Download Personal Injury and Fatal Accident Brief - Kennedys
Download Personal Injury and Fatal Accident Brief - Kennedys
Download Personal Injury and Fatal Accident Brief - Kennedys
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Personal</strong> <strong>Injury</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Fatal</strong> <strong>Accident</strong> <strong>Brief</strong><br />
August 2011<br />
In Chan Yin Na v Union Medical Centre Ltd (HCPI 804 of 2003), the Plaintiff sought costs of HK$11m<br />
against the Defendants. At the original taxation hearing, leading <strong>and</strong> junior counsel’s brief fees<br />
<strong>and</strong> other charges were substantially taxed down. For example, leading counsel’s brief fee was<br />
reduced from HK$500,000 to HK$406,000 <strong>and</strong> junior counsel’s brief was slashed from HK$350,000<br />
to HK$225,000. There were several other items which the taxing master did not allow or reduced<br />
substantially.<br />
The Plaintiff sought a review of taxing master’s decision, which was refused. The Plaintiff then<br />
asked the court to review the decision of the taxing master.<br />
The matter was heard before the PI Judge, Hon Bharwaney J, who agreed with the assessment<br />
made by the taxing master, save for a few minor items. In his Judgment, Hon Bharwaney J not only<br />
agreed with the taxing master’s decisions, he went further saying, the taxing master was<br />
“exceedingly generous”. He did not agree with the Plaintiff’s submission that higher fees should<br />
have been allowed because the case involved complex issues of medical negligence. In his view,<br />
“this was not a medical negligence case involving extremely complicated science requiring many<br />
hours of work by counsel to underst<strong>and</strong> that science <strong>and</strong> to prepare for the cross-examination of<br />
renowned experts on the subject of that complicated science”. He even went so far as to say that<br />
if he was the taxing master, he might not have been as convinced as the learned master that this<br />
was such a complex <strong>and</strong> weighty case as to warrant such high fees. However, the defendants did<br />
not seek to review any items of costs allowed by the taxing master, so he was not in a position to<br />
reduce any of the fees allowed by the taxing master.<br />
The Judgment also looked at the issue of whether a review of taxation by a judge was a hearing de<br />
novo (meaning hearing it afresh) or whether the judge would only interfere with the decision of<br />
the taxing master if he has made an error of law, or taken into account irrelevant matters, or<br />
failed to take into account relevant matters. While Hon Bharwaney J recognised that a judge may<br />
have the power to re-open the taxation hearing <strong>and</strong> hear everything afresh, he declined to do so<br />
under the circumstances of this case.<br />
1
We hope the Judge’s observations in this case sound a warning to counsel to keep their charges to<br />
a reasonable level. In future, it may well be worthwhile proceeding to taxation of counsel’s fees if<br />
they refuse to accept a reasonable offer.<br />
We are always looking for feedback, <strong>and</strong> please feel free to email us your comments <strong>and</strong>/or<br />
suggestions for this bulletin.<br />
Kelly Wong<br />
Partner<br />
k.wong@kennedys.com.hk<br />
Meiling Yip<br />
Partner<br />
m.yip@kennedys.com.hk<br />
<strong>Kennedys</strong><br />
11/F Hong Kong Club Building<br />
3A Chater Road, Central<br />
Hong Kong<br />
T: +852 2848 6300, F: +852 2848 6333<br />
www.kennedys.com.hk<br />
2
PERSONAL INJURY AND FATAL ACCIDENT<br />
CASE SUMMARY No. 117 (July 2011)<br />
Plaintiff’s Name<br />
Sex<br />
Age at DOA/<br />
Trial<br />
Pre-accident<br />
Occupation<br />
Nature of <strong>Injury</strong><br />
Multiplier<br />
Award for<br />
PSLA/ Total<br />
Award<br />
Award for<br />
Loss of Future<br />
Earnings<br />
Date of<br />
Judgment<br />
Judge/<br />
Court<br />
Gauchan Som<br />
Prasad<br />
DCPI 2398/2009<br />
DoA: 29/01/2007<br />
M -- / --<br />
General<br />
construction<br />
labourer<br />
Back sprain<br />
sustained from<br />
trying to remove a<br />
metal frame stuck<br />
in concrete<br />
--<br />
$220,000 /<br />
$651,569.75<br />
-- 27/01/2011<br />
District<br />
Judge Lok<br />
Tse Sin Yee<br />
DCPI 1618/2010<br />
F -- / --<br />
Shop assistant<br />
<strong>and</strong> cashier<br />
<strong>Injury</strong> to right<br />
thigh <strong>and</strong> back<br />
sustained from<br />
shelving cakes from<br />
plastic trays<br />
--<br />
$175,000 /<br />
$359,462.40<br />
-- 11/05/2011<br />
District<br />
Judge H C<br />
Wong<br />
Kwong Kin Yin<br />
HCPI 285/2008<br />
DoA: 30/03/2004<br />
M 28 /35<br />
Casual<br />
construction<br />
worker<br />
Injuries sustained<br />
to left wrist, right<br />
knee <strong>and</strong> left distal<br />
radius with<br />
minimal<br />
displacement<br />
resulting from<br />
falling off a ladder<br />
13<br />
$400,000 /<br />
$1,49,557<br />
$393,120 14/06/2011<br />
High Court<br />
Judge<br />
McWalters<br />
Ho Ka Yin<br />
HCPI 134/2008<br />
DoA: 03/02/2006<br />
F -- / -- Student<br />
Suffered neck<br />
fracture - right<br />
femur <strong>and</strong> a<br />
fracture of the left<br />
femoral<br />
supracondylar<br />
resulting from<br />
falling out of a<br />
wheelchair<br />
--<br />
$420,000 /<br />
723,623.40<br />
-- 16/06/2011<br />
High Court<br />
Judge<br />
McWalters<br />
Page: 1/ 2
PERSONAL INJURY AND FATAL ACCIDENT<br />
CASE SUMMARY No. 117 (July 2011)<br />
Plaintiff’s Name<br />
Lo Yim Fong<br />
( 羅 艷 芳 )<br />
DCPI 654//2010<br />
DoA:<br />
Sex<br />
Age at DOA/<br />
Trial<br />
Pre-accident<br />
Occupation<br />
F 30 / 32 Clerk<br />
Nature of <strong>Injury</strong><br />
Sprained neck <strong>and</strong><br />
back, <strong>and</strong><br />
abrasions at right<br />
upper chest <strong>and</strong><br />
right lower leg<br />
resulting from car<br />
accident<br />
Multiplier<br />
--<br />
Award for<br />
PSLA/ Total<br />
Award<br />
$80,000 /<br />
$101,880<br />
Award for<br />
Loss of Future<br />
Earnings<br />
Date of<br />
Judgment<br />
-- 16/06/2011<br />
Judge/<br />
Court<br />
Deputy<br />
District<br />
Judge<br />
Thomas<br />
Lee<br />
Thapa Surendra<br />
HCPI 451/2009<br />
DoA: 23/05/2005<br />
M 34 / 40 Window cleaner<br />
Back injury<br />
resulting from<br />
lifting heavy<br />
container filled<br />
with water<br />
12<br />
$250,000 /<br />
$2,034,095<br />
$1,512,000 24/06/2011<br />
Deputy<br />
High Court<br />
Judge<br />
Seagroatt<br />
Wong Yun Chiu<br />
HCPI 282/2009<br />
DoA: 2007<br />
M 46 / 50<br />
Paper cutter<br />
worker<br />
Back sprain<br />
resulting from<br />
lifting a heavy<br />
basket of scrap<br />
paper<br />
--<br />
$100,000 /<br />
$269,294<br />
(CN: 50% )<br />
-- 29/07/2011<br />
High Court<br />
Judge<br />
Bharwaney<br />
- END -<br />
Page: 2/ 2