ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 26 april 2005 at ...

ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 26 april 2005 at ... ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 26 april 2005 at ...

kmc.nsw.gov.au
from kmc.nsw.gov.au More from this publisher
23.03.2014 Views

Ordinary Meeting ong>ofong> Council - 26 April 2005 20 / 21 1 & 1A Lamond Drive, 1444 & 1444A Pacific Highway, Turramurra Item 20 DA1099/04 13 April 2005 ong>toong>p ong>ofong> the frontage kerb ong>toong> prevent inundation ong>ofong> the basement level by flows overong>toong>pping in the gutter system. Geotechnical / Structural Comments In support ong>ofong> the application, the applicant has submitted a “Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation report for Proposed Residential Development, Lamond Drive, Turramurra” (job 10543/1, dated 11 Ocong>toong>ong>beong>r 2004) prepared by Geotechnique. The sub-surface geotechnical investigations (2 boreholes) and subsequent report are considered appropriate for DA assessment purposes on this proposal. The report contains information and recommendations on excavation and construction techniques based on the founding material. Attention is paid ong>toong> protection ong>ofong> the adjace nt property and infrastructure, although a recommendation is made ong>toong> carry out further borehole testing after demolition. In geotechnical matters, Council development assessment engineers are guided by the findings and recommendations ong>ofong> the expert geotechnical report submitted with the Development Application. Based on the geotechnical report submitted for this site, I am in a position ong>toong> conditionally approve the geotechnical aspects ong>ofong> this DA. These conditions will require moniong>toong>ring, construction and further geotechnical design input as specified in the preliminary expert report. Recommendation Based on the formal assessment, Councils Development Engineer has determined that the proposal is satisfacong>toong>ry for development approval, subject ong>toong> Conditions. Heritage Advisor Council’s Heritage Advisor, Mr Paul Dignam, commented as follows: Heritage report A heritage impact statement was provided as part ong>ofong> this application, prepared by Rappoport Heritage Consultants. The report has investigated the site, but has made a few basic errors/omissions. Under heritage items within the vicinity ong>ofong> the subject site, the report fails ong>toong> identify 1379 The Pacific Highway, which is on the opposite side ong>ofong> the highway on the corner ong>ofong> Lowther Park Avenue. The report identifies No 1428 Pacific Highway, which is further ong>toong> the north but on the same side ong>ofong> the subject site. In relation ong>toong> No 1359 Pacific Highway, it incorrectly refers ong>toong> it as the “Cherrywood Nursing Home”. The building was converted ong>toong> strata apartments about 10 years ago and a new wing added. The report also fails ong>toong> mention Urban Conservation Area No 25. The heritage report largely repeats information prepared by Council on the significance ong>ofong> Kuring-gai and has adopted the standard questions developed by the NSW Heritage Council for N:\050426-OMC-PR-03122-1 1A LAMOND DRIVE 1444.doc/cswanepoel/21

Ordinary Meeting ong>ofong> Council - 26 April 2005 20 / 22 1 & 1A Lamond Drive, 1444 & 1444A Pacific Highway, Turramurra Item 20 DA1099/04 13 April 2005 assessing impacts on heritage items. Council has prepared a similar document ong>toong> assist in preparation ong>ofong> impact assessments. Impact on nearby heritage items. The heritage report considers there is no impact on the nearby heritage items, mainly ong>beong>cause they are separated from the heritage items by a reasonable distance. The assumption here is that the curtilage ong>ofong> the heritage items is limited and does not extend ong>toong> include the subject site. The report maintains that in the case ong>ofong> No 1359 Pacific Highway, almost directly opposite, separation by the Pacific Highway is sufficient and in the case on No 1428 Pacific Highway, separation by Lamond Drive and one other house lot is sufficient. It maintains that 1428 Pacific Highway is ong>toong>o far removed ong>toong> ong>beong> affected. While I accept that there is some physical and visual separation, I conclude that the development would have impact as the scale ong>ofong> the development is much wider and higher than the existing context, which is one and two song>toong>rey residential buildings in garden settings and it would ong>beong> a visually dominant element in the immediate area. However, I acknowledge that the proposed development would not diminish the view ong>ofong> the heritage items from the public areas, particularly the Pacific Highway. Impact on Urban Conservation Area. The subject site is located relatively close ong>toong> the National Trust UCA No 25 – Heydon Avenue Warrawee. The precinct includes most ong>ofong> the land ong>beong>tween the Pacific Highway and the railway line from Redleaf Avenue ong>toong> Finlay Road. Council has adopted a policy ong>ofong> reviewing the UCAs classified by the National Trust. UCA No 25 was reviewed in Ocong>toong>ong>beong>r 2004. The draft report extends the precinct along the Pacific Highway ong>toong> include No 1444, which is part ong>ofong> the subject site. Although Council has not exhibited the draft review for this area, it is apparent that the subject site has some contribuong>toong>ry values ong>toong> the UCA and the heritage impact assessment has not acknowledged this, or included reference ong>toong> it in its assessment. The review ong>ofong> this precinct, concludes it has State heritage significance. The following is the Statement ong>ofong> Significance, which supplements the statement in DCP 55: “The Heydon Avenue Warrawee UCA is one ong>ofong> the hisong>toong>rically and aesthetically distinctive residential areas within Ku-ring-gai which exhibit exceptional heritage significance and values in the integrity and qualities ong>ofong> their development pattern and streetscapes, buildings and gardens. The subdivision pattern ong>ofong> the area and its hisong>toong>rical evolution remain legible, retaining vestiges ong>ofong> the early estates in the boundaries and streets formed when subdivision were pursued - allowing many ong>ofong> the existing homes, which are the first buildings upon their sites, ong>toong> ong>beong> built. Many ong>ofong> these houses are the work ong>ofong> notable contemporary architects and retain their sophisticated garden settings, some ong>ofong> which are in turn the work ong>ofong> prominent landscape architects and gardeners. They are still ong>beong>ing studies and their significance ong>beong>tter undersong>toong>od. The areas predominantly residential character, established and maintained by its early residents and interrupted only by the well-known local people and private schools, in N:\050426-OMC-PR-03122-1 1A LAMOND DRIVE 1444.doc/cswanepoel/22

Ordinary Meeting <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Council - <strong>26</strong> April <strong>2005</strong> 20 / 21<br />

1 & 1A Lam<strong>on</strong>d Drive, 1444 &<br />

1444A Pacific Highway,<br />

Turramurra<br />

Item 20<br />

DA1099/04<br />

13 April <strong>2005</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>p <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the fr<strong>on</strong>tage kerb <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> prevent inund<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the basement level by flows over<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>pping in the<br />

gutter system.<br />

Geotechnical / Structural Comments<br />

In support <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the applic<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>, the applicant has submitted a “Preliminary Geotechnical<br />

Investig<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> report for Proposed Residential Development, Lam<strong>on</strong>d Drive, Turramurra” (job<br />

10543/1, d<strong>at</strong>ed 11 Oc<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>r 2004) prepared by Geotechnique.<br />

The sub-surface geotechnical investig<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>s (2 boreholes) and subsequent report are c<strong>on</strong>sidered<br />

appropri<strong>at</strong>e for DA assessment purposes <strong>on</strong> this proposal. The report c<strong>on</strong>tains inform<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> and<br />

recommend<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> excav<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> and c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> techniques based <strong>on</strong> the founding m<strong>at</strong>erial.<br />

Attenti<strong>on</strong> is paid <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> protecti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the adjace nt property and infrastructure, although a<br />

recommend<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> is made <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> carry out further borehole testing after demoliti<strong>on</strong>.<br />

In geotechnical m<strong>at</strong>ters, Council development assessment engineers are guided by the findings and<br />

recommend<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the expert geotechnical report submitted with the Development Applic<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Based <strong>on</strong> the geotechnical report submitted for this site, I am in a positi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>ally approve<br />

the geotechnical aspects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this DA. These c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s will require m<strong>on</strong>i<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>ring, c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> and<br />

further geotechnical design input as specified in the preliminary expert report.<br />

Recommend<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong><br />

Based <strong>on</strong> the formal assessment, Councils Development Engineer has determined th<strong>at</strong> the proposal<br />

is s<strong>at</strong>isfac<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>ry for development approval, subject <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> C<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

Heritage Advisor<br />

Council’s Heritage Advisor, Mr Paul Dignam, commented as follows:<br />

Heritage report<br />

A heritage impact st<strong>at</strong>ement was provided as part <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this applic<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>, prepared by Rappoport<br />

Heritage C<strong>on</strong>sultants. The report has investig<strong>at</strong>ed the site, but has made a few basic<br />

errors/omissi<strong>on</strong>s. Under heritage items within the vicinity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the subject site, the report fails <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

identify 1379 The Pacific Highway, which is <strong>on</strong> the opposite side <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the highway <strong>on</strong> the corner <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Lowther Park Avenue. The report identifies No 1428 Pacific Highway, which is further <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the north<br />

but <strong>on</strong> the same side <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the subject site. In rel<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> No 1359 Pacific Highway, it incorrectly<br />

refers <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> it as the “Cherrywood Nursing Home”. The building was c<strong>on</strong>verted <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> str<strong>at</strong>a apartments<br />

about 10 years ago and a new wing added. The report also fails <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> menti<strong>on</strong> Urban C<strong>on</strong>serv<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong><br />

Area No 25.<br />

The heritage report largely repe<strong>at</strong>s inform<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> prepared by Council <strong>on</strong> the significance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Kuring-gai<br />

and has adopted the standard questi<strong>on</strong>s developed by the NSW Heritage Council for<br />

N:\0504<strong>26</strong>-OMC-PR-03122-1 1A LAMOND DRIVE 1444.doc/cswanepoel/21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!