ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 26 april 2005 at ...
ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 26 april 2005 at ...
ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 26 april 2005 at ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Ordinary Meeting <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Council - <strong>26</strong> April <strong>2005</strong> 20 / 18<br />
1 & 1A Lam<strong>on</strong>d Drive, 1444 &<br />
1444A Pacific Highway,<br />
Turramurra<br />
Item 20<br />
DA1099/04<br />
13 April <strong>2005</strong><br />
(3) All car parking provided must not <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> open air car parking unless it is for visi<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>rs, in which case<br />
it must <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>structed with w<strong>at</strong>er-permeable paving unless the paving is directly above part <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />
basement.<br />
Based <strong>on</strong> the requirements <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the LEP, the proposal therefore requires a minimum <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 51 resident<br />
spaces and 13 visi<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>r spaces. The proposal provides 89 resident spaces and 13 visi<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>r spaces and<br />
therefore exceeds the requirements the LEP.<br />
The traffic gener<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this development has <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>en estim<strong>at</strong>ed using the RTA “Guide <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> Traffic<br />
Gener<strong>at</strong>ing Developments” as follows:<br />
Pre-Developed Post-developed<br />
No <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> dwellings 4 dwelling houses 51 units (4 x 1, 34 x 2, 13 x 3)<br />
Daily vehicle trips 36 (9 per dwelling) (Medium density)<br />
5 per dwelling up <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2 <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>drooms<br />
6.5 per dwelling 3 or more <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>drooms<br />
275 daily vehicle trips<br />
Peak hour vehicle trips 3.4 (0.85 per dwelling) 27.5<br />
In terms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the development <strong>on</strong> the road network, this can <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> ascertained generally by<br />
the capacity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the affected intersecti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>at</strong>er for the increased traffic loading. C<strong>on</strong>sidering th<strong>at</strong><br />
Lam<strong>on</strong>d Drive is a cul-de-sac, placing the net additi<strong>on</strong>al traffic figures <strong>at</strong> the Pacific<br />
Highway/Lam<strong>on</strong>d Drive intersecti<strong>on</strong> is not c<strong>on</strong>sidered <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> cre<strong>at</strong>e a problem, however this is<br />
c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>al th<strong>at</strong> exit from Lam<strong>on</strong>d Drive <strong>on</strong><str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> Pacific Hwy is restricted <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the left turn <strong>on</strong>ly. The<br />
right turn movement from Lam<strong>on</strong>d Ave in<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Pacific Hwy is currently permitted, however is<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sidered dangerous due <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> poor sight distance and approach speed <strong>on</strong> the highway. The<br />
install<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> “No right turn” signage is supported in the applicants DA submissi<strong>on</strong> traffic report,<br />
secti<strong>on</strong> 4.5, where it is st<strong>at</strong>ed “we c<strong>on</strong>cur with this proposal (<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> install no right turn signage) and<br />
the safety <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>nefits <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this proposal far outweigh the neg<strong>at</strong>ive impacts <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> residents having <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> travel<br />
further <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> travel south al<strong>on</strong>g the Pacific Highway”.<br />
Accordingly, it will <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> a requirement th<strong>at</strong> the applicant seek <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> install “no-right turn” signage <strong>at</strong><br />
the intersecti<strong>on</strong>, which will restrict access <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> and from Lam<strong>on</strong>d Ave <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> a left in, left out movement<br />
<strong>on</strong>ly. The install<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this signage will <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> subject <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the final approval <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the RTA (who will<br />
require a Traffic Management Plan (TMP) <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> prepared). In the interests <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> safety during<br />
c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>, this signage shall <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> put in place prior <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the commencement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> any works <strong>on</strong> site.<br />
As the install<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the signage is dependant up<strong>on</strong> RTA approval, the necessary c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong><br />
requiring the applicant <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> install the signage will <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> placed as a deferred commencement c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>.<br />
C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> Management<br />
A detailed c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> management plan must <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> submitted for re view by Council Engineers prior<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the commencement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> any works <strong>on</strong> site. This has <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>en c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>ed.<br />
N:\0504<strong>26</strong>-OMC-PR-03122-1 1A LAMOND DRIVE 1444.doc/cswanepoel/18