19.03.2014 Views

Download Personal Injury and Fatal Accident Brief - Kennedys

Download Personal Injury and Fatal Accident Brief - Kennedys

Download Personal Injury and Fatal Accident Brief - Kennedys

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Personal</strong> <strong>Injury</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Fatal</strong> <strong>Accident</strong> <strong>Brief</strong><br />

August 2011<br />

In Chan Yin Na v Union Medical Centre Ltd (HCPI 804 of 2003), the Plaintiff sought costs of HK$11m<br />

against the Defendants. At the original taxation hearing, leading <strong>and</strong> junior counsel’s brief fees<br />

<strong>and</strong> other charges were substantially taxed down. For example, leading counsel’s brief fee was<br />

reduced from HK$500,000 to HK$406,000 <strong>and</strong> junior counsel’s brief was slashed from HK$350,000<br />

to HK$225,000. There were several other items which the taxing master did not allow or reduced<br />

substantially.<br />

The Plaintiff sought a review of taxing master’s decision, which was refused. The Plaintiff then<br />

asked the court to review the decision of the taxing master.<br />

The matter was heard before the PI Judge, Hon Bharwaney J, who agreed with the assessment<br />

made by the taxing master, save for a few minor items. In his Judgment, Hon Bharwaney J not only<br />

agreed with the taxing master’s decisions, he went further saying, the taxing master was<br />

“exceedingly generous”. He did not agree with the Plaintiff’s submission that higher fees should<br />

have been allowed because the case involved complex issues of medical negligence. In his view,<br />

“this was not a medical negligence case involving extremely complicated science requiring many<br />

hours of work by counsel to underst<strong>and</strong> that science <strong>and</strong> to prepare for the cross-examination of<br />

renowned experts on the subject of that complicated science”. He even went so far as to say that<br />

if he was the taxing master, he might not have been as convinced as the learned master that this<br />

was such a complex <strong>and</strong> weighty case as to warrant such high fees. However, the defendants did<br />

not seek to review any items of costs allowed by the taxing master, so he was not in a position to<br />

reduce any of the fees allowed by the taxing master.<br />

The Judgment also looked at the issue of whether a review of taxation by a judge was a hearing de<br />

novo (meaning hearing it afresh) or whether the judge would only interfere with the decision of<br />

the taxing master if he has made an error of law, or taken into account irrelevant matters, or<br />

failed to take into account relevant matters. While Hon Bharwaney J recognised that a judge may<br />

have the power to re-open the taxation hearing <strong>and</strong> hear everything afresh, he declined to do so<br />

under the circumstances of this case.<br />

1


We hope the Judge’s observations in this case sound a warning to counsel to keep their charges to<br />

a reasonable level. In future, it may well be worthwhile proceeding to taxation of counsel’s fees if<br />

they refuse to accept a reasonable offer.<br />

We are always looking for feedback, <strong>and</strong> please feel free to email us your comments <strong>and</strong>/or<br />

suggestions for this bulletin.<br />

Kelly Wong<br />

Partner<br />

k.wong@kennedys.com.hk<br />

Meiling Yip<br />

Partner<br />

m.yip@kennedys.com.hk<br />

<strong>Kennedys</strong><br />

11/F Hong Kong Club Building<br />

3A Chater Road, Central<br />

Hong Kong<br />

T: +852 2848 6300, F: +852 2848 6333<br />

www.kennedys.com.hk<br />

2


PERSONAL INJURY AND FATAL ACCIDENT<br />

CASE SUMMARY No. 117 (July 2011)<br />

Plaintiff’s Name<br />

Sex<br />

Age at DOA/<br />

Trial<br />

Pre-accident<br />

Occupation<br />

Nature of <strong>Injury</strong><br />

Multiplier<br />

Award for<br />

PSLA/ Total<br />

Award<br />

Award for<br />

Loss of Future<br />

Earnings<br />

Date of<br />

Judgment<br />

Judge/<br />

Court<br />

Gauchan Som<br />

Prasad<br />

DCPI 2398/2009<br />

DoA: 29/01/2007<br />

M -- / --<br />

General<br />

construction<br />

labourer<br />

Back sprain<br />

sustained from<br />

trying to remove a<br />

metal frame stuck<br />

in concrete<br />

--<br />

$220,000 /<br />

$651,569.75<br />

-- 27/01/2011<br />

District<br />

Judge Lok<br />

Tse Sin Yee<br />

DCPI 1618/2010<br />

F -- / --<br />

Shop assistant<br />

<strong>and</strong> cashier<br />

<strong>Injury</strong> to right<br />

thigh <strong>and</strong> back<br />

sustained from<br />

shelving cakes from<br />

plastic trays<br />

--<br />

$175,000 /<br />

$359,462.40<br />

-- 11/05/2011<br />

District<br />

Judge H C<br />

Wong<br />

Kwong Kin Yin<br />

HCPI 285/2008<br />

DoA: 30/03/2004<br />

M 28 /35<br />

Casual<br />

construction<br />

worker<br />

Injuries sustained<br />

to left wrist, right<br />

knee <strong>and</strong> left distal<br />

radius with<br />

minimal<br />

displacement<br />

resulting from<br />

falling off a ladder<br />

13<br />

$400,000 /<br />

$1,49,557<br />

$393,120 14/06/2011<br />

High Court<br />

Judge<br />

McWalters<br />

Ho Ka Yin<br />

HCPI 134/2008<br />

DoA: 03/02/2006<br />

F -- / -- Student<br />

Suffered neck<br />

fracture - right<br />

femur <strong>and</strong> a<br />

fracture of the left<br />

femoral<br />

supracondylar<br />

resulting from<br />

falling out of a<br />

wheelchair<br />

--<br />

$420,000 /<br />

723,623.40<br />

-- 16/06/2011<br />

High Court<br />

Judge<br />

McWalters<br />

Page: 1/ 2


PERSONAL INJURY AND FATAL ACCIDENT<br />

CASE SUMMARY No. 117 (July 2011)<br />

Plaintiff’s Name<br />

Lo Yim Fong<br />

( 羅 艷 芳 )<br />

DCPI 654//2010<br />

DoA:<br />

Sex<br />

Age at DOA/<br />

Trial<br />

Pre-accident<br />

Occupation<br />

F 30 / 32 Clerk<br />

Nature of <strong>Injury</strong><br />

Sprained neck <strong>and</strong><br />

back, <strong>and</strong><br />

abrasions at right<br />

upper chest <strong>and</strong><br />

right lower leg<br />

resulting from car<br />

accident<br />

Multiplier<br />

--<br />

Award for<br />

PSLA/ Total<br />

Award<br />

$80,000 /<br />

$101,880<br />

Award for<br />

Loss of Future<br />

Earnings<br />

Date of<br />

Judgment<br />

-- 16/06/2011<br />

Judge/<br />

Court<br />

Deputy<br />

District<br />

Judge<br />

Thomas<br />

Lee<br />

Thapa Surendra<br />

HCPI 451/2009<br />

DoA: 23/05/2005<br />

M 34 / 40 Window cleaner<br />

Back injury<br />

resulting from<br />

lifting heavy<br />

container filled<br />

with water<br />

12<br />

$250,000 /<br />

$2,034,095<br />

$1,512,000 24/06/2011<br />

Deputy<br />

High Court<br />

Judge<br />

Seagroatt<br />

Wong Yun Chiu<br />

HCPI 282/2009<br />

DoA: 2007<br />

M 46 / 50<br />

Paper cutter<br />

worker<br />

Back sprain<br />

resulting from<br />

lifting a heavy<br />

basket of scrap<br />

paper<br />

--<br />

$100,000 /<br />

$269,294<br />

(CN: 50% )<br />

-- 29/07/2011<br />

High Court<br />

Judge<br />

Bharwaney<br />

- END -<br />

Page: 2/ 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!