Rebirth and the Western Buddhist - Khamkoo
Rebirth and the Western Buddhist - Khamkoo
Rebirth and the Western Buddhist - Khamkoo
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Buddhism, Science <strong>and</strong> Scientism 51<br />
There is much discussion of <strong>the</strong> difficulties with neo<br />
Darwinian <strong>the</strong>ory by biologists <strong>the</strong>mselves, of which any<br />
<strong>Buddhist</strong> who wishes to criticise Darwinism without<br />
making a fool of himself should take <strong>the</strong> trouble to<br />
become informed. A brief introduction is given in R<strong>and</strong>all's<br />
book, where fur<strong>the</strong>r references may be found.<br />
The foundation of biology is necessarily physics. But<br />
while biologists in general have yet to move into <strong>the</strong><br />
post-mechanist age, <strong>the</strong> discovery of Relativity <strong>and</strong><br />
Quantum Mechanics freed physicists from <strong>the</strong> crudely<br />
mechanical ways of thinking prevalent in <strong>the</strong> nineteenth<br />
century. As Merrell-Wolff 90 points out, "since 1896<br />
physics has laid <strong>the</strong> foundation for mysticism with a<br />
vengeance," <strong>and</strong> it provides no support for <strong>the</strong> materialistic<br />
interpretation of Darwinism. Convincing evidence<br />
of <strong>the</strong> similarity of <strong>the</strong> physicist's <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> mystic's worldviews<br />
is given by LeShan, 91 who presents many quotations<br />
from <strong>the</strong> writings of physicists <strong>and</strong> mystics <strong>and</strong><br />
invites <strong>the</strong> reader to judge which is which. Physics has<br />
ab<strong>and</strong>oned <strong>the</strong> concept of things existing absolutely,<br />
from <strong>the</strong>ir own side, <strong>and</strong> recognises that phenomena<br />
depend very much on <strong>the</strong> observer <strong>and</strong> what observations<br />
he makes. All <strong>the</strong> information a physicist has comes<br />
through his sensory consciousnesses, thus he cannot<br />
avoid being concerned with mind in <strong>the</strong> end. So weird<br />
are <strong>the</strong> ideas of <strong>the</strong> physics of elementary particles that it<br />
is not too surprising to find a <strong>the</strong>oretical physicist elaborating<br />
a <strong>the</strong>ory that electrons carry mind. 92 (However, this<br />
approach will obviously not be able to account for memories<br />
of past lives in a single chain, unmixed with o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
individuals, as observed, so like most of <strong>the</strong> ideas of<br />
<strong>the</strong>oretical physicists it will presumably be a dead end.)<br />
Now, "There is but one indefectibly certain truth, <strong>and</strong><br />
that is <strong>the</strong> truth that pyrrhonistic scepticism itself leaves<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ing-<strong>the</strong> truth that <strong>the</strong> present phenomenon of<br />
consciousness exists." 93 How <strong>the</strong>n is it possible that <strong>the</strong><br />
concept of mind as something more than <strong>the</strong> physical