20.03.2014 Views

Rebirth and the Western Buddhist - Khamkoo

Rebirth and the Western Buddhist - Khamkoo

Rebirth and the Western Buddhist - Khamkoo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Buddhism, Science <strong>and</strong> Scientism 51<br />

There is much discussion of <strong>the</strong> difficulties with neo­<br />

Darwinian <strong>the</strong>ory by biologists <strong>the</strong>mselves, of which any<br />

<strong>Buddhist</strong> who wishes to criticise Darwinism without<br />

making a fool of himself should take <strong>the</strong> trouble to<br />

become informed. A brief introduction is given in R<strong>and</strong>all's<br />

book, where fur<strong>the</strong>r references may be found.<br />

The foundation of biology is necessarily physics. But<br />

while biologists in general have yet to move into <strong>the</strong><br />

post-mechanist age, <strong>the</strong> discovery of Relativity <strong>and</strong><br />

Quantum Mechanics freed physicists from <strong>the</strong> crudely<br />

mechanical ways of thinking prevalent in <strong>the</strong> nineteenth<br />

century. As Merrell-Wolff 90 points out, "since 1896<br />

physics has laid <strong>the</strong> foundation for mysticism with a<br />

vengeance," <strong>and</strong> it provides no support for <strong>the</strong> materialistic<br />

interpretation of Darwinism. Convincing evidence<br />

of <strong>the</strong> similarity of <strong>the</strong> physicist's <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> mystic's worldviews<br />

is given by LeShan, 91 who presents many quotations<br />

from <strong>the</strong> writings of physicists <strong>and</strong> mystics <strong>and</strong><br />

invites <strong>the</strong> reader to judge which is which. Physics has<br />

ab<strong>and</strong>oned <strong>the</strong> concept of things existing absolutely,<br />

from <strong>the</strong>ir own side, <strong>and</strong> recognises that phenomena<br />

depend very much on <strong>the</strong> observer <strong>and</strong> what observations<br />

he makes. All <strong>the</strong> information a physicist has comes<br />

through his sensory consciousnesses, thus he cannot<br />

avoid being concerned with mind in <strong>the</strong> end. So weird<br />

are <strong>the</strong> ideas of <strong>the</strong> physics of elementary particles that it<br />

is not too surprising to find a <strong>the</strong>oretical physicist elaborating<br />

a <strong>the</strong>ory that electrons carry mind. 92 (However, this<br />

approach will obviously not be able to account for memories<br />

of past lives in a single chain, unmixed with o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

individuals, as observed, so like most of <strong>the</strong> ideas of<br />

<strong>the</strong>oretical physicists it will presumably be a dead end.)<br />

Now, "There is but one indefectibly certain truth, <strong>and</strong><br />

that is <strong>the</strong> truth that pyrrhonistic scepticism itself leaves<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ing-<strong>the</strong> truth that <strong>the</strong> present phenomenon of<br />

consciousness exists." 93 How <strong>the</strong>n is it possible that <strong>the</strong><br />

concept of mind as something more than <strong>the</strong> physical

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!