Guide to Using International Standards on Auditing in - IFAC

Guide to Using International Standards on Auditing in - IFAC Guide to Using International Standards on Auditing in - IFAC

17.03.2014 Views

212 ong>Guideong> ong>toong> ong>Usingong> ong>Internationalong> ong>Standardsong> on Auditing in the Audits of Small- and Medium-Sized Entities Volume 1—Core Concepts Typical audit documentation would include the items below. Exhibit 16.4-2 Risk Response Phase 1. An audit plan that addresses: • All material financial statement areas; • The assessed risks of material misstatement at the financial statement and assertion levels; • The nature, timing, and extent of the further audit procedures performed that respond ong>toong> the assessed risks; and • Significant risks identified. 2. Nature and extent of consultations with others. 3. Significance and nature of the evidence obtained ong>toong> the assertion being tested. 4. A clear explanation of the results obtained from the test, and how any exceptions or deviations were followed up. This includes: • The basis for the test; • The choice of population; • The level of assessed risk; and • The sampling intervals and choice of the starting point. 5. Actions taken as a result of auditing procedures that indicate: • Need ong>toong> modify planned auditing procedures; • Material misstatements may exist; • Omissions in the financial statements; or • The existence of significant deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting. 6. Changes, if any, required ong>toong> the overall audit strategy. 7. Use of significant judgments applied on significant matters in performing work and evaluating results. 8. Discussions with management on significant matters. 9. Memoranda, analysis, details of assumptions used, and how the validity of the underlying information used was established. 10. Cross-references ong>toong> supporting documentation and evidence that the financial statements agree or reconcile with the underlying accounting records. Comments Audit documentation should stand by itself and not need be supplemented by oral explanations. See experienced audiong>toong>r discussion below. Take care in choosing the right population for the assertion being tested. Copies of client records inspected are not necessary on file, but some identifying characteristics(s), such as a number or date, etc., is required so that a person could re-perform the test if necessary.

213 ong>Guideong> ong>toong> ong>Usingong> ong>Internationalong> ong>Standardsong> on Auditing in the Audits of Small- and Medium-Sized Entities Volume 1—Core Concepts Reporting Paragraph # Relevant Extracts from ISAs 230.10 The audiong>toong>r shall document discussions of significant matters with management, those charged with governance, and others, including the nature of the significant matters discussed and when and with whom the discussions ong>toong>ok place. (Ref: Para. A14) 230.11 If the audiong>toong>r identified information that is inconsistent with the audiong>toong>r’s final conclusion regarding a significant matter, the audiong>toong>r shall document how the audiong>toong>r addressed the inconsistency. (Ref: Para. A15) 230.12 If, in exceptional circumstances, the audiong>toong>r judges it necessary ong>toong> depart from a relevant requirement in an ISA, the audiong>toong>r shall document how the alternative audit procedures performed achieve the aim of that requirement, and the reasons for the departure. (Ref: Para. A18-A19) 240.46 The audiong>toong>r shall include in the audit documentation communications about fraud made ong>toong> management, those charged with governance, regulaong>toong>rs and others. The following exhibit lists the typical audit documentation that addresses the reporting or file completion phase. Exhibit 16.4-3 Reporting • Completed audit programs. • Evidence of file reviews (that is, initials and checklists, etc.): – Detailed (manager/supervisor review), – Engagement partner review, and – Engagement quality control review, where applicable. • Information that is inconsistent with or contradicts the final conclusions. • Summary of financial effect of unadjusted errors identified, and management’s response (i.e., adjustments made). • Non-trivial uncorrected misstatements. • Significant matters arising: – Actions taken ong>toong> address them (including additional evidence obtained), and – The basis for the conclusions reached. • If assistance was provided (where permissible under independence requirements) in preparing draft financial statements, describe the nature of discussions held with management ong>toong> review the content of the statements. This would include: – Dates discussions were held, – Explanations provided on the application of complex accounting principles, and – Major questions raised by management. Comments Take notes of verbal discussions with management on significant matters and record their responses. This will help ong>toong> ensure that audit documentation contains the reasoning for all significant decisions made. Include copies of relevant emails or text messages exchanged with the client that address significant matters.

212<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Guide</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Us<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Standards</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Audit<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Audits of Small- and Medium-Sized Entities Volume 1—Core C<strong>on</strong>cepts<br />

Typical audit documentati<strong>on</strong> would <strong>in</strong>clude the items below.<br />

Exhibit 16.4-2<br />

Risk Resp<strong>on</strong>se Phase<br />

1. An audit plan that addresses:<br />

• All material f<strong>in</strong>ancial statement areas;<br />

• The assessed risks of material misstatement at the f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

statement and asserti<strong>on</strong> levels;<br />

• The nature, tim<strong>in</strong>g, and extent of the further audit procedures<br />

performed that resp<strong>on</strong>d <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the assessed risks; and<br />

• Significant risks identified.<br />

2. Nature and extent of c<strong>on</strong>sultati<strong>on</strong>s with others.<br />

3. Significance and nature of the evidence obta<strong>in</strong>ed <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the asserti<strong>on</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g tested.<br />

4. A clear explanati<strong>on</strong> of the results obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the test, and how any<br />

excepti<strong>on</strong>s or deviati<strong>on</strong>s were followed up. This <strong>in</strong>cludes:<br />

• The basis for the test;<br />

• The choice of populati<strong>on</strong>;<br />

• The level of assessed risk; and<br />

• The sampl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tervals and choice of the start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t.<br />

5. Acti<strong>on</strong>s taken as a result of audit<strong>in</strong>g procedures that <strong>in</strong>dicate:<br />

• Need <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> modify planned audit<strong>in</strong>g procedures;<br />

• Material misstatements may exist;<br />

• Omissi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements; or<br />

• The existence of significant deficiencies <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternal c<strong>on</strong>trol over<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ancial report<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

6. Changes, if any, required <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> the overall audit strategy.<br />

7. Use of significant judgments applied <strong>on</strong> significant matters <strong>in</strong><br />

perform<strong>in</strong>g work and evaluat<strong>in</strong>g results.<br />

8. Discussi<strong>on</strong>s with management <strong>on</strong> significant matters.<br />

9. Memoranda, analysis, details of assumpti<strong>on</strong>s used, and how the validity<br />

of the underly<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong> used was established.<br />

10. Cross-references <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> support<strong>in</strong>g documentati<strong>on</strong> and evidence that the f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

statements agree or rec<strong>on</strong>cile with the underly<strong>in</strong>g account<strong>in</strong>g records.<br />

Comments<br />

Audit documentati<strong>on</strong><br />

should stand by<br />

itself and not need<br />

be supplemented by<br />

oral explanati<strong>on</strong>s. See<br />

experienced audi<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>r<br />

discussi<strong>on</strong> below.<br />

Take care <strong>in</strong> choos<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

right populati<strong>on</strong> for the<br />

asserti<strong>on</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g tested.<br />

Copies of client<br />

records <strong>in</strong>spected are<br />

not necessary <strong>on</strong> file,<br />

but some identify<strong>in</strong>g<br />

characteristics(s), such as<br />

a number or date, etc., is<br />

required so that a pers<strong>on</strong><br />

could re-perform the test<br />

if necessary.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!