The Journal of the Siam Society Vol. XXIX, Part 1-2, 1936 - Khamkoo

PI'. I] 'I'AI PO'ITERY 21
pieces of pottery at a depth of 1110re than 2 metres. Which then is the
older, O'ieng S~n or that walled place called Kalong to the soutli, in the
vicinity of which I collected many specimens of pottery? I assume that
the latter was of an older origin, because its ramparts are of earth work,
and also because of its vicinity to other old places, such as Wieng Ho,
Dong Wieng, Muang Wang, an,d C~ Hom, to which no date has been
assigned in History. References are found in the P'ongsa.wadan
Yonolc, pp. 124 and 435, which name the territories comprised within
the old Kingdom of P'ayao. It is stated there that, in the first year
of the Little Era which synchronises with 638 A. D., these four
places were merely p' anna, a term of territorial division which may
be compared in modern parlance to a ta'f!tbOn. My theory about the
age of Kalong and other old walled places in this vicinity would
seem to find some support in the fact that specimens of pottery from
these places have been found in the stiipa of Nak'on Pathom, in
the stiipa of the Great Relic in Lopburi, and at P'ong Tu'k, which
places no one will deny are older than O'ieng S~n. Many Shans
(related to the Tai stock) of an older generation whom I have met
and discussed the problem with gave an unanimous opinion that the
design and writing on this pottery were Tai Lu' which they could
read although it was different to their own writing (Plate xx). The
home of these Lu' is north of C'ieng Sen centred around O'ieng
Rting.
6.-SITE OF O'ALIENG.
As to where the site of the ancient city of O'alieng really is,
Prince Damrong in his commentary on the "Travels in the P'ral;t
Ruang country," written by His late Majesty King Rama VI., came
to the conclusion that O'alieng was situated in the neighbourhood of
the monastery of the Great Relic in old Sawank'alok. I do not think
any one would care to argue against this, for Prince Damrong's
statement is supported by the evidence of stone inscriptions. On the.
Rama K'an).heng inscription (No. I in Oredes' Recueildes inscriptions
du Sia.m, Premiere partie) it is declared that "a stone inscription has
been erected with the stiipa of the Great Relic at O'alieng ". This
causes me to believe that although the two names of O'alieng and
Q(r)i Satc'analai are distinct one from the other, the latter being
situated a little further north near the Great Rapids (K~ng Luang),
still the two names have been applied indiscriminately to the same
place in l11ter day-s. Unless? therefore, these two cities were ~lose