Report 202 â Proposal to amend Section 304-B IPC Dowry ... - Jeywin
Report 202 â Proposal to amend Section 304-B IPC Dowry ... - Jeywin
Report 202 â Proposal to amend Section 304-B IPC Dowry ... - Jeywin
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
34<br />
for the rarest of rare cases, the circumstances of the case are such<br />
that death sentence is warranted, the court would proceed <strong>to</strong> do so.<br />
2.8 Some of the cases where the Hon’ble Supreme Court<br />
has commuted capital punishment <strong>to</strong> life<br />
imprisonment:<br />
2.8.1 In Machhi Singh Vs State of Punjab (1983) 3 SCC 470,<br />
the three-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court considered the<br />
Constitution Bench decision Bachan Singh Vs State of Punjab<br />
and came <strong>to</strong> hold that where there is no proof of extreme<br />
culpability, the extreme penalty need not be given. The Supreme<br />
Court also further observed that the extreme penalty of death may<br />
be given only in the rarest of rare cases where aggravating<br />
circumstances are such that the extreme penalty meets the ends of<br />
justice.<br />
2.8.2 In Suresh Vs State of U.P., 2001 Cr. L.J. 1462 (SC), the<br />
conviction was based upon the evidence of a child witness<br />
and Chandrachud, C.J. speaking for the Court held that it will not<br />
be safe <strong>to</strong> impose extreme penalty of death in a conviction based<br />
on the deposition of a child. It was further observed that the<br />
extreme sentence cannot seek its main support from the<br />
evidence of a child<br />
witness and it is not safe enough <strong>to</strong> act upon such deposition, even<br />
if true, for putting out a life.<br />
2.8.3 In Raja Ram Yadav Vs State of Bihar, 1996 Cr. L.J. 2307:<br />
AIR 1996 SC 1631, the Hon’ble Supreme Court came <strong>to</strong>