18.03.2014 Views

JPMorgan - KASE

JPMorgan - KASE

JPMorgan - KASE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

accordingly no compensation cost has been recognized. Had compensation expense been<br />

determined based on fair value at the grant dates for the stock option grants consistent with the<br />

method of SFAS No. 123, the Corporation’s net income and net income per share would have<br />

been reduced to the pro forma amounts as indicated below:<br />

9 months<br />

ended<br />

Sept. 30,<br />

2002<br />

9 months<br />

ended<br />

Sept. 30,<br />

2001<br />

Net income under U.S. GAAP:<br />

Asreported ........................................................ 117,401 146,296<br />

Proforma .......................................................... 115,882 144,735<br />

Basic earnings per share:<br />

Asreported ........................................................ 1.45 1.83<br />

Proforma .......................................................... 1.43 1.81<br />

Stock options vested during period (thousands) ......................... 1,225 1,312<br />

Weighted average exercise price ...................................... 3.05 2.62<br />

Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period ......... 1.24 1.19<br />

The foregoing information is calculated in accordance with the Black-Scholes option pricing<br />

model, using the following data and assumptions: volatility, as of the date of grant, computed<br />

using the prior one to three-year weekly average prices of the Corporation’s Common Shares,<br />

which ranged from 52% to 124%; expected dividend yield—0%; option terms to expiry—4 to 5<br />

years as defined by the option contracts; risk-free rate of return as of the date of grant—4.86%<br />

to 5.96%, based on five year Government of Canada Bond yields.<br />

Consolidated Balance Sheets<br />

The application of United States GAAP would have the following effects on balance sheet items<br />

as reported:<br />

As<br />

Reported<br />

Increase<br />

(Decrease)<br />

United<br />

States<br />

GAAP<br />

September 30, 2002<br />

Currentassets ............................................. 333,554 333,554<br />

Capitalassets.............................................. 382,939 (54,473) 328,466<br />

Futureincometaxassets .................................... 20,891 (6,157) 14,734<br />

Current liabilities .......................................... 164,792 164,792<br />

Long term debt ............................................ 293,197 293,197<br />

Future income tax liability .................................. 17,826 17,826<br />

Provision for future site restoration costs ...................... 3,904 3,904<br />

Minority interest ........................................... 10,357 10,357<br />

Preferredsharesofsubsidiary ............................... 85 85<br />

Shareholders’ equity ....................................... 247,223 (60,630) 186,593<br />

September 30, 2001<br />

Currentassets ............................................. 206,911 206,911<br />

Capitalassets.............................................. 292,660 (45,411) 247,249<br />

Futureincometaxassets .................................... 27,582 27,582<br />

Current liabilities .......................................... 117,170 117,170<br />

Long term debt ............................................ 249,125 249,125<br />

Future income tax liability .................................. 24,341 24,341<br />

Provision for future site restoration costs ...................... 2,800 2,800<br />

Minority interest ........................................... 24,825 24,825<br />

Preferredsharesofsubsidiary ............................... 93 93<br />

Shareholders’ equity ....................................... 108,799 (45,411) 63,387<br />

F-16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!