11.03.2014 Views

Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University

Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University

Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

other workers, with the exception of commissioned work. The law of 1988 allowed persons<br />

who retired at the standard age of 60/65 to work without pension cuts. In 1992, early<br />

pensioners gained the same right, which contributed to the early exit trend (Urbaniak 1998:<br />

196ff). That failure was repaired only with the 1999 pension reform. Nowadays, earnings<br />

thresholds are in place, and pensions of those who continue to work at their former<br />

employer are discontinued.<br />

The main outcome of this chapter is that the Polish pension system provided broad<br />

incentives to early exit before the 1999 reform. Drawing an old-age pension at an earlier age<br />

did not substantially reduce the old-age pension, as each additional year of work was<br />

credited only by 1.3 per cent.<br />

The origins of the early exit trend in Poland can be traced back to many factors. Firstly,<br />

the fact that only employers paid social security contributions in the old system had<br />

generated „constant pressure [by employees] to raise benefits and to enhance the<br />

possibilities for early retirement” (Księżopolski 1997. 342). Secondly, the differentiated<br />

retirement age for workers of the first and second category is an institutional legacy from<br />

the socialist past, and even from the times of the annexation. It has created lock-in effects<br />

and is difficult to revert due to the high coverage of persons entitled to those privileges.<br />

Thirdly, the opportunity to work without limitations while receiving an early pension<br />

(valid 1992-1999) supported the drift towards retirement even if the employers would have<br />

kept them as regular employees (Urbaniak 1998: 201). Especially women had strong<br />

incentives to retire early and immediately take up an additional job (ibid: 196). This<br />

opportunity was also frequently used by disability pensioners due to the low level of<br />

disability pensions (Golinowska/Pietka 2003: 329). Employers had (and still have) strong<br />

incentives to hire disabled workers and to create ´sheltered workshops´ with more than 50<br />

per cent of those workers as such firms are partially exempted from tax and receive financial<br />

support (ibid: 330).<br />

Fourthly, the system has invited early exit after the transition due to the misuse of the<br />

pension system for solving labour market problems. The employees played an active role in<br />

that trend – early retirement pensions for workers from closed companies moved employees<br />

to stop working even if they would not have been laid off (Golinowska/Pietka 2003: 338).<br />

Despite of earnings disregards, the “escape into disability” (Golinowska 2004: 153) is<br />

still favourable due to the old pension formula which may generate a higher income than the<br />

old-age pension, especially if combined with additional wages. Earnings disregards will thus<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!