ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 26 april 2005 at ...

Ordinary Meeting <strong>of</strong> Council - 26 April 2005 19 / 52
2 <strong>to</strong> 4A Finlay Road, Turramurra
Item 19
DA1270/04
6 April 2005
Parking
viii. The proposed level <strong>of</strong> visi<strong>to</strong>r parking fails <strong>to</strong> comply with the requirements <strong>of</strong> LEP194.
Eleven spaces are required, whereas ten have <strong>be</strong>en provided. No SEPP1 objection has <strong>be</strong>en
submitted. (Refer: LEP194, Section 25J(2)(b)‘one space is provided for every 4 dwellings or
part there<strong>of</strong>’).
Inadequate information/plan inconsistencies
ix.
The Concept S<strong>to</strong>rmwater Drainage & On-site Retention Details Plan submitted with the
application shows a 1.5m wide drainage easement through the adjoining property <strong>to</strong> discharge
in<strong>to</strong> the existing natural overland flow path. This area <strong>of</strong> the adjoining site has not <strong>be</strong>en
surveyed and the location <strong>of</strong> existing trees and vegetation has not accurately <strong>be</strong>en undertaken.
Further information is necessary <strong>to</strong> determine the potential adverse impacts on existing trees
<strong>of</strong> the drainage easement.
x. The submitted arborist’s report is unsatisfac<strong>to</strong>ry as it does not provide sufficient detail <strong>to</strong> fully
assess and locate the existing trees on site and the impacts <strong>of</strong> the associated works. A revised
arborist’s report is required (further details are provided within the Statement <strong>of</strong> Basic Facts).
xi.
xii.
Consent <strong>of</strong> downstream property owners (1456a and 1454 Pacific Highway ) <strong>to</strong> grant an
interallotment drainage easement has not <strong>be</strong>en provided, as required by Ku-ring-gai Water
Management Development Control Plan 47.
The Construction Management Plan has not indicated the Location <strong>of</strong> Works Zone, on site
parking for employees and tradesmen (if available), construction vehicle routes <strong>to</strong> and from
the west and correct hours <strong>of</strong> work.
xiii. The s<strong>to</strong>rmwater management plan has not provided the level <strong>of</strong> detail required within
Appendix 13 <strong>of</strong> Council’s DCP 47 Water Management, including: separate s<strong>to</strong>rage <strong>of</strong>
rainwater and s<strong>to</strong>rmwater, water quality measures, concept design for the proposed
interallotment drainage through 1456a and 1454 Pacific Highway, pipes laid outside deep soil
zone, water balance <strong>to</strong> demonstrate attenuation <strong>of</strong> discharge, or the provision <strong>of</strong> an on site
detention component.
xiv. The plans are insufficient <strong>to</strong> ascertain levels <strong>of</strong> the floors from natural ground level. Levels
from natural ground level are not provided in sections at critical points over the building.
Particulars:
a. The point <strong>of</strong> the northern-most lift the levels from the survey as compared <strong>to</strong> the
elevations would suggest a level <strong>of</strong> greater than 1.2 metres for basement 1. This results
in a consequent seventh floor (depicted as ‘ro<strong>of</strong> level’), for which a SEPP1 objection
would need <strong>to</strong> <strong>be</strong> provided. An elevation through this critical point needs <strong>to</strong> <strong>be</strong>
provided <strong>to</strong> clarify this non-compliance.
N:\050426-OMC-PR-03090-2 TO 4A FINLAY ROAD TURRA.doc/klithgow/52