ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 26 april 2005 at ...
ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 26 april 2005 at ... ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 26 april 2005 at ...
Ordinary Meeting
Ordinary Meeting
- Page 1 and 2: ORDINARY MEETING OF COUNCIL TO BE H
- Page 3 and 4: Owner: C A Building Pty Ltd To dete
- Page 5 and 6: To consider a request by the Applic
- Page 7 and 8: Section 69 of the
- Page 9 and 10: efforts made by the Government and
- Page 11 and 12: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 13 and 14: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 15 and 16: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 17 and 18: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 19 and 20: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 21 and 22: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 23: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 27 and 28: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 29 and 30: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 31 and 32: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 33 and 34: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 35 and 36: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 37 and 38: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 39 and 40: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 41 and 42: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 43 and 44: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 45 and 46: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 47 and 48: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 49 and 50: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 51 and 52: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 53 and 54: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 55 and 56: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 57 and 58: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 59 and 60: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 61 and 62: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 63 and 64: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 65 and 66: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 67 and 68: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 69 and 70: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 71 and 72: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
- Page 73 and 74: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
Ordinary Meeting <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Council - <strong>26</strong> April <strong>2005</strong> 1 / 12<br />
1, 3, and 5 Lynbara Avenue and<br />
12 Porters Lane, St Ives<br />
Item 1 1219/04<br />
1 April <strong>2005</strong><br />
The deep soil calcul<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>s as shown <strong>on</strong> the Deep Soil Planting Plan submitted with the applic<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong><br />
has included the garden <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>d <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>tween the proposed disabled ramp and Stanley St. This garden <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>d<br />
is less than 2.0 metres wide and as such under the terms and definiti<strong>on</strong>s within LEP194 is <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
excluded from the calcul<strong>at</strong>ed deep soil landscaping area. Having said this the applicant has<br />
indic<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> they have a deep soil landscaping area <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 52%. If this is the case, this additi<strong>on</strong>al area<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>ing added <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the calcul<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>s should not result in n<strong>on</strong>-compliance with the required 50% deep<br />
soil landscaping requirement.<br />
Setbacks<br />
The proposed setback for the proposed basement car park adjacent <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Stanley St and Lynbara<br />
Ave corner is proposed <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 7 – 8.0m which restricts the available deep soil<br />
landscaping within the fr<strong>on</strong>t setback. It is preferred th<strong>at</strong> the setback <strong>at</strong> this corner <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> maximised <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
ensure th<strong>at</strong> large trees can <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> accommod<strong>at</strong>ed. The setback as proposed will accommod<strong>at</strong>e smaller<br />
trees or medium sized trees adjacent <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the site fr<strong>on</strong>tage. It must <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> noted however th<strong>at</strong> the setbacks<br />
as proposed increase the rear setback for tree planting, which will help allevi<strong>at</strong>e issues <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> screening<br />
and overlooking <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the adjoining single s<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>rey villas from the proposed five s<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>rey development. As<br />
the proposed development is set <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g>hind gardens and the landscape character <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the existing<br />
neighbourhood can <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> maintained the reduced fr<strong>on</strong>t setback for the basement can <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> supported.<br />
Subst<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong><br />
Should Energy Australia require a subst<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> installed for the development, it is required th<strong>at</strong><br />
the subst<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> loc<strong>at</strong>ed so th<strong>at</strong> it does not domin<strong>at</strong>e the landscape and is loc<strong>at</strong>ed outside <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />
canopy drip line <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> any tree <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> retained. It is preferred th<strong>at</strong> it <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> loc<strong>at</strong>ed within the landscape so<br />
th<strong>at</strong> it can <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> screened from view (C<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> No.75).<br />
Subject <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, Landscape Services can support the applic<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>.”<br />
Engineering<br />
Council’s Engineering Assessment Officer has commented <strong>on</strong> the proposal as follows:<br />
“Summary<br />
In summary the applic<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> can <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> supported by Development Engineers, subject <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the impositi<strong>on</strong><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the engineering c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>sent.<br />
A pre-DA <str<strong>on</strong>g>meeting</str<strong>on</strong>g> was <str<strong>on</strong>g>held</str<strong>on</strong>g> for this site in which the applicant was presented with assessment<br />
criteria rel<strong>at</strong>ed <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the engineering aspects. Generally the applicant has had regard <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />
engineering issues raised <strong>at</strong> this pre-DA <str<strong>on</strong>g>meeting</str<strong>on</strong>g>, and has submitted the requested inform<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Subdivisi<strong>on</strong><br />
The applic<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> form indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> subdivisi<strong>on</strong> is not proposed under this DA, hence no further<br />
subdivisi<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s will <str<strong>on</strong>g>be</str<strong>on</strong>g> applied in this referral resp<strong>on</strong>se. So th<strong>at</strong> the building is not<br />
N:\0504<strong>26</strong>-OMC-PR-03117-1 3 AND 5 LYNBARA AVENUE.doc/ssegall/12