JPMorgan - KASE
JPMorgan - KASE JPMorgan - KASE
The following table sets out our total sales from our Upstream operations: 2000 1999 (MMbbls) (%) (MMbbls) (%) Crude oil exports ...................................... 1.08 3.6 0.65 2.67 CrudeoiltransferredtoDownstream ..................... 6.83 22.5 — — Crude oil transferred to Downstream and subsequently exported ........................................... 9.58 31.5 — — Crude oil transferred to Downstream by joint ventures (50%) 1.80 5.9 — — Crude oil sold to HOP in Quarter 1, 2000 .................. 6.29 20.7 — — Royalty payments ...................................... 1.32 4.3 — — Crude oil domestic sales ................................ 3.48 11.5 23.85 97.33 Totalcrudeoilsalesortransfers ......................... 30.38 100.0 24.50 100.0 Revenue Revenue increased significantly to $523.2 million in 2000 compared with $155.2 million in 1999. Of the total increase of $368.0 million, $216.0 million reflects revenues of HOP, which we acquired on March 31, 2000, $76.0 million was attributable to increased prices realized on crude oil sales, $72.0 million was attributable to the increased crude oil production and the remaining $4.0 million reflected an increase in interest and other income. Sales volumes, including sales generated from crude purchased from third parties, were 31.7 MMbbls (86,651 BOPD) in 2000 with 34% exported, 34% sold domestically and 32% refined and sold as products through the Downstream division compared to 24.1 MMbbls (65,971 BOPD) in 1999. Our average realized price for total crude oil sales (after excluding the oil refined and sold as products) was $14.12 per barrel in 2000 compared with $6.36 per barrel in 1999. Exporting 34% of the sales volume and higher world oil prices led to this increase. The average realization for exports was $19.34 per barrel in 2000 and the average realization for crude sold domestically or for delivery to meet royalty-in-kind obligations was $8.90 per barrel in 2000. The average price realized for domestic refined products was $19.59 per barrel in 2000. Total crude oil revenue can be analyzed as follows: 2000 1999 Quantity Sold Net Realized Price Revenue Quantity Sold Net Realized Price Revenue (MMbbls) ($ per Bbl) ($000’s) (MMbbls) ($ per Bbl) ($000’s) CrudesalessoldFCA ........... 10.66 19.52 208,078 0.65 6.80 4,419 Royalty payments ............. 1.32 8.60 11,358 — — — Crude oil domestic sales ........ 9.77 8.37 81,780 23.85 6.23 148,628 Total ........................ 21.75 13.85 301,216 24.50 6.25 153,047 The increase in FCA differentials primarily resulted from increases in transportation tariffs. Expenses Production Our production expenses were $34.4 million for the year ended December 31, 1999 and $35.3 million for 2000. Production expenses remained relatively constant between 1999 and 2000, despite a 30% increase in production, due to operational efficiencies realized in 2000 and resulting economies of scale. On a per barrel basis, production expenses decreased by 21% from $1.46 per barrel in 1999 to $1.15 per barrel of oil produced in 2000. 48
Royalties Royalties increased from $0.71 per barrel of oil sold in 1999 to $1.10 per barrel of oil sold in 2000. The increase was due to the increase in production volumes and the increase in world oil prices. The total royalty expense for 2000 was $33.7 million and the overall percentage was 9.95%, compared to a total royalty expense of $16.7 million and an overall percentage of 9.18%. The table below indicates the royalty paid in kind and cash by quarter in 2000 and 1999. 2000 1999 Royalty in Kind Cash Royalty Total Royalty Royalty in Kind Cash Royalty Total Royalty Quarter ending ($000’s) March31 .............................. — 5,694 5,694 — 1,428 1,428 June30 ............................... 785 4,912 5,697 — 3,010 3,010 September 30 .......................... 5,563 1,401 6,964 — 4,190 4,190 December31 .......................... 9,548 5,806 15,354 — 8,024 8,024 Total Royalty .......................... 15,896 17,813 33,709 — 16,652 16,652 In addition, we incurred production bonuses, which are based on cumulative production levels, of $0.3 million for South Kumkol (compared to $0.2 million in 1999) and $3.6 million for Kumkol South (compared to $2.3 million in 1999). Transportation Transportation costs were comprised entirely of pipeline tariffs, which rose in 2000 to $0.82 per barrel of oil sold from $0.71 per barrel of oil sold in 1999. This 16% increase reflected an increase in domestic pipeline tariffs during 2000. As a result, our transportation costs increased $8.2 million from $17.0 million for the year ended December 31, 1999 to $25.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2000. Refining Refining expenses were $12.6 million in 2000 compared to $2.2 million in 1999. In 2000, these expenses represented the costs to refine oil whether the oil was processed for third parties, under toll processing arrangements or for our account. In 1999, they represented processing fees paid by us to refine our crude oil. Crude Oil and Refined Products Purchases Crude oil and refined products purchases costs were $48.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2000 and related to the acquisition of crude oil for processing and subsequent resale as refined products and the acquisition of refined products for resale. No comparable data are available for 1999, as we had not yet acquired the HOP refinery and were not engaged in the Downstream sale of refined products. Selling Selling expenses in 2000 were $7.7 million and represent the costs incurred to operate our seven distribution centers in Kazakhstan. Prior to our acquisition of the HOP refinery, we were not engaged in the Downstream sale of refined products; therefore, no comparable data for 1999 are available. General and Administrative General and administrative expenses were $44.6 million in 2000 compared to $35.0 million in 1999. The $9.6 million increase related to the additional general and administrative expenses following our acquisition of HOP, offset in part by cost control measures undertaken by us in 2000. Upstream general and administrative expenses were $30.4 million for 2000 as compared to 49
- Page 7 and 8: Unless otherwise indicated, all ref
- Page 9 and 10: Notice to New Hampshire Residents N
- Page 11 and 12: Offering Memorandum Summary This su
- Page 13 and 14: have a network of sales, storage an
- Page 15 and 16: Š our QAM pipeline construction pr
- Page 17 and 18: a senior intercompany loan to HKM.
- Page 19 and 20: Organizational Structure The follow
- Page 21 and 22: Nine Months Ended Year Ended Decemb
- Page 23 and 24: Year Ended December 31, 2001 Nine M
- Page 25 and 26: construction of the plant, anticipa
- Page 27 and 28: Inadequate infrastructure could adv
- Page 29 and 30: fully prohibit us from doing so. In
- Page 31 and 32: Kazakhstan’s foreign investment,
- Page 33 and 34: subsoil user and the Kazakhstani go
- Page 35 and 36: In general, estimates of economical
- Page 37 and 38: thereon and any other amounts owed
- Page 39 and 40: Selected Historical Consolidated Fi
- Page 41 and 42: Management’s Discussion and Analy
- Page 43 and 44: (11,642 tonnes per day) in Septembe
- Page 45 and 46: Adoption of Certain Accounting Stan
- Page 47 and 48: The following table sets out the so
- Page 49 and 50: The total royalty and tax expense f
- Page 51 and 52: perform a quarterly ceiling test. T
- Page 53 and 54: The increase in FCA differentials p
- Page 55 and 56: In addition, we incurred production
- Page 57: plan. The CCAA plan was implemented
- Page 61 and 62: Cash is managed centrally through t
- Page 63 and 64: Š completion of the gas utilizatio
- Page 65 and 66: Competitive Strengths We believe th
- Page 67 and 68: Š refurbishing and recommissioning
- Page 69 and 70: The daily business of Kazgermunai i
- Page 71 and 72: Kumkol North. We have a 50% interes
- Page 73 and 74: are currently five producing wells.
- Page 75 and 76: Estimated Reserves and Present Wort
- Page 77 and 78: The following table sets forth a re
- Page 79 and 80: The following tables show our avera
- Page 81 and 82: amended in April 1999, required Kaz
- Page 83 and 84: price we paid for the shares of HKM
- Page 85 and 86: expenditures or investments. The ag
- Page 87 and 88: Several investments with high profi
- Page 89 and 90: In addition, we have opened new rou
- Page 91 and 92: On January 8, 2003, the President o
- Page 93 and 94: As a result of these discussions, H
- Page 95 and 96: Management Directors and Senior Man
- Page 97 and 98: and managerial positions. In 1992,
- Page 99 and 100: approved by our shareholders in Nov
- Page 101 and 102: Related Party Transactions Set fort
- Page 103 and 104: Indebtedness of Directors and Senio
- Page 105 and 106: Prepayments HKM may voluntarily pre
- Page 107 and 108: guarantees any Indebtedness of an O
Royalties<br />
Royalties increased from $0.71 per barrel of oil sold in 1999 to $1.10 per barrel of oil sold in 2000.<br />
The increase was due to the increase in production volumes and the increase in world oil prices.<br />
The total royalty expense for 2000 was $33.7 million and the overall percentage was 9.95%,<br />
compared to a total royalty expense of $16.7 million and an overall percentage of 9.18%.<br />
The table below indicates the royalty paid in kind and cash by quarter in 2000 and 1999.<br />
2000 1999<br />
Royalty<br />
in Kind<br />
Cash<br />
Royalty<br />
Total<br />
Royalty<br />
Royalty<br />
in Kind<br />
Cash<br />
Royalty<br />
Total<br />
Royalty<br />
Quarter ending<br />
($000’s)<br />
March31 .............................. — 5,694 5,694 — 1,428 1,428<br />
June30 ............................... 785 4,912 5,697 — 3,010 3,010<br />
September 30 .......................... 5,563 1,401 6,964 — 4,190 4,190<br />
December31 .......................... 9,548 5,806 15,354 — 8,024 8,024<br />
Total Royalty .......................... 15,896 17,813 33,709 — 16,652 16,652<br />
In addition, we incurred production bonuses, which are based on cumulative production levels, of<br />
$0.3 million for South Kumkol (compared to $0.2 million in 1999) and $3.6 million for Kumkol<br />
South (compared to $2.3 million in 1999).<br />
Transportation<br />
Transportation costs were comprised entirely of pipeline tariffs, which rose in 2000 to $0.82 per<br />
barrel of oil sold from $0.71 per barrel of oil sold in 1999. This 16% increase reflected an increase<br />
in domestic pipeline tariffs during 2000. As a result, our transportation costs increased $8.2<br />
million from $17.0 million for the year ended December 31, 1999 to $25.2 million for the year<br />
ended December 31, 2000.<br />
Refining<br />
Refining expenses were $12.6 million in 2000 compared to $2.2 million in 1999. In 2000, these<br />
expenses represented the costs to refine oil whether the oil was processed for third parties,<br />
under toll processing arrangements or for our account. In 1999, they represented processing fees<br />
paid by us to refine our crude oil.<br />
Crude Oil and Refined Products Purchases<br />
Crude oil and refined products purchases costs were $48.1 million for the year ended<br />
December 31, 2000 and related to the acquisition of crude oil for processing and subsequent<br />
resale as refined products and the acquisition of refined products for resale. No comparable data<br />
are available for 1999, as we had not yet acquired the HOP refinery and were not engaged in the<br />
Downstream sale of refined products.<br />
Selling<br />
Selling expenses in 2000 were $7.7 million and represent the costs incurred to operate our seven<br />
distribution centers in Kazakhstan. Prior to our acquisition of the HOP refinery, we were not<br />
engaged in the Downstream sale of refined products; therefore, no comparable data for 1999 are<br />
available.<br />
General and Administrative<br />
General and administrative expenses were $44.6 million in 2000 compared to $35.0 million in<br />
1999. The $9.6 million increase related to the additional general and administrative expenses<br />
following our acquisition of HOP, offset in part by cost control measures undertaken by us in<br />
2000. Upstream general and administrative expenses were $30.4 million for 2000 as compared to<br />
49