JPMorgan - KASE
JPMorgan - KASE
JPMorgan - KASE
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
perform a quarterly ceiling test. The ceiling test as at September 30, 2002 demonstrated that<br />
future net revenues exceed the carrying value of the Upstream properties under the full cost<br />
method of accounting.<br />
Income Before Income Taxes<br />
As a result of the foregoing factors, we had income before income taxes of $190.1 million for the<br />
nine months ended September 30, 2002, as compared to $211.1 million for the nine months<br />
ended September 30, 2001.<br />
Unusual Items<br />
We were named as defendant in a claim filed by a company alleging it was retained under a<br />
consulting contract, as disclosed in note 16 to our consolidated financial statements for the year<br />
ended December 31, 2001 included elsewhere in this offering memorandum. The arbitration<br />
decision was received in 2002 and we have accrued and paid $7.1 million for full settlement of<br />
the claim. During 2001, we incurred $6.0 million in costs defending ourselves from a potential<br />
takeover bid.<br />
Income Taxes<br />
The following table sets out the breakdown of total income tax charges:<br />
Nine Months Ended<br />
September 30, 2002<br />
Nine Months Ended<br />
September 30, 2001<br />
($000’s)<br />
Upstream .......................................... 53,369 21,032<br />
Downstream ....................................... 15,478 41,472<br />
Corporate ......................................... 2,171 1,174<br />
Total .............................................. 71,018 63,678<br />
The $7.3 million increase in total income tax reflected the nondeductibility for tax purposes of<br />
interest paid on the Senior Notes.<br />
The corporate tax expense mainly relates to taxes paid by Hurricane Overseas Services, the<br />
company that provides services to our operating subsidiaries in Kazakhstan.<br />
Net Income<br />
As a result of the foregoing factors, we had net income for the nine months ended September<br />
30, 2002 of $117.4 million compared to net income of $146.3 million for the nine months ended<br />
September 30, 2000.<br />
Year Ended December 31, 2001 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2000<br />
For 2001, we generated $169.3 million of net income and $194.7 million of cash flow ($146.3<br />
million after giving effect to changes in non-cash operating working capital items) compared to<br />
net income of $154.9 million and cash flow of $179.4 million ($211.0 million after giving effect to<br />
changes in non-cash operating working capital items) for 2000.<br />
Revenue, Production and Sales<br />
Our revenues were $603.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, which represented an<br />
increase of $79.9 million, or 15.3%, over revenues of $523.2 million in 2000. The overall increase<br />
in revenues was primarily due to a $125.2 million increase in revenue from the sales of refined<br />
products, as well as a $3.7 million increase in revenue from interest and other income. The<br />
increase in revenue was partially offset by a $48.2 million decrease in revenue from crude oil<br />
sales. Revenue processing fees remained relatively constant between 2000 and 2001, decreasing<br />
only $0.9 million.<br />
41