15.03.2014 Views

2009-2010 Self-Study WASC Action Plan - Julian Charter School

2009-2010 Self-Study WASC Action Plan - Julian Charter School

2009-2010 Self-Study WASC Action Plan - Julian Charter School

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Findings<br />

B. CURRICULUM<br />

B1. To what extent do all students participate in a<br />

rigorous, relevant, and coherent standards-based<br />

curriculum that supports the achievement of the<br />

academic standards and the expected schoolwide<br />

learning results? [Through standards-based learning<br />

(i.e., what is taught and how it is taught), the expected<br />

schoolwide learning results are accomplished.]<br />

SUMMARY<br />

• JCS has made a concerted effort to revise all courses of study<br />

in order to make them standards-aligned, rigorous, engaging,<br />

and accessible for all students. Next steps include a more<br />

robust implementation of 21st century skills along with<br />

interdisciplinary themes and literacies (portion of ESLRs).<br />

• Articulating the standards for ourselves and for our parentteachers<br />

and students (“Friendly Standards” in K-8 and<br />

deconstructing the standards in 9-12) allows us to clearly<br />

define our expectations, to set common goals across courses<br />

and departments, and to create a common basis for assessment<br />

and evaluation of student learning and achievement.<br />

RIGOROUS, RESEARCH- BASED ACADEMIC CURRICULUM<br />

• Staff utilizes content area standards and expected<br />

schoolwide learning results (ESLRs) as a framework for<br />

curriculum, projects and other learning outcomes.<br />

• Curricula materials in core subjects (by grade/course)<br />

provide guidance on how to “unpack the standards”<br />

and teach for understanding. Next steps include a<br />

purposeful focus on 21st century skills (ICT Maps).<br />

• Staff is involved in monthly professional learning communities<br />

and bi-monthly forums as well as department<br />

and curriculum meetings to choose curriculum, work<br />

on curricular development, evaluation, and revisions.<br />

• Processes and decisions are regularly reviewed<br />

and/or redesigned to promote deep academic content<br />

knowledge and 21st century skills mastery.<br />

• Assistant directors and/or department chairs and<br />

curriculum leads assist teams in reviewing rigor,<br />

relevancy (power standards), and alignment.<br />

• Safety Net/special education providers use<br />

targeted, research-based curriculum.<br />

Evidence<br />

• Academic standards/CA<br />

Frameworks/ESLRs<br />

• K-8 “Friendly Standards,”<br />

deconstructing standards<br />

work, and curriculum maps<br />

• Standards-based IEP goals<br />

• ICT Literacy Maps<br />

• PLC, forum, site, department<br />

and curriculum team<br />

meeting notes<br />

• STAR exemplars<br />

• Subject area blueprints<br />

• Pre/post examples of<br />

curricular development<br />

• Curriculum adoption cycle<br />

• Curriculum Order Forms<br />

and JCS “Favorites”<br />

• Staff interviews<br />

• SPED population, 9.4%<br />

Chapter 4: <strong>Self</strong>-<strong>Study</strong> Findings: Curriculum<br />

<strong>Julian</strong> <strong>Charter</strong> <strong>School</strong> Focus on Learning <strong>2009</strong>-<strong>2010</strong> 59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!