ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 26 april 2005 at ...

ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 26 april 2005 at ... ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 26 april 2005 at ...

kmc.nsw.gov.au
from kmc.nsw.gov.au More from this publisher
23.03.2014 Views

Ordinary Meeting ong>ofong> Council - 26 April 2005 20 / 31 1 & 1A Lamond Drive, 1444 & 1444A Pacific Highway, Turramurra Item 20 DA1099/04 13 April 2005 Numong>beong>r ong>ofong> song>toong>reys (max): 6 6 YES (under provision 25K) Site coverage (max): 35% 33% YES Top floor area (max): 60% ong>ofong> 828m 2 or 59% ong>ofong> song>toong>rey ong>beong>low. YES level ong>beong>low Song>toong>reys and ceiling height 6 song>toong>reys and

Ordinary Meeting ong>ofong> Council - 26 April 2005 20 / 32 1 & 1A Lamond Drive, 1444 & 1444A Pacific Highway, Turramurra Item 20 DA1099/04 13 April 2005 This fails ong>toong> satisfy the development standard contained in Clause 25I 1(2) ong>ofong> LEP 194 which requires sites with an area ong>ofong> 1,800m 2 or more ong>toong> have deep soil landscaping for at least 50% ong>ofong> the site area. A SEPP 1 objection has not ong>beong>en submitted ong>toong> justify why it is unreasonable and unnecessary ong>toong> apply the standard in this instance. Accordingly, in the absence ong>ofong> a SEPP 1 objection, Council cannot legally approve the application even it were considered ong>toong> ong>beong> acceptable in this regard, notwithstanding the non-compliance. (See Reason for Refusal No 1.1) Maximum numong>beong>r ong>ofong> song>toong>reys and ceiling height (Clause 25k) Clause 25k allows a concession in height (up ong>toong> an additional 3 metres) and up ong>toong> 1 additional song>toong>rey over not more than 75% ong>ofong> the footprint ong>ofong> the development on sites that have slopes greater than 15%. The proposal satisfies this standard as only 20.6% ong>ofong> the footprint utilises this height and song>toong>rey concession. Residential zone objectives The development fails ong>toong> satisfy the objectives for residential zones as prescriong>beong>d in clause 25D. In particular, the following objectives have not ong>beong>en met: (b) (c) (e) ong>toong> encourage the protection ong>ofong> existing trees within setback areas and ong>toong> encourage the provision ong>ofong> sufficient viable deep soil landscaping and tall trees in rear and front gardens where new development is carried out; ong>toong> provide side setbacks that enable effective landscaping, tree planting ong>beong>tween buildings, separation ong>ofong> buildings for privacy and views from the street ong>toong> rear landscaping, ong>toong> provide built upon area controls ong>toong> protect the tree canopy ong>ofong> Ku-ring-gai, and ong>toong> ensure particularly the provision ong>ofong> viable deep soil landscaping in order ong>toong> maintain and improve the tree canopy in a sustainable way, so that tree canopy will ong>beong> in scale with the built form, The above objectives have not ong>beong>en met due ong>toong>: • The front and side setbacks ong>beong>ing inadequate ong>toong> allow for the replenishment ong>ofong> the tree canopy; (Refer Reasons for Refusal Nos 2.3 and 2.5) • The insufficient amount ong>ofong> deep soil landscaping; (Refer Reason for Refusal No 2.1) • The impact on significant trees; (Refer Reason for Refusal No 3) • The use ong>ofong> the front setback ong>toong> Lamond Drive and the Pacific Highway for courtyard areas and (Refer Reasons for Refusal Nos 2.4 and 2.5) • The length ong>ofong> the front elevation (at 72 metres) without substantial articulation. (Refer Reason for Refusal No 2.2) POLICY PROVISIONS N:\050426-OMC-PR-03122-1 1A LAMOND DRIVE 1444.doc/cswanepoel/32

Ordinary Meeting <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Council - <strong>26</strong> April <strong>2005</strong> 20 / 31<br />

1 & 1A Lam<strong>on</strong>d Drive, 1444 &<br />

1444A Pacific Highway,<br />

Turramurra<br />

Item 20<br />

DA1099/04<br />

13 April <strong>2005</strong><br />

Num<str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>r <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> s<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>reys (max): 6<br />

6 YES<br />

(under provisi<strong>on</strong> 25K)<br />

Site coverage (max): 35% 33% YES<br />

Top floor area (max): 60% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

828m 2 or 59% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> s<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>rey <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>low.<br />

YES<br />

level <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>low<br />

S<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>reys and ceiling height<br />

6 s<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>reys and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!