Grade

Free/Reduced
Lunch
Students with
Disabilities
(other
subgroup)
28.6
15.8
N/A
Goal: 38.6
Actual:38.3
Goal: 25.8
Actual:29.4
Goal:
Actual:
Goal: 38.6
Actual:
36.5
Goal: 25.8
Actual:
30.2
Goal:
Actual:
Goal:
Actual:
Goal:
Actual:
Goal:
Actual:
Goal:
Actual:
Goal:
Actual:
Goal:
Actual:
Goal:
Actual:
Goal:
Actual:
Goal:
Actual:
Goal:
Actual:
Goal:
Actual:
Goal:
Actual:
Goal:
Actual:
Goal:
Actual:
Goal:
Actual:
Goal:
Actual:
Goal:
Actual:
Goal:
Actual:
Goal:
Actual:
Goal:
Actual:
Goal:
Actual:
Goal:
Actual:
Goal:
Actual:
Goal:
Actual:
Goal:
Actual:
Goal:
Actual:
Goal:
Actual:
Goal:
Actual:
Goal:
Actual:
Goal:
Actual:
SIG Reading (January 7)
1. What does the data tell us?
The CASCADE data for proficient/distinguished students seems to be correctly aligned to End of Course, but the percentage of Novice students
identified through the CASCADE assessment are too low.
We met all goals in our gap groups on the CASCADE assessment.
2. What does the data not tell us?
The data does not tell us the percentage of Novice students we might expect based on an EOC assessment.
3. What are the causes for celebration?
Proficient/Distinguished subscore percentages are higher than both the benchmark and the goal for the current year.
4. What are the Opportunities for Improvement?
The overall proficient/distinguished percentage is below both the benchmark and goal for October.
5. What are our next steps?
Teachers will give an EOC-like assessment to help determine which students are Novice and provide increased interventions for those students.
44