2009-2010 Self-Study WASC Action Plan - Julian Charter School

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$4th Grade: Math (page 1 of 3) CALIFORNIA CONTENT-STANDARD ...$

$Kindergarten: Math CALIFORNIA CONTENT-STANDARD ...$

California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2008-09) The California Physical Fitness Test is administered to students in grades 5, 7, and 9 only. This table displays by grade level the percent of students meeting the healthy fitness zone on all six fitness standards for the most recent testing period. Detailed information regarding this test, and comparisons of a school’s test results to the district and state levels, may be found at the CDE Physical Fitness Testing (PFT) Web page. Grade Percent of Students Meeting Healthy Fitness Zones Level Four of Six Standards Five of Six Standards Six of Six Standards 5 20.8 31.2 20.8 7 22.8 31.7 21.1 9 24.5 28.2 14.7 X. Accountability Academic Performance Index The Academic Performance Index (API) is an annual measure of the academic performance and progress of schools in California. API scores range from 200 to 1,000, with a statewide target of 800. Detailed information about the API can be found at the CDE Academic Performance Index (API) Web page. API Ranks – Three-Year Comparison This table displays the school’s statewide and similar schools API ranks. The statewide API rank ranges from 1 to 10. A statewide rank of 1 means that the school has an API score in the lowest 10 percent of all schools in the state, while a statewide rank of 10 means that the school has an API score in the highest 10 percent of all schools in the state. The similar schools API rank reflects how a school compares to 100 statistically matched “similar schools.” A similar schools rank of 1 means that the school’s academic performance is comparable to the lowest performing 10 schools of the 100 similar schools, while a similar schools rank of 10 means that the school’s academic performance is better than at least 90 of the 100 similar schools. API Rank 2006 2007 2008 Statewide 7 7 8 Similar Schools 9 10 10 API Changes by Student Group – Three-Year Comparison This table displays, by student group, the actual API changes in points added or lost for the past three years, and the most recent API score. Note: "N/A" means that the student group is not numerically significant. Growth API Actual API Change Group Score 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008 All Students at the School 5 35 7 770 African American N/A N/A N/A N/A American Indian or Alaska Native N/A N/A N/A N/A Asian/Filipino N/A N/A N/A N/A Hispanic or Latino 23 15 7 710 Pacific Islander N/A N/A N/A N/A White (not Hispanic) 5 36 7 783 Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 22 47 5 723 English Learners N/A N/A N/A N/A Students with Disabilities N/A N/A N8 586 Adequate Yearly Progress The federal NCLB Act requires that all schools and districts meet the following Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) criteria: • Participation rate on the state’s standards-based assessments in English-language arts (ELA) and mathematics • Percent proficient on the state’s standards-based assessments in ELA and mathematics • API as an additional indicator • Graduation rate (for secondary schools) Appendix 140 Julian Charter School Focus on Learning 2009-2010
Detailed information about AYP, including participation rates and percent proficient results by student group, can be found at the CDE Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Web page. AYP Overall and by Criteria (School Year 2008-09) This table displays an indication of whether the school and the district made AYP overall and whether the school and the district met each of the AYP criteria. AYP Criteria School District Overall No No Participation Rate - English-Language Arts No Yes Participation Rate - Mathematics No Yes Percent Proficient - English-Language Arts Yes Yes Percent Proficient - Mathematics No No API Yes Yes Graduation Rate No N/A Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2009-10) Schools and districts receiving federal Title I funding enter Program Improvement (PI) if they do not make AYP for two consecutive years in the same content area (English-language arts or mathematics) or on the same indicator (API or graduation rate). After entering PI, schools and districts advance to the next level of intervention with each additional year that they do not make AYP. Detailed information about PI identification can be found at the Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Web page. Indicator School District Program Improvement Status Not in PI Not in PI First Year of Program Improvement Year in Program Improvement Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement N/A Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement N/A XI. School Completion and Postsecondary Preparation Admission Requirements for California Public Universities University of California Admission requirements for the University of California (UC) follow guidelines set forth in the Master Plan, which requires that the top one-eighth of the state’s high school graduates, as well as those transfer students who have successfully completed specified college work, be eligible for admission to the UC. These requirements are designed to ensure that all eligible students are adequately prepared for University-level work. For general admissions requirements please visit the General Admissions Information University of California Web page. California State University Admission requirements for the California State University (CSU) use three factors to determine eligibility. They are specific high school courses; grades in specified courses and test scores; and graduation from high school. Some campuses have higher standards for particular majors or students who live outside the local campus area. Because of the number of students who apply, a few campuses have higher standards (supplementary admission criteria) for all applicants. Most CSU campuses utilize local admission guarantee policies for students who graduate or transfer from high schools and colleges that are historically served by a CSU campus in that region. For general admissions requirements please visit the Undergraduate Admission and Requirements Web page. Dropout Rate and Graduation Rate This table displays the school’s one-year dropout rates and graduation rates for the most recent three-year period for which data is available. For comparison purposes, data are also provided at the district and state levels. Detailed information about dropout rates and graduation rates can be found on the DataQuest Web page at http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/. Appendix Julian Charter School Focus on Learning 2009-2010 141
Page 1 and 2:
JULIAN CHARTER SCHOOL WASC SELF-STU
Page 3 and 4:
GOVERNING BOARD JULIAN CHARTER SCHO
Page 5 and 6:
Organizational Chart 2009-2010 Gove
Page 7 and 8:
JCS WASC 2009-2010 Focus Groups Org
Page 9 and 10:
FOCUS ON LEARNING 2009-2010 WASC SE
Page 11 and 12:
TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory Mate
Page 13 and 14:
Schoolwide Action Plan 2009-2012 ..
Page 15 and 16:
CHAPTER I: STUDENT/COMMUNITY PROFIL
Page 17 and 18:
STUDENT/COMMUNITY PROFILE Julian Ch
Page 19 and 20:
ETHNICITY The ethnicity of our stud
Page 21 and 22:
Framework for 21st Century Learning
Page 23 and 24:
STUDENT PERFORMANCE ADEQUATE YEARLY
Page 25 and 26:
Chart 4: Enrollment by Ethnicity En
Page 27 and 28:
STAFF JCS increased the number of c
Page 29 and 30:
STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA ACADEMIC P
Page 31 and 32:
students passing English-language a
Page 33 and 34:
CHAPTER II: STUDENT/COMMUNITY PROFI
Page 35 and 36:
PROFILE SUMMARY From the analysis o
Page 37 and 38:
• Recognize need for common asses
Page 39 and 40:
CRITICAL AREAS OF NEED Expand expos
Page 41 and 42:
CHAPTER III: PROGRESS REPORT Chapte
Page 43 and 44:
PROGRESS REPORT In the spring of 20
Page 45 and 46:
Milestones from last self-study thr
Page 47 and 48:
• Building consistency, where pra
Page 49 and 50:
WRITING Action Plan #4 (2003-2009):
Page 51 and 52:
HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAM STRUCTURE Actio
Page 53 and 54:
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Action Pla
Page 55 and 56:
CHAPTER IV: SELF-STUDY FINDINGS Cha
Page 57 and 58:
SELF-STUDY FINDINGS ORGANIZATION/VI
Page 59 and 60:
ORGANIZATION/GOVERNANCE A2. To what
Page 61 and 62:
ORGANIZATION/LEADERSHIP AND STAFF A
Page 63 and 64:
ORGANIZATION/LEADERSHIP AND STAFF A
Page 65 and 66:
• • ORGANIZATION/LEADERSHIP AND
Page 67 and 68:
• Key academic staff includes: te
Page 69 and 70:
• JCS conducts its financial oper
Page 71 and 72:
ORGANIZATION AREAS OF STRENGTH •
Page 73 and 74:
Findings B. CURRICULUM B1. To what
Page 75 and 76:
PARTICIPATION I N AND ACCESS TO A V
Page 77 and 78:
• Staff analyzes, evaluates and m
Page 79 and 80:
• “In danger of failing” noti
Page 81 and 82:
Findings B3. To what extent are stu
Page 83 and 84:
• Develop rubrics or other means
Page 85 and 86:
C. INSTRUCTION C1. To what extent a
Page 87 and 88:
INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES AND RESOUR
Page 89 and 90:
INSTRUCTION AREAS OF STRENGTH • J
Page 91 and 92:
D. ASSESSMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY D1
Page 93 and 94:
• Other reporting methods include
Page 95 and 96:
• Formative and summative assessm
Page 97 and 98:
D4. To what extent does the assessm
Page 99 and 100:
Findings E. SCHOOL CULTURE AND SUPP
Page 101 and 102:
E2. a) To what extent is the school
Page 103 and 104: Findings E3. To what extent do all
Page 105 and 106: ACCESS TO P ERSONAL S UPPORT SERVIC
Page 107 and 108: CHAPTER V: SCHOOLWIDE ACTION PLAN C
Page 109 and 110: SCHOOLWIDE ACTION PLAN Action Plan
Page 111 and 112: Action Plan Item #2 Area of Focus:
Page 113 and 114: Action Plan Item #3 Area of Focus:
Page 115 and 116: Action Plan Item #3 Continued Actio
Page 117 and 118: APPENDIX Appendix Julian Charter Sc
Page 119 and 120: A. PERCEPTION DATA Each year studen
Page 121 and 122: Chart 6: Satisfaction with EF I am
Page 123 and 124: Schoolwide Goals 2008-09 Wildly Imp
Page 125 and 126: D. SUPPLEMENTARY PROFILE DATA Chart
Page 127 and 128: Table 20: Parent Education 1 2 3 4
Page 129 and 130: Table 24: D and F Grades in Math Sc
Page 131 and 132: Table 32: CAHSEE ELA Census (Combin
Page 133 and 134: Chart 14: CAHSEE English 2008-09 No
Page 135 and 136: Table 47: Percent and Average Score
Page 137 and 138: CELDT Following previous year’s t
Page 139 and 140: California Department of Education
Page 141 and 142: % Below Basic 13 % % Far Below Basi
Page 143 and 144: California Standardized Testing and
Page 145 and 146: CST History-Social Science (Grade 8
Page 147 and 148: E . S ARC School Accountability Rep
Page 149 and 150: III. School Climate School Safety P
Page 151 and 152: VII. Curriculum and Instructional M
Page 153: White (not Hispanic) 61 39 55 41 Ma
Page 157: Select CDS to Report: CBEDS Califor
Page 160 and 161: Appendix 146 Julian Charter School
Page 162 and 163: Julian Charter School Four- Year Co
Page 164 and 165: Curriculum Order Form High School 2
Page 166 and 167: JCS Remedial 5707 Basic English 11
Page 168 and 169: 2056 Non-CP Glencoe Algebra 2 CA Ed
Page 170 and 171: JCS Non-CP 6865 US History (Home St
Page 174 and 175: JCS Julian Charter School LC Learni
Page 176 and 177: ICT Literacy Maps or ICT Maps Indep
Page 180: Appendix 166 Julian Charter School
show all

2009-2010 Self-Study WASC Action Plan - Julian Charter School

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?