NEUTRON STAR COOLING
NEUTRON STAR COOLING NEUTRON STAR COOLING
NEUTRON STAR COOLING D.G. Yakovlev, O.Y. Gnedin*, M.E. Gusakov, A.D. Kaminker, K.P. Levenfish, A.Y. Potekhin Ioffe Physical Technical Institute, St.-Petersburg, Russia *Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, USA Introduction Theory Theory versus observations Conclusions and the end MSU, September, 2004,
- Page 2 and 3: Chandra image of the Vela pulsar wi
- Page 4 and 5: HISTORY Old Stabler 1960 Chiu 1964
- Page 6 and 7: Inner cores of massive neutron star
- Page 8 and 9: Welcome to the Urca World 1. Gamow
- Page 10 and 11: NONSUPERFLUID STARS: MURCA VERSUS D
- Page 12 and 13: Neutron stars with proton and mild
- Page 14 and 15: TESTING COOLING MODELS WITHOUT DURC
- Page 16 and 17: SIMILAR THEORY OF SXRTs Cooper pair
- Page 18 and 19: Theory of thermal states of SXRTs Y
- Page 20 and 21: LEFT BEHIND Sophisticated EOSs and
- Page 22: THE END
<strong>NEUTRON</strong> <strong>STAR</strong> <strong>COOLING</strong><br />
D.G. Yakovlev, O.Y. Gnedin*, M.E. Gusakov, A.D. Kaminker,<br />
K.P. Levenfish, A.Y. Potekhin<br />
Ioffe Physical Technical Institute, St.-Petersburg, Russia<br />
*Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, USA<br />
Introduction<br />
Theory<br />
Theory versus observations<br />
Conclusions and the end<br />
MSU, September, 2004,
Chandra<br />
image of<br />
the Vela<br />
pulsar<br />
wind nebula<br />
NASA/PSU<br />
Pavlov et al
Basic concepts of the cooling theory<br />
Thermal balance:<br />
dT<br />
C( T ) = −Lν<br />
( T ) − Lγ<br />
( Ts<br />
)<br />
dt<br />
Photon luminosity:<br />
Heat blanketing<br />
envelope:<br />
Heat content:<br />
2 4<br />
L = γ<br />
4πσR<br />
Ts<br />
T = s<br />
Ts<br />
(T )<br />
48 2<br />
U T<br />
~ 10 T<br />
9<br />
ergs<br />
Neutrino emission: slow and/or fast?<br />
Main cooling regulators:<br />
1. EOS<br />
2. Neutrino emission<br />
3. Superfluidity<br />
4. Magnetic fields<br />
5. Light elements on the surface
HISTORY<br />
Old<br />
Stabler 1960<br />
Chiu 1964<br />
Morton 1964<br />
Chiu & Salpeter 1964<br />
Bahcall & Wolf 1965<br />
Tsuruta & Cameron 1966<br />
New<br />
Lattimer, Pethick, Prakash &<br />
Haensel 1991<br />
Page & Applegate 1992<br />
Schaab, Voskresensky,Sedrakian,<br />
Weber & Weigel 1997<br />
Page 1998
Direct Urca (Durca) process<br />
Lattimer, Pethick, Prakash, Haensel (1991)<br />
n → p + e + ,<br />
ν e p + e → n +<br />
n → n +ν + ν<br />
e<br />
Q = ∫ w<br />
→<br />
ε f (1 − f )(1 − f dΓ<br />
e<br />
ν<br />
2<br />
i f ν n p e)<br />
e<br />
p<br />
e<br />
Q<br />
=<br />
457π<br />
G<br />
10080<br />
2<br />
(1 + 3g<br />
2<br />
A<br />
)<br />
m m<br />
∗ ∗<br />
n p<br />
10 3<br />
h<br />
c<br />
m<br />
∗<br />
e<br />
T<br />
6<br />
Θ<br />
npe<br />
n<br />
ν e<br />
Q<br />
~ 3<br />
Threshold:<br />
27 6<br />
−3<br />
−1<br />
× 10 T9<br />
erg cm s<br />
p +<br />
ρ > ~<br />
2ρ<br />
Fn<br />
≤ pFp<br />
pFe<br />
0<br />
Similar processes with muons : produce ν<br />
Similar processes with hyperons, e.g.:<br />
L ν<br />
µ<br />
n → Λ<br />
46<br />
~ 10<br />
T<br />
6<br />
9<br />
erg<br />
s<br />
−1<br />
in the inner cores<br />
of massive stars
Inner cores of massive neutron stars:<br />
Nucleons,<br />
hyperons<br />
Pion<br />
condensates<br />
Kaon<br />
condensates<br />
n →<br />
p + e + ν<br />
p + e → n + ν<br />
n~<br />
→ ~ p + e + ν<br />
e<br />
~ p + e → n~<br />
+ ν<br />
q~<br />
→ q~<br />
+ e + ν<br />
e<br />
q~<br />
+ e → q~<br />
+ ν<br />
e<br />
e<br />
e<br />
e<br />
27 6 erg<br />
Q ~ 3 × 10 T9<br />
3<br />
cm s<br />
24 − 26 6 erg<br />
Q ~ 10 T9<br />
3<br />
cm s<br />
23 − 24 6 erg<br />
Q ~ 10 T9<br />
3<br />
cm s<br />
L<br />
L<br />
L<br />
ν<br />
ν<br />
ν<br />
~ 10<br />
~ 10<br />
~ 10<br />
46<br />
T<br />
42 − 44<br />
41−<br />
42<br />
6<br />
9<br />
T<br />
T<br />
6<br />
9<br />
6<br />
9<br />
erg<br />
s<br />
erg<br />
s<br />
erg<br />
s<br />
Quark<br />
matter<br />
d → u + e + ν<br />
u + e → d + ν<br />
e<br />
e<br />
23 − 24 6 erg<br />
Q ~ 10 T9<br />
3<br />
cm<br />
s<br />
L<br />
ν<br />
~ 10<br />
41−42<br />
T<br />
6<br />
9<br />
erg<br />
s<br />
Everywhere in neutron star cores<br />
Modified<br />
Urca (Murca)<br />
n + N → p + e + N<br />
p + e + N → n + N<br />
+ ν<br />
+ ν<br />
e<br />
e<br />
20 − 22 8 erg<br />
Q ~ 10 T9<br />
3<br />
cm<br />
s<br />
L<br />
ν<br />
38<br />
~ 10<br />
−40<br />
T<br />
8<br />
9<br />
erg<br />
s<br />
Bremsstrahlung<br />
N<br />
+ N → N + N +ν +ν<br />
18 − 20 8 erg<br />
Q ~ 10 T9<br />
3<br />
cm<br />
s<br />
L<br />
ν<br />
36<br />
~ 10<br />
−38<br />
T<br />
8<br />
9<br />
erg<br />
s<br />
ν e, ν µ<br />
, ν τ
Effects of superfluidity<br />
Cooper pairing at T
Welcome to the Urca World<br />
1. Gamow and Shoenberg: Casino da Urca in Rio de Janeiro<br />
Neutrino theory of stellar collapse, Phys. Rev. 59, 539, 1941:<br />
Unrecordable cooling agent<br />
2. Kseniya Levenfish: St.-Petersburg<br />
Direct Urca -- Durca<br />
Modified Urca -- Murca
OBSERVATIONS AND BASIC <strong>COOLING</strong> CURVE<br />
Nonsuperfluid star<br />
Murca neutrino emission:<br />
slow cooling<br />
Relaxation<br />
Neutrino cooliing<br />
stage<br />
Photon<br />
stage<br />
Yakovlev & Pethick 2004
NONSUPERFLUID <strong>STAR</strong>S: MURCA VERSUS DURCA<br />
Yakovlev & Pethick 2004
Neutron stars with proton superfluidity in the cores
Neutron stars with proton and mild neutron superfluidities in the cores<br />
Harmful<br />
mild<br />
neutron<br />
pairing
SUPERFLUID NUCLEON <strong>STAR</strong>S WITHOUT DURCA<br />
Gusakov, Kaminker, Yakovlev, Gnedin 2004<br />
Page, Lattimer, Prakash, Steiner 2004 –<br />
minimal cooling model<br />
EOS: Douchin & Haensel 2001<br />
Useful mild neutron<br />
pairing
TESTING <strong>COOLING</strong> MODELS WITHOUT DURCA<br />
Gusakov, Kaminker, Yakovlev, Gnedin 2004
SUPERFLUID <strong>NEUTRON</strong> <strong>STAR</strong>S WITHOUT DURCA<br />
BUT WITH ACCRETED ENVELOPES<br />
Kaminker, Gusakov, Yakovlev, Gnedin 2004
SIMILAR<br />
THEORY<br />
OF SXRTs<br />
Cooper pairing of<br />
neutrons<br />
Nucleon Durca<br />
pi-condensate<br />
K-condensate
THEORY<br />
versus<br />
OSERVA-<br />
TIONS<br />
Cooper pairing of<br />
neutrons<br />
pi-condensate<br />
Nucleon<br />
Nucleon<br />
Durca<br />
Durca<br />
K-condensate
Theory of thermal<br />
states of SXRTs<br />
Yakovlev, Levenfish<br />
& Haensel, 2003
THEORY<br />
VERSUS<br />
OBSERVATIONS
LEFT BEHIND<br />
Sophisticated EOSs and models: strange stars, color superconductivity,<br />
localized protons, etc<br />
Cooling of young stars (thermal relaxation stage, t1 Myr; reheating mechanisms) – Alpar et al. 1987,<br />
Shibazaki & Lamb 1989<br />
Cooling of neutron stars with magnetic fields and accreted envelopes – thermal<br />
evolution combined with the evolution of magnetic field and burning of<br />
light elements in the surface layers<br />
Symmetry of cooling behavior with respect to exchanging proton and neutron<br />
superfluidities – Kaminker et al. 2004<br />
The effects of crustal superfluidity<br />
Cooling of accreting neutron stars – e.g., in soft X-ray transients with deep<br />
crustal heating of accreted matter – Haensel & Zdunik 1990, Brown et al. 1998
CONCLUSIONS<br />
There are several very different cooling scenarios. All require enhanced neutrino<br />
cooling and can explain the observations.<br />
All scenarios predict the acceleration of cooling with increasing neutron-star<br />
mass – mass ordering<br />
The cooling of middle-aged stars is strongly regulated by EOS and superfluidity<br />
There should be no mild superfluidity in outer neutron star cores<br />
New observations of the coldest and hottest neutron stars are most important<br />
Other observational evidences (cold isolated neutron stars; transiently accreting<br />
neutron stars, measurements of masses and radii, spectral lines, etc) would<br />
be helpful<br />
New theoretical results (EOS, superfluidity, etc) are welcome
THE END