18.03.2014 Views

JPMorgan - KASE

JPMorgan - KASE

JPMorgan - KASE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

perform a quarterly ceiling test. The ceiling test as at September 30, 2002 demonstrated that<br />

future net revenues exceed the carrying value of the Upstream properties under the full cost<br />

method of accounting.<br />

Income Before Income Taxes<br />

As a result of the foregoing factors, we had income before income taxes of $190.1 million for the<br />

nine months ended September 30, 2002, as compared to $211.1 million for the nine months<br />

ended September 30, 2001.<br />

Unusual Items<br />

We were named as defendant in a claim filed by a company alleging it was retained under a<br />

consulting contract, as disclosed in note 16 to our consolidated financial statements for the year<br />

ended December 31, 2001 included elsewhere in this offering memorandum. The arbitration<br />

decision was received in 2002 and we have accrued and paid $7.1 million for full settlement of<br />

the claim. During 2001, we incurred $6.0 million in costs defending ourselves from a potential<br />

takeover bid.<br />

Income Taxes<br />

The following table sets out the breakdown of total income tax charges:<br />

Nine Months Ended<br />

September 30, 2002<br />

Nine Months Ended<br />

September 30, 2001<br />

($000’s)<br />

Upstream .......................................... 53,369 21,032<br />

Downstream ....................................... 15,478 41,472<br />

Corporate ......................................... 2,171 1,174<br />

Total .............................................. 71,018 63,678<br />

The $7.3 million increase in total income tax reflected the nondeductibility for tax purposes of<br />

interest paid on the Senior Notes.<br />

The corporate tax expense mainly relates to taxes paid by Hurricane Overseas Services, the<br />

company that provides services to our operating subsidiaries in Kazakhstan.<br />

Net Income<br />

As a result of the foregoing factors, we had net income for the nine months ended September<br />

30, 2002 of $117.4 million compared to net income of $146.3 million for the nine months ended<br />

September 30, 2000.<br />

Year Ended December 31, 2001 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2000<br />

For 2001, we generated $169.3 million of net income and $194.7 million of cash flow ($146.3<br />

million after giving effect to changes in non-cash operating working capital items) compared to<br />

net income of $154.9 million and cash flow of $179.4 million ($211.0 million after giving effect to<br />

changes in non-cash operating working capital items) for 2000.<br />

Revenue, Production and Sales<br />

Our revenues were $603.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, which represented an<br />

increase of $79.9 million, or 15.3%, over revenues of $523.2 million in 2000. The overall increase<br />

in revenues was primarily due to a $125.2 million increase in revenue from the sales of refined<br />

products, as well as a $3.7 million increase in revenue from interest and other income. The<br />

increase in revenue was partially offset by a $48.2 million decrease in revenue from crude oil<br />

sales. Revenue processing fees remained relatively constant between 2000 and 2001, decreasing<br />

only $0.9 million.<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!