ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 26 april 2005 at ...

ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 26 april 2005 at ... ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 26 april 2005 at ...

kmc.nsw.gov.au
from kmc.nsw.gov.au More from this publisher
23.03.2014 Views

(ii) What financial impact will the proposed increase, including any concurrent changes ong>toong> rating and charging policies have on ratepayers and particularly pensioners? Based on a 5% increase, approximately $1,760,000 ($1,887,310 less pensioner rebates ong>ofong> $127,310) would ong>beong> generated in 2005/2006 with subsequent increases as projected in Council’s 10 year financial model. This figure is based on 36,292 rate assessments less 3,290 pensioner rebates. This additional income represents 1.9 per cent ong>ofong> the expected revenue for Council in the 2005/06 budget. Given that there are currently 36,292 rate assessments, this would equate ong>toong> an average cost per household ong>ofong> $52.00. It should ong>beong> noted that this figure is an indicative average only and will vary ong>beong>tween rate assessments in line with differences in rateable land values. Council will grant eligible pensioners a full rebate on this levy. Council currently has approximately 3,290 assessments that are subject ong>toong> a pensioner rebate, therefore the anticipated cost ong>toong> Council in granting this rebate would ong>beong> approximately $127,310 per annum. (iii) Additional comments including range ong>ofong> increases 16. PUBLICITY A. (1) What additional publicity has ong>beong>en given ong>toong> the Council’s proposal ong>toong> seek this variation apart from the draft management plan (DMP)? (2) Provide a copy ong>ofong> the relevant inclusion in the DMP including both rating and charging structures (ie. with and without special variation application); and (3) State exhibition dates ong>ofong> DMP. A. (1) In addition ong>toong> the Draft Management Plan, Ku-ring-gai Council has ensured contact across the community through media and extensive community consultation. Council has prepared summary and detailed documents available on the Internet, and distributed through public facilities, as well as a media release for the press. Formal publicity on the environmental levy commenced on February 18th 2005 through the announcement in the Mayoral Column in The North Shore Times, with details posted concurrently on Council’s website the same day. Attachment 3 provides a detailed summary ong>ofong> the consultation ong>toong> date. Newspapers Council has made concerted efforts ong>toong> have material published in local and metropolitan newspapers, including using its own column in the North Shore Times. Specific reports through newspapers ong>toong> date (4 th April, 2005) include (see Attachments 4 for articles): • Ku-ring-gai Council media release ‘Community views sought on environmental levy’ – sent out March 11, 2005 • North Shore Times, Mayoral Column, 16th Feb 2005; • Daily Telegraph – “Councils’ rates on the up and up” article, page 9, Monday 14th March 484671 Page 37

2005 • North Shore Times Ediong>toong>rial ‘Levy will ong>beong> a winner if used correctly,’ Friday March 18th, 2005 • North Shore Times - "Council ponders green fee" Article, page 3 Friday March 18th, 2005 Council Newsletters Through its newsletters Council has provided summarised information about the levy and access points for more detailed information. These include the article, “Environmental levy for Ku-ring-gai?’ in the Bushcare News, the Ku-ring-gai Bushcare Community Volunteer Newsletter, Issue 46, Summer 2004/05 sent out in early February 2005. The Open Space quarterly newsletter “Out in the Open” will provide updated levy information including results ong>ofong> resident feedback in the next edition due out in June, 2005, as will Council‘s newsletter that is forwarded ong>toong> every property. Ku-ring-gai Council Website Detailed information has ong>beong>en available on Ku-ring-gai Council's website (http://www.kmc.nsw.gov.au/) since 18th February 2005. Specifically, the site explains reasons for the proposal, and its legislative basis (Local Government Act 1993, S508(2)). It also descriong>beong>s the amount and form ong>ofong> the proposed levy, Council’s financial position (2000- 2012), specific programme areas and projects ong>toong> ong>beong> funded, accountability, transparency and review mechanisms, communication methods, and consultation and participation processes. These are linked electronically ong>toong> all relevant Council reports and sites. Mail Out Survey During march 2005, three thousand mail out surveys were sent ong>toong> residents with summarised information on the proposal accompanying the survey. A return rate ong>ofong> over 30% was achieved with this survey. B. (1) What was the public reaction ong>toong> the proposal? Include summary ong>ofong> responses received ong>beong>fore, during and after the exhibition ong>ofong> the Management Plan with respect ong>toong> proposed rates and charges. (2) Give an indication ong>ofong> the numong>beong>r ong>ofong> responses (including numong>beong>r for and numong>beong>r against proposal) and ong>councilong>’s response, if any. Council Advisory Committees The Open Space Advisory Committees comprising the Parks, Sport & Recreation Reference Group and Bushland, Catchments and Natural Areas Reference Group have ong>beong>en directly involved in levy discussions, providing input inong>toong> the development ong>ofong> the levy proposal, and providing feedback on issues. These groups have ong>beong>en overwhelmingly favourable in support for the levy as proposed, and have reinforced the strong need for these programmes in maintaining, preserving and improving our environment. Community Responses Throughout the consultation process ong>beong>fore, during and after the exhibition ong>ofong> the Management Plan, the public reaction ong>toong> the proposal for the rate variation has ong>beong>en continually moniong>toong>red and analysed, with the feedback ong>beong>ing incorporated inong>toong> the final proposal and Management Plan. Pre Management Plan 484671 Page 38

<strong>2005</strong><br />

• North Shore Times Edi<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>rial ‘Levy will <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> a winner if used correctly,’ Friday March 18th,<br />

<strong>2005</strong><br />

• North Shore Times - "Council p<strong>on</strong>ders green fee" Article, page 3 Friday March 18th,<br />

<strong>2005</strong><br />

Council Newsletters<br />

Through its newsletters Council has provided summarised inform<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> about the levy and<br />

access points for more detailed inform<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>. These include the article, “Envir<strong>on</strong>mental levy<br />

for Ku-ring-gai?’ in the Bushcare News, the Ku-ring-gai Bushcare Community Volunteer<br />

Newsletter, Issue 46, Summer 2004/05 sent out in early February <strong>2005</strong>. The Open Space<br />

quarterly newsletter “Out in the Open” will provide upd<strong>at</strong>ed levy inform<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> including<br />

results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> resident feedback in the next editi<strong>on</strong> due out in June, <strong>2005</strong>, as will Council‘s<br />

newsletter th<strong>at</strong> is forwarded <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> every property.<br />

Ku-ring-gai Council Website<br />

Detailed inform<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> has <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>en available <strong>on</strong> Ku-ring-gai Council's website<br />

(http://www.kmc.nsw.gov.au/) since 18th February <strong>2005</strong>. Specifically, the site explains<br />

reas<strong>on</strong>s for the proposal, and its legisl<strong>at</strong>ive basis (Local Government Act 1993, S508(2)). It<br />

also descri<str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>s the amount and form <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the proposed levy, Council’s financial positi<strong>on</strong> (2000-<br />

2012), specific programme areas and projects <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> funded, accountability, transparency and<br />

review mechanisms, communic<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> methods, and c<strong>on</strong>sult<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> and particip<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> processes.<br />

These are linked electr<strong>on</strong>ically <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> all relevant Council reports and sites.<br />

Mail Out Survey<br />

During march <strong>2005</strong>, three thousand mail out surveys were sent <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> residents with summarised<br />

inform<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> the proposal accompanying the survey. A return r<strong>at</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> over 30% was<br />

achieved with this survey.<br />

B. (1) Wh<strong>at</strong> was the public reacti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the proposal? Include summary <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> resp<strong>on</strong>ses<br />

received <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>fore, during and after the exhibiti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Management Plan with respect <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

proposed r<strong>at</strong>es and charges.<br />

(2) Give an indic<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the num<str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>r <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> resp<strong>on</strong>ses (including num<str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>r for and num<str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>r<br />

against proposal) and <str<strong>on</strong>g>council</str<strong>on</strong>g>’s resp<strong>on</strong>se, if any.<br />

Council Advisory Committees<br />

The Open Space Advisory Committees comprising the Parks, Sport & Recre<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> Reference<br />

Group and Bushland, C<strong>at</strong>chments and N<strong>at</strong>ural Areas Reference Group have <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>en directly<br />

involved in levy discussi<strong>on</strong>s, providing input in<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the development <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the levy proposal, and<br />

providing feedback <strong>on</strong> issues. These groups have <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>en overwhelmingly favourable in support<br />

for the levy as proposed, and have reinforced the str<strong>on</strong>g need for these programmes in<br />

maintaining, preserving and improving our envir<strong>on</strong>ment.<br />

Community Resp<strong>on</strong>ses<br />

Throughout the c<strong>on</strong>sult<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> process <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>fore, during and after the exhibiti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

Management Plan, the public reacti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the proposal for the r<strong>at</strong>e vari<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> has <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>en<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tinually m<strong>on</strong>i<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>red and analysed, with the feedback <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>ing incorpor<strong>at</strong>ed in<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the final<br />

proposal and Management Plan.<br />

Pre Management Plan<br />

484671 Page 38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!