11.03.2014 Views

Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University

Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University

Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Moreover, “pensions of persons working shorter periods but receiving higher wages were<br />

higher than for those who worked longer and received lower wages, even if they had paid<br />

the same total contribution when calculated for the whole working life” (Chłoń-Domińczak<br />

2002: 138). The qualifying period for the pension under the old system was 20 years for<br />

women and 25 years for men.<br />

Reforms in 1997 and 1998 changed the defined-benefit pay-as-you-go one-pillar old-age<br />

pension system to a multi-pillar one based on defined contributions, where the first PAYG<br />

pillar was based on Notional Defined Contributions (see Chłoń et al. 1999 for a<br />

comprehensive reform report). 25 The new pension rules affect birth cohorts from the years<br />

1949 onwards. A novelty was the introduction of a fully-funded, obligatory second pillar<br />

and of voluntary third pillar pensions. Non-contributory benefits were removed from the<br />

system and left to tax financing. A qualifying period of 20 (women), respectively 25 (men)<br />

years is required only for the minimum pensions. The pension level now reflects earnings<br />

and contributions accumulated in the whole work career. The benefits are actuarially<br />

adjusted, so that “[e]ach additional year of work and contributions will be rewarded with a<br />

clear increase in the net present value of pension benefits, as the accumulated notional<br />

capital increases and life expectancy decreases” (Chłoń et al. 1999: 23). This should incite<br />

individual workers to prolong their working life. However, the reformers did not succeed in<br />

pushing through a uniform, flexible retirement age of 62-65 years; therefore women may<br />

still retire at the age of 60.<br />

People born between 1.1.1949 and the end of 1968 could decide whether they wanted to<br />

stay in the reformed NDC first pillar or whether they wanted to split their pension<br />

contribution between the first and the second pillar. For my studies at establishment-level,<br />

the old, defined-benefit pension system is of importance, as first old-age pensions from the<br />

new system will commence only in 2009. Moreover, due to transitory rules, persons entitled<br />

to early retirement under the old system may retire earlier till the end of 2008 (or even later,<br />

if they have completed the required contribution period before 1.1.1999) with favourable<br />

adjustments in the pension formula (Janiszewska-Wyszyńska 2007; Chłoń et al. 1999: 43).<br />

However, the new old-age pension system is of relevance when determining personnel<br />

policy in the mid- and long-term span and for persons who are not entitled to early<br />

25 The NDC system is an accounting mechanism which individualises the link between benefits and<br />

contributions and credits all lifetime earnings. It differs from a defined contribution plan in fully-funded<br />

schemes insofar as the fund exists only virtually and capital is not built up, as it is still a PAYG system relying<br />

on the intergenerational contract (Börsch-Supan 2003).<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!