong>at</strong> No.1 Caithness Street<br />
is separ<strong>at</strong>ed from the proposed building by 57m, is loc<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>on</strong> the opposite side <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the road and<br />
screened by substantial landscape elements.<br />
Inappropri<strong>at</strong>e Ro<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> structure<br />
The low pitch multi-ridge hip ro<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> has <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>en designed <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> resp<strong>on</strong>d <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> prevailing ro<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> forms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
surrounding dwellings and <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>tribute <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the integr<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the proposed building within the<br />
established streetscape. The upper floor <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the building is setback from the building perimeter,<br />
which reduces the apparent bulk and scale <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the building and the overall size <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the ro<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> structure.<br />
Due <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the setback <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the ro<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>, the upper level ro<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> element will not <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> prominent when viewed<br />
from street level.<br />
N:\0504<strong>26</strong>-OMC-PR-03129-<strong>26</strong> TO 30 MARIAN STREET KI.doc/pseitz/12