Download Personal Injury and Fatal Accident Brief - Kennedys
Download Personal Injury and Fatal Accident Brief - Kennedys
Download Personal Injury and Fatal Accident Brief - Kennedys
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Personal</strong> <strong>Injury</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Fatal</strong> <strong>Accident</strong> <strong>Brief</strong><br />
September 2010<br />
Welcome to the September edition of the <strong>Personal</strong> <strong>Injury</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Fatal</strong> <strong>Accident</strong> <strong>Brief</strong>, where we<br />
discuss injury arising out of the course of employment <strong>and</strong> entitlement to employees’<br />
compensation.<br />
Whilst injury sustained by an employee attending a social gathering organised by their employer is<br />
likely to be regarded as “arising out of employment”, an employee who continues to celebrate on<br />
their own following the end of a work gathering brings themselves outside the scope of<br />
employment.<br />
The recent decision of Chan Ho Yuen v Multi Circuit Board (China) Limited clarifies this point.<br />
In the case, the employer organised an annual dinner for its Hong Kong staff, held in a hotel in<br />
Shenzhen. Employees were free to decide whether or not to attend the annual dinner, <strong>and</strong> anyone<br />
who chose not to attend stayed behind in the office to work.<br />
The employer provided factory vehicles to take employees from Huanggang Customs Port to/from<br />
the hotel. The employer also specified that drivers of these vehicles were not allowed to consume<br />
alcohol at the annual dinner.<br />
At the finish of the annual dinner, three employees went to a karaoke parlour to continue drinking.<br />
On the way back, the car driven by one of the three employees was involved in a crash into a barrier<br />
near the China/Hong Kong border, which resulted in the death of one employee <strong>and</strong> the serious<br />
injury of another.<br />
The family of the deceased <strong>and</strong> the injured employee argued that they were entitled to employees’<br />
compensation since the accident arose out of <strong>and</strong> in the course of employment. They alleged that<br />
the deceased <strong>and</strong> the injured employee went to the karaoke parlour to discuss business <strong>and</strong><br />
therefore, they were not out on an evening of their own.<br />
The Court disagreed <strong>and</strong> held that the accident did not arise out of the course of employment. It<br />
made the following observations:
An employee attending a social gathering organised by their employer is within the course of<br />
employment because the function benefits the work carried out by the employee. The<br />
employee <strong>and</strong> the function would be under the control of the employer. In this case, whilst the<br />
employees were free to select as to whether or not to attend the annual dinner, anyone who<br />
chose not to attend would have to stay in the office <strong>and</strong> work. Attending the annual dinner thus<br />
falls within the course of employment.<br />
The three employees in this case visited the karaoke parlour solely for their private<br />
entertainment. This constituted a break in the course of employment.<br />
The three employees could have taken the transportation provided by the employer after the<br />
annual dinner to return to Hong Kong, but they decided not to <strong>and</strong> visited the karaoke parlour<br />
instead. There was a deviation from the journey planned by the employer, a journey which the<br />
employer had no control over. This brought the journey from the karaoke parlour to the border<br />
outside the course of employment of the deceased <strong>and</strong> the injured employee.<br />
Accordingly, their claims for employees’ compensation were dismissed by the Court.<br />
We are always looking for feedback so please feel free to email us your comments <strong>and</strong>/or<br />
suggestions for this bulletin.<br />
Kelly Wong<br />
Partner<br />
k.wong@kennedys.com.hk<br />
Meiling Yip<br />
Partner<br />
m.yip@kennedys.com.hk<br />
<strong>Kennedys</strong><br />
11/F Hong Kong Club Building<br />
3A Chater Road, Central<br />
Hong Kong<br />
T +852 2848 6300, F +852 2848 6333
PERSONAL INJURY AND FATAL ACCIDENT<br />
CASE SUMMARY No. 107 (Aug 2010)<br />
Plaintiff’s Name<br />
Sex<br />
Age at<br />
DOA/<br />
Trial<br />
Pre-accident<br />
Occupation<br />
Nature of <strong>Injury</strong><br />
Multiplier<br />
Award for<br />
PSLA/ Total<br />
Award<br />
Award for<br />
Loss of Future<br />
Earnings<br />
Date of<br />
Judgment<br />
Judge/<br />
Court<br />
Fu Chuen Sing<br />
DCPI 2135/2009<br />
DoA: 05/08/2010<br />
Lam Po Wai<br />
HCPI 695/2008<br />
DoA: 19/10/2005<br />
M --<br />
M --<br />
Distributor (on<br />
overnight shift)<br />
Lighting<br />
Engineer<br />
Sprained back whilst<br />
trying to prevent the<br />
falling of papers<br />
Injuries to right h<strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> wrist as a result<br />
of losing balance<br />
after stepping on a<br />
socket board<br />
--<br />
13<br />
$50,000 /<br />
$70,124.15<br />
$220,000 /<br />
$2,858,085.63<br />
-- 05/08/2010<br />
$1,526,124.60<br />
12/08/10<br />
(Date of<br />
h<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
down<br />
judgment :<br />
24/08/2010)<br />
Master S.<br />
Lo<br />
Hon Rogers<br />
VP<br />
- END -<br />
Page: 1/ 1