ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 26 april 2005 at ...

ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 26 april 2005 at ... ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 26 april 2005 at ...

kmc.nsw.gov.au
from kmc.nsw.gov.au More from this publisher
23.03.2014 Views

Ordinary Meeting ong>ofong> Council - 26 April 2005 20 / 37 1 & 1A Lamond Drive, 1444 & 1444A Pacific Highway, Turramurra Item 20 DA1099/04 13 April 2005 In addition ong>toong> the associated landscape issues raised in Part 4.3 ong>beong>low, a further concern is raised with regard ong>toong> insufficient detail contained in the landscape plan. The site analysis plan shows the retention ong>ofong> only 6 ong>ofong> the 55 trees identified as ong>beong>ing associated with the site, ong>ofong> which three (3) or 50% are located ong>ofong>f site. The trees ong>toong> ong>beong> retained are No’s 382, 383, 426, 428, 436, and 424. Tree No’s 395-419 are part ong>ofong> an existing tree grouping/stand located centrally on site. Given the scale ong>ofong> development, it is not possible ong>toong> retain these trees due ong>toong> their central location. The removal ong>ofong> Tree No. 427 Eucalyptus saligna (Bluegum) misidentified as a Eucalyptus pilularis (Blackbutt) is unacceptable and cannot supported. The tree, which is located adjacent ong>toong> the southern site boundary is in excellent health and condition, has not suffered song>toong>rm damage and is significant within the broader landscape. The tree forms part ong>ofong> the interconnecting canopy that typifies the locality. Part 4.3 Setbacks: The 7 metres setback ong>toong> Lamond Drive and the 72 metres length ong>ofong> the building will create an overong>beong>aring built form in Lamond Drive. The built form will undermine the streetscape setting, by reason ong>ofong> its limited landscaped character; prominence ong>toong> the street boundaries and the cramped arrangement ong>ofong> the structure due ong>toong> the disproportionate distribution ong>ofong> the open space areas compared ong>toong> the existing character ong>ofong> the locality. The already limited scope for landscaping within the 7 metres setback is further reduced by: • the extensive retaining walls required in the setback area due ong>toong> the >5 metres height difference ong>beong>tween street level and ground levels; • the resulting stepped planter boxes (

Ordinary Meeting ong>ofong> Council - 26 April 2005 20 / 38 1 & 1A Lamond Drive, 1444 & 1444A Pacific Highway, Turramurra Item 20 DA1099/04 13 April 2005 The proposal fails ong>toong> maintain a front setback zone ong>toong> the Pacific Highway ong>ofong> 10-12 metres as required by Clause 4.3 C-1 ong>ofong> DCP 55. a) The basement car park and acoustic fence are shown with setbacks ong>ofong> 7.2 metres and 5 metres, respectively. b) The limited scope for landscaping within the reduced setback areas is further reduced by the private courtyards that: • make significant screen planting highly unlikely (within the courtyards) and; • undermine the preservation ong>ofong> a coordinated landscape theme in the long term. A large percentage ong>ofong> the Pacific Hwy site frontage is taken up by private courtyards, leaving a front setback less than 5m as communal open space that is available for large tree replenishment. Eucalyptus saligna (Bluegum) have ong>beong>en nominated within the site frontage in close proximity ong>toong> a proposed front wall. In the long term, this is impractical as the expanding roots from the trees will crack and compromise the integrity ong>ofong> the wall. The proposal will not achieve appropriate separation with properties ong>toong> the north (1446 and 1446A Pacific Highway) due ong>toong> the inadequate side setback and lack ong>ofong> substantial screen planting and canopy trees. A 6 metres setback is proposed ong>beong>tween the terrace/pergola ong>ofong> Unit A11 and the northern boundary (No 1446 Pacific Highway). The 6 metres available for landscaping is reduced by: • A series ong>ofong> retaining walls that create a planter box approx. 1.6 metres wide and 2-3 metres high, • a path (1.2 metres wide) almost stretching the entire length ong>ofong> the rear boundary • in addition 2 metres ong>toong> 3.6 metres ong>ofong> the remaining setback area currently forms part ong>ofong> the concreted area ong>ofong> Kirawa Close. Kirawa Close is a private access road, originally created ong>toong> provide access ong>toong> 5 lots. These lots have reciprocal rights ong>ofong> carriageway over this driveway. The necessary consent has not ong>beong>en provided ong>toong> demolish part ong>ofong> the driveway and replace those areas with landscaping. With or without the above consent, the effective area for deep soil landscaping in the side setback adjacent ong>toong> Unit A11 is greatly reduced. This is not sufficient ong>toong> ensure the establishment ong>ofong> effective landscaping and canopy trees that would screen the adjacent property No. 1446 Pacific Highway or provide appropriate separation. This is especially relevant in light ong>ofong> the fact that No 1446 was not incorporated inong>toong> DA 0077/05 and may end up as an isolated dwelling ong>beong>tween the two high density developments. (Refer Reason for Refusal No 2.6) The development will not maintain the existing character ong>ofong> this area nor appropriately respond ong>toong> the desired future medium density character ong>ofong> the area as envisaged by LEP 194 and DCP 55. Part 4.4 Built form and articulation: N:\050426-OMC-PR-03122-1 1A LAMOND DRIVE 1444.doc/cswanepoel/38

Ordinary Meeting <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Council - <strong>26</strong> April <strong>2005</strong> 20 / 38<br />

1 & 1A Lam<strong>on</strong>d Drive, 1444 &<br />

1444A Pacific Highway,<br />

Turramurra<br />

Item 20<br />

DA1099/04<br />

13 April <strong>2005</strong><br />

The proposal fails <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> maintain a fr<strong>on</strong>t setback z<strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Pacific Highway <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 10-12 metres as<br />

required by Clause 4.3 C-1 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> DCP 55.<br />

a) The basement car park and acoustic fence are shown with setbacks <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 7.2 metres and 5<br />

metres, respectively.<br />

b) The limited scope for landscaping within the reduced setback areas is further reduced by the<br />

priv<strong>at</strong>e courtyards th<strong>at</strong>:<br />

• make significant screen planting highly unlikely (within the courtyards) and;<br />

• undermine the preserv<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a coordin<strong>at</strong>ed landscape theme in the l<strong>on</strong>g term.<br />

A large percentage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Pacific Hwy site fr<strong>on</strong>tage is taken up by priv<strong>at</strong>e courtyards, leaving a<br />

fr<strong>on</strong>t setback less than 5m as communal open space th<strong>at</strong> is available for large tree replenishment.<br />

Eucalyptus saligna (Bluegum) have <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>en nomin<strong>at</strong>ed within the site fr<strong>on</strong>tage in close proximity <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> a<br />

proposed fr<strong>on</strong>t wall. In the l<strong>on</strong>g term, this is impractical as the expanding roots from the trees will<br />

crack and compromise the integrity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the wall.<br />

The proposal will not achieve appropri<strong>at</strong>e separ<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> with properties <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the north (1446 and 1446A<br />

Pacific Highway) due <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the inadequ<strong>at</strong>e side setback and lack <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> substantial screen planting and<br />

canopy trees.<br />

A 6 metres setback is proposed <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>tween the terrace/pergola <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Unit A11 and the northern boundary<br />

(No 1446 Pacific Highway). The 6 metres available for landscaping is reduced by:<br />

• A series <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> retaining walls th<strong>at</strong> cre<strong>at</strong>e a planter box approx. 1.6 metres wide and 2-3 metres<br />

high,<br />

• a p<strong>at</strong>h (1.2 metres wide) almost stretching the entire length <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the rear boundary<br />

• in additi<strong>on</strong> 2 metres <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> 3.6 metres <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the remaining setback area currently forms part <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

c<strong>on</strong>creted area <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Kirawa Close. Kirawa Close is a priv<strong>at</strong>e access road, originally cre<strong>at</strong>ed <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

provide access <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> 5 lots. These lots have reciprocal rights <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> carriageway over this driveway.<br />

The necessary c<strong>on</strong>sent has not <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>en provided <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> demolish part <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the driveway and replace those<br />

areas with landscaping.<br />

With or without the above c<strong>on</strong>sent, the effective area for deep soil landscaping in the side setback<br />

adjacent <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> Unit A11 is gre<strong>at</strong>ly reduced. This is not sufficient <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> ensure the establishment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

effective landscaping and canopy trees th<strong>at</strong> would screen the adjacent property No. 1446 Pacific<br />

Highway or provide appropri<strong>at</strong>e separ<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>. This is especially relevant in light <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the fact th<strong>at</strong> No<br />

1446 was not incorpor<strong>at</strong>ed in<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> DA 0077/05 and may end up as an isol<strong>at</strong>ed dwelling <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>tween the<br />

two high density developments. (Refer Reas<strong>on</strong> for Refusal No 2.6)<br />

The development will not maintain the existing character <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this area nor appropri<strong>at</strong>ely resp<strong>on</strong>d <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

the desired future medium density character <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the area as envisaged by LEP 194 and DCP 55.<br />

Part 4.4 Built form and articul<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>:<br />

N:\0504<strong>26</strong>-OMC-PR-03122-1 1A LAMOND DRIVE 1444.doc/cswanepoel/38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!