19.03.2014 Views

Download Personal Injury and Fatal Accident Brief - Kennedys

Download Personal Injury and Fatal Accident Brief - Kennedys

Download Personal Injury and Fatal Accident Brief - Kennedys

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Personal</strong> <strong>Injury</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Fatal</strong> <strong>Accident</strong> <strong>Brief</strong><br />

September 2010<br />

Welcome to the September edition of the <strong>Personal</strong> <strong>Injury</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Fatal</strong> <strong>Accident</strong> <strong>Brief</strong>, where we<br />

discuss injury arising out of the course of employment <strong>and</strong> entitlement to employees’<br />

compensation.<br />

Whilst injury sustained by an employee attending a social gathering organised by their employer is<br />

likely to be regarded as “arising out of employment”, an employee who continues to celebrate on<br />

their own following the end of a work gathering brings themselves outside the scope of<br />

employment.<br />

The recent decision of Chan Ho Yuen v Multi Circuit Board (China) Limited clarifies this point.<br />

In the case, the employer organised an annual dinner for its Hong Kong staff, held in a hotel in<br />

Shenzhen. Employees were free to decide whether or not to attend the annual dinner, <strong>and</strong> anyone<br />

who chose not to attend stayed behind in the office to work.<br />

The employer provided factory vehicles to take employees from Huanggang Customs Port to/from<br />

the hotel. The employer also specified that drivers of these vehicles were not allowed to consume<br />

alcohol at the annual dinner.<br />

At the finish of the annual dinner, three employees went to a karaoke parlour to continue drinking.<br />

On the way back, the car driven by one of the three employees was involved in a crash into a barrier<br />

near the China/Hong Kong border, which resulted in the death of one employee <strong>and</strong> the serious<br />

injury of another.<br />

The family of the deceased <strong>and</strong> the injured employee argued that they were entitled to employees’<br />

compensation since the accident arose out of <strong>and</strong> in the course of employment. They alleged that<br />

the deceased <strong>and</strong> the injured employee went to the karaoke parlour to discuss business <strong>and</strong><br />

therefore, they were not out on an evening of their own.<br />

The Court disagreed <strong>and</strong> held that the accident did not arise out of the course of employment. It<br />

made the following observations:


An employee attending a social gathering organised by their employer is within the course of<br />

employment because the function benefits the work carried out by the employee. The<br />

employee <strong>and</strong> the function would be under the control of the employer. In this case, whilst the<br />

employees were free to select as to whether or not to attend the annual dinner, anyone who<br />

chose not to attend would have to stay in the office <strong>and</strong> work. Attending the annual dinner thus<br />

falls within the course of employment.<br />

The three employees in this case visited the karaoke parlour solely for their private<br />

entertainment. This constituted a break in the course of employment.<br />

The three employees could have taken the transportation provided by the employer after the<br />

annual dinner to return to Hong Kong, but they decided not to <strong>and</strong> visited the karaoke parlour<br />

instead. There was a deviation from the journey planned by the employer, a journey which the<br />

employer had no control over. This brought the journey from the karaoke parlour to the border<br />

outside the course of employment of the deceased <strong>and</strong> the injured employee.<br />

Accordingly, their claims for employees’ compensation were dismissed by the Court.<br />

We are always looking for feedback so please feel free to email us your comments <strong>and</strong>/or<br />

suggestions for this bulletin.<br />

Kelly Wong<br />

Partner<br />

k.wong@kennedys.com.hk<br />

Meiling Yip<br />

Partner<br />

m.yip@kennedys.com.hk<br />

<strong>Kennedys</strong><br />

11/F Hong Kong Club Building<br />

3A Chater Road, Central<br />

Hong Kong<br />

T +852 2848 6300, F +852 2848 6333


PERSONAL INJURY AND FATAL ACCIDENT<br />

CASE SUMMARY No. 107 (Aug 2010)<br />

Plaintiff’s Name<br />

Sex<br />

Age at<br />

DOA/<br />

Trial<br />

Pre-accident<br />

Occupation<br />

Nature of <strong>Injury</strong><br />

Multiplier<br />

Award for<br />

PSLA/ Total<br />

Award<br />

Award for<br />

Loss of Future<br />

Earnings<br />

Date of<br />

Judgment<br />

Judge/<br />

Court<br />

Fu Chuen Sing<br />

DCPI 2135/2009<br />

DoA: 05/08/2010<br />

Lam Po Wai<br />

HCPI 695/2008<br />

DoA: 19/10/2005<br />

M --<br />

M --<br />

Distributor (on<br />

overnight shift)<br />

Lighting<br />

Engineer<br />

Sprained back whilst<br />

trying to prevent the<br />

falling of papers<br />

Injuries to right h<strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> wrist as a result<br />

of losing balance<br />

after stepping on a<br />

socket board<br />

--<br />

13<br />

$50,000 /<br />

$70,124.15<br />

$220,000 /<br />

$2,858,085.63<br />

-- 05/08/2010<br />

$1,526,124.60<br />

12/08/10<br />

(Date of<br />

h<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

down<br />

judgment :<br />

24/08/2010)<br />

Master S.<br />

Lo<br />

Hon Rogers<br />

VP<br />

- END -<br />

Page: 1/ 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!