REPA Booklet - Stop Epa
REPA Booklet - Stop Epa
REPA Booklet - Stop Epa
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
37<br />
Not So Civil Society<br />
‘Woe to you who make<br />
unjust decrees and who<br />
write oppressive laws, to<br />
turn aside the needy from<br />
justice<br />
and to rob the poor of my<br />
people of their right<br />
that widows may be your<br />
spoil<br />
and that you may make<br />
the orphans your prey.’<br />
(Isaiah 10: 104)<br />
The Pacific Network on Globalisation (PANG) organised a briefing for ‘civil society’ in Suva just before the<br />
negotiations for a Pacific Economic Partnership Agreement were officially launched in September 2004. This<br />
produced a statement, later published in Fiji Times, which was critical of the ideology, substance, process and<br />
implications of the proposed Pacific EPA.<br />
Statement of civil society organisations from workshop on negotiations for an Economic<br />
Partnership Agreement (EPA) between the Pacific ACP states and the European Union,<br />
7 September 2004, Suva.<br />
Negotiations between the Pacific ACP states and the EU will be launched on 10 September 2004 and are<br />
expected to be completed by December 2007. There are serious concerns about the social, political and<br />
economic implications of these negotiations for Fiji and the small vulnerable economies of the Pacific. Fiji and<br />
regional civil society groups attending the above workshop submit the following initial statements for consideration<br />
as negotiations begin.<br />
Issues and Concerns<br />
$ The interest of Pacific peoples and their development must take precedence over the economic<br />
interests and corporate profits that drive ‘free trade’ agreements such as the Economic Partnership<br />
Agreements.<br />
$ Services that impact on daily lives (such as education, public utilities and health services) have no<br />
place in trade agreements such as EPAs. These services should not be governed by trade rules.<br />
They are basic human rights that every Fiji and Pacific citizen is entitled to whatever their social status.<br />
$ We express disappointment that no comprehensive people-centered social impact studies have<br />
been done on the sectors that may be addressed in the EPA negotiations. These studies must be<br />
participatory and must be done immediately to inform the negotiations in the coming years. Findings<br />
must be made known publicly for discussion and debate. Furthermore government must not enter<br />
into any EPA commitments until it has examined the economic, social, environmental and gender<br />
impacts of existing free trade commitments.<br />
$ We oppose the requirement that an EPA must be WTO-compatible since WTO rules are biased<br />
against small vulnerable economies such as Fiji. Further, most Pacific ACP countries are not WTO<br />
members anyway. The EPA could make them become members against their will.<br />
$ The claim that these free trade agreements will alleviate poverty (and bring greater peace and<br />
security) is misleading. There are real and proven dangers from an unequal ‘free trade’ system that<br />
assumes small countries like Fiji and Tuvalu can compete on a ‘level playing field’ with the EU and<br />
other developed countries. We want a just trading system that takes into account the vulnerabilities of<br />
small economies, and addresses the vast inequalities in the world today.<br />
$ Before anything is agreed to in an EPA, government must ensure that local people and firms have the<br />
capacity to deliver and take advantage of its provisions. Government must not rely on foreign or<br />
overseas firms/expertise to take over or control the sector or the activity being opened up in an EPA<br />
without adequate time and protection given to local firms/expertise to compete.<br />
$ For the food security of small island economies, certain sectors particularly in agriculture and fisheries<br />
need to be protected for local consumption. Small and local enterprises and strategic industries must<br />
also be protected and supported to ensure the livelihoods of Pacific peoples.<br />
$ We must build our capacity in quality standards and quarantine to a level that protects the health and<br />
safety of our people and the sustainability of our products for export, while at the same time ensure<br />
that the EU does not set unrealistic standards that restrict our market access and the ability of local<br />
traders to export.<br />
72<br />
A People’s Guide To The Pacific’s Economic Partnership Agreement