ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 26 april 2005 at ...

ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 26 april 2005 at ... ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 26 april 2005 at ...

kmc.nsw.gov.au
from kmc.nsw.gov.au More from this publisher
23.03.2014 Views

Ordinary Meeting ong>ofong> Council - 26 April 2005 1 / 12 1, 3, and 5 Lynbara Avenue and 12 Porters Lane, St Ives Item 1 1219/04 1 April 2005 The deep soil calculations as shown on the Deep Soil Planting Plan submitted with the application has included the garden ong>beong>d ong>beong>tween the proposed disabled ramp and Stanley St. This garden ong>beong>d is less than 2.0 metres wide and as such under the terms and definitions within LEP194 is ong>toong> ong>beong> excluded from the calculated deep soil landscaping area. Having said this the applicant has indicated that they have a deep soil landscaping area ong>ofong> 52%. If this is the case, this additional area ong>beong>ing added ong>toong> the calculations should not result in non-compliance with the required 50% deep soil landscaping requirement. Setbacks The proposed setback for the proposed basement car park adjacent ong>toong> the Stanley St and Lynbara Ave corner is proposed ong>toong> ong>beong> approximately 7 – 8.0m which restricts the available deep soil landscaping within the front setback. It is preferred that the setback at this corner ong>beong> maximised ong>toong> ensure that large trees can ong>beong> accommodated. The setback as proposed will accommodate smaller trees or medium sized trees adjacent ong>toong> the site frontage. It must ong>beong> noted however that the setbacks as proposed increase the rear setback for tree planting, which will help alleviate issues ong>ofong> screening and overlooking ong>toong> the adjoining single song>toong>rey villas from the proposed five song>toong>rey development. As the proposed development is set ong>beong>hind gardens and the landscape character ong>ofong> the existing neighbourhood can ong>beong> maintained the reduced front setback for the basement can ong>beong> supported. Substation Should Energy Australia require a substation ong>toong> ong>beong> installed for the development, it is required that the substation ong>beong> located so that it does not dominate the landscape and is located outside ong>ofong> the canopy drip line ong>ofong> any tree ong>toong> ong>beong> retained. It is preferred that it ong>beong> located within the landscape so that it can ong>beong> screened from view (Condition No.75). Subject ong>toong> conditions, Landscape Services can support the application.” Engineering Council’s Engineering Assessment Officer has commented on the proposal as follows: “Summary In summary the application can ong>beong> supported by Development Engineers, subject ong>toong> the imposition ong>ofong> the engineering conditions ong>ofong> consent. A pre-DA ong>meetingong> was ong>heldong> for this site in which the applicant was presented with assessment criteria related ong>toong> the engineering aspects. Generally the applicant has had regard ong>toong> the engineering issues raised at this pre-DA ong>meetingong>, and has submitted the requested information. Subdivision The application form indicates that subdivision is not proposed under this DA, hence no further subdivision conditions will ong>beong> applied in this referral response. So that the building is not N:\050426-OMC-PR-03117-1 3 AND 5 LYNBARA AVENUE.doc/ssegall/12

Ordinary Meeting ong>ofong> Council - 26 April 2005 1 / 13 1, 3, and 5 Lynbara Avenue and 12 Porters Lane, St Ives Item 1 1219/04 1 April 2005 constructed across lot boundaries, the applicant will ong>beong> required ong>toong> consolidate all the lots prior ong>toong> issue ong>ofong> the Construction Certificate (Condition No. 86). Traffic generation The applicant has submitted a Traffic Report with the Development Application. The report is an acceptable standard on which ong>toong> base an assessment ong>ofong> the traffic related impacts ong>ofong> the Development. Based on the requirement ong>ofong> LEP 194, the proposal requires a minimum ong>ofong> 83 spaces which includes 12 visiong>toong>r spaces. The proposal provides 83 spaces and complies with the LEP. In terms ong>ofong> the impact ong>ofong> the development on the road network, this can ong>beong> ascertained generally by the capacity ong>ofong> the affected intersections ong>toong> cater for the increased traffic loading. This is ong>beong>st determined by modeling the affected intersections at existing and post-developed use. The Traffic Generation ong>ofong> this Development has ong>beong>en estimated using the RTA “Guide ong>toong> Traffic Generating Developments” as follows: Pre-Developed Post-developed No ong>ofong> dwellings 4 dwelling houses 4 x 1 ong>beong>droom 24 x 2 ong>beong>droom 21 x 3 ong>beong>droom Daily vehicle trips 36 (9 per dwelling) 217 Based (over conservatively) on medium density: 4-5 per dwelling (2 or less ong>beong>drooms) 5 ong>toong> 6.5 per dwelling ((3 or more ong>beong>drooms) Peak hour vehicle trips 3.4 (0.85 per dwelling) 24.5 (0.5 per unit average) The Stanley St/Lynbarra Ave street intersection has ong>beong>en assessed with the INTANAL program by the Applicants consulting Traffic Engineer (refer section 3.3 ong>ofong> DA submission Traffic Report). The results show that the intersection operates currently at a ‘good’ level ong>ofong> service as defined by INTANAL. The assignment ong>ofong> an additional (net) 21 vehicles peak hour trips (see table above) inong>toong> this nearest intersection is not expected ong>toong> lower the operating level ong>ofong> service ong>beong>low ‘good’ level ong>ofong> service. An additional 21 trips over one peak hour is an average ong>ofong> one vehicle movement every 3 minutes over the hour. It is noted that Mona Vale Rd is accessible via Lynbarra Ave and it is reasonable ong>toong> assume that the spread ong>ofong> peak vehicles may ong>beong> heading ong>toong> Mona Vale Rd via both Lynbarra Ave and Stanley Street, or ong>toong>wards ong>toong> the city for example via Horace Street and Yarrabung Road ong>toong> the east. Traffic counts taken by the Applicants consulting engineer during am and pm peak times indicate average acceptable delays in Stanley Street for vehicles ong>toong> enter from the subject site. N:\050426-OMC-PR-03117-1 3 AND 5 LYNBARA AVENUE.doc/ssegall/13

Ordinary Meeting <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Council - <strong>26</strong> April <strong>2005</strong> 1 / 12<br />

1, 3, and 5 Lynbara Avenue and<br />

12 Porters Lane, St Ives<br />

Item 1 1219/04<br />

1 April <strong>2005</strong><br />

The deep soil calcul<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>s as shown <strong>on</strong> the Deep Soil Planting Plan submitted with the applic<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong><br />

has included the garden <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>d <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>tween the proposed disabled ramp and Stanley St. This garden <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>d<br />

is less than 2.0 metres wide and as such under the terms and definiti<strong>on</strong>s within LEP194 is <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

excluded from the calcul<strong>at</strong>ed deep soil landscaping area. Having said this the applicant has<br />

indic<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> they have a deep soil landscaping area <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 52%. If this is the case, this additi<strong>on</strong>al area<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>ing added <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the calcul<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>s should not result in n<strong>on</strong>-compliance with the required 50% deep<br />

soil landscaping requirement.<br />

Setbacks<br />

The proposed setback for the proposed basement car park adjacent <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Stanley St and Lynbara<br />

Ave corner is proposed <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 7 – 8.0m which restricts the available deep soil<br />

landscaping within the fr<strong>on</strong>t setback. It is preferred th<strong>at</strong> the setback <strong>at</strong> this corner <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> maximised <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

ensure th<strong>at</strong> large trees can <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> accommod<strong>at</strong>ed. The setback as proposed will accommod<strong>at</strong>e smaller<br />

trees or medium sized trees adjacent <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the site fr<strong>on</strong>tage. It must <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> noted however th<strong>at</strong> the setbacks<br />

as proposed increase the rear setback for tree planting, which will help allevi<strong>at</strong>e issues <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> screening<br />

and overlooking <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the adjoining single s<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>rey villas from the proposed five s<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>rey development. As<br />

the proposed development is set <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>hind gardens and the landscape character <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the existing<br />

neighbourhood can <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> maintained the reduced fr<strong>on</strong>t setback for the basement can <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> supported.<br />

Subst<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong><br />

Should Energy Australia require a subst<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> installed for the development, it is required th<strong>at</strong><br />

the subst<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> loc<strong>at</strong>ed so th<strong>at</strong> it does not domin<strong>at</strong>e the landscape and is loc<strong>at</strong>ed outside <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

canopy drip line <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> any tree <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> retained. It is preferred th<strong>at</strong> it <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> loc<strong>at</strong>ed within the landscape so<br />

th<strong>at</strong> it can <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> screened from view (C<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> No.75).<br />

Subject <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, Landscape Services can support the applic<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>.”<br />

Engineering<br />

Council’s Engineering Assessment Officer has commented <strong>on</strong> the proposal as follows:<br />

“Summary<br />

In summary the applic<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> can <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> supported by Development Engineers, subject <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the impositi<strong>on</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the engineering c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>sent.<br />

A pre-DA <str<strong>on</strong>g>meeting</str<strong>on</strong>g> was <str<strong>on</strong>g>held</str<strong>on</strong>g> for this site in which the applicant was presented with assessment<br />

criteria rel<strong>at</strong>ed <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the engineering aspects. Generally the applicant has had regard <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

engineering issues raised <strong>at</strong> this pre-DA <str<strong>on</strong>g>meeting</str<strong>on</strong>g>, and has submitted the requested inform<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Subdivisi<strong>on</strong><br />

The applic<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> form indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> subdivisi<strong>on</strong> is not proposed under this DA, hence no further<br />

subdivisi<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s will <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> applied in this referral resp<strong>on</strong>se. So th<strong>at</strong> the building is not<br />

N:\0504<strong>26</strong>-OMC-PR-03117-1 3 AND 5 LYNBARA AVENUE.doc/ssegall/12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!