ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 26 april 2005 at ...
ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 26 april 2005 at ... ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 26 april 2005 at ...
Ordinary Meeting
Ordinary Meeting
- Page 425 and 426: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 427 and 428: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 429 and 430: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 431 and 432: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 433 and 434: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 435 and 436: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 437 and 438: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 439 and 440: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 441 and 442: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 443 and 444: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 445 and 446: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 447 and 448: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 449 and 450: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 451 and 452: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 453 and 454: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 455 and 456: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 457 and 458: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 459 and 460: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 461 and 462: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 463 and 464: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 465 and 466: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 467 and 468: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 469 and 470: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 471 and 472: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 473 and 474: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 475: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 479 and 480: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 481 and 482: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 483 and 484: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 485 and 486: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 487 and 488: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 489 and 490: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 491 and 492: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 493 and 494: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 495 and 496: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 497 and 498: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 499 and 500: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 501 and 502: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 503 and 504: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 505 and 506: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 507 and 508: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 509 and 510: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 511 and 512: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 513 and 514: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 515 and 516: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 517 and 518: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 519 and 520: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 521 and 522: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 523 and 524: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 525 and 526: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
Ordinary Meeting <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Council - <strong>26</strong> April <strong>2005</strong> 20 / 21<br />
1 & 1A Lam<strong>on</strong>d Drive, 1444 &<br />
1444A Pacific Highway,<br />
Turramurra<br />
Item 20<br />
DA1099/04<br />
13 April <strong>2005</strong><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>p <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the fr<strong>on</strong>tage kerb <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> prevent inund<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the basement level by flows over<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>pping in the<br />
gutter system.<br />
Geotechnical / Structural Comments<br />
In support <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the applic<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>, the applicant has submitted a “Preliminary Geotechnical<br />
Investig<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> report for Proposed Residential Development, Lam<strong>on</strong>d Drive, Turramurra” (job<br />
10543/1, d<strong>at</strong>ed 11 Oc<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>r 2004) prepared by Geotechnique.<br />
The sub-surface geotechnical investig<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>s (2 boreholes) and subsequent report are c<strong>on</strong>sidered<br />
appropri<strong>at</strong>e for DA assessment purposes <strong>on</strong> this proposal. The report c<strong>on</strong>tains inform<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> and<br />
recommend<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> excav<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> and c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> techniques based <strong>on</strong> the founding m<strong>at</strong>erial.<br />
Attenti<strong>on</strong> is paid <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> protecti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the adjace nt property and infrastructure, although a<br />
recommend<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> is made <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> carry out further borehole testing after demoliti<strong>on</strong>.<br />
In geotechnical m<strong>at</strong>ters, Council development assessment engineers are guided by the findings and<br />
recommend<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the expert geotechnical report submitted with the Development Applic<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Based <strong>on</strong> the geotechnical report submitted for this site, I am in a positi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>ally approve<br />
the geotechnical aspects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this DA. These c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s will require m<strong>on</strong>i<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>ring, c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> and<br />
further geotechnical design input as specified in the preliminary expert report.<br />
Recommend<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong><br />
Based <strong>on</strong> the formal assessment, Councils Development Engineer has determined th<strong>at</strong> the proposal<br />
is s<strong>at</strong>isfac<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>ry for development approval, subject <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> C<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
Heritage Advisor<br />
Council’s Heritage Advisor, Mr Paul Dignam, commented as follows:<br />
Heritage report<br />
A heritage impact st<strong>at</strong>ement was provided as part <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this applic<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>, prepared by Rappoport<br />
Heritage C<strong>on</strong>sultants. The report has investig<strong>at</strong>ed the site, but has made a few basic<br />
errors/omissi<strong>on</strong>s. Under heritage items within the vicinity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the subject site, the report fails <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
identify 1379 The Pacific Highway, which is <strong>on</strong> the opposite side <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the highway <strong>on</strong> the corner <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Lowther Park Avenue. The report identifies No 1428 Pacific Highway, which is further <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the north<br />
but <strong>on</strong> the same side <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the subject site. In rel<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> No 1359 Pacific Highway, it incorrectly<br />
refers <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> it as the “Cherrywood Nursing Home”. The building was c<strong>on</strong>verted <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> str<strong>at</strong>a apartments<br />
about 10 years ago and a new wing added. The report also fails <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> menti<strong>on</strong> Urban C<strong>on</strong>serv<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong><br />
Area No 25.<br />
The heritage report largely repe<strong>at</strong>s inform<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> prepared by Council <strong>on</strong> the significance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Kuring-gai<br />
and has adopted the standard questi<strong>on</strong>s developed by the NSW Heritage Council for<br />
N:\0504<strong>26</strong>-OMC-PR-03122-1 1A LAMOND DRIVE 1444.doc/cswanepoel/21