Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University
Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University
entry into retirement, the old-age pension for the severely handicapped and the disability pension were taken into focus which had for a long time invited evasive strategies of persons trying to avoid permanent benefit reductions. For the receipt of the old-age pension for severely handicapped persons between the age of 60 and 63, permanent deductions were introduced. With regard to disability pensions, the delineation between the disability pension for persons with general incapacity to work (Erwerbsunfähigkeitsrente) and the disability pension for persons incapable to work in their profession (Berufsunfähigkeitsrente) was replaced with the full or partial work incapacity pension (Erwerbsminderungsrente). However, due to objections of trade unions and Social Democrats, the newly elected Red-Green government postponed the restrictions in disability pensions and old-age pensions for the severely handicapped to the year 2000 and introduced transitory periods. The controversial elements were passed at last in 2001, and ATZ was closed for new entrants from 2010. In 2007, a law raising the retirement age to 67 (Rentenversicherungs- Altersgrenzenanpassungsgesetz) was legislated despite fierce opposition from unions and counterarguments from scholars who claimed that the reform will undermine the adequacy of pension income (Nürnberger 2007, Bäcker 2006, Brussig/Knuth 2007). The proponents saw the reform as a step in the direction of an increase of the factual retirement age and as solution for the financial strain on the German pension system (Reimann 2007; Köhler 2007; BDA 2007). The higher retirement age will be phased in for persons born between 1947 and 1963 in two paces: by one month per year of birth till 2023, and by two months from 2024 till 2029. The presented reform elements introduced several pathways of early exit in the German old-age pension and disability pension system. A ´pathway of early exit´ can be understood as “an institutional arrangement or – in most cases – a combination of different institutional arrangements that are sequentially linked to manage the process of transition to retirement, that is, the period between exit from work and entry into the normal old-age pension system” (Jacobs et al. 1991: 198). Jacobs et al. distinguish between the ´unemployment pathway´, ´the pre-retirement pathway´ and the ´health pathway´, hereby counting early retirement pensions as located within ´the normal old-age pension system´. Ebbinghaus, in turn, recognises six pathways (2002: 134ff), as the utilisation of the early retirement pension is linked to a different motivation and employment history than the standard retirement pension – the early pension 47
pathway, the flexible and partial pension pathway, the special pre-retirement pathway, the unemployment pathway, and the disability pathway. The standard old-age pension is available at the retirement age of 65 years and after a minimum contribution period of five years. Persons who have been insured for 35 years can claim the seniority pension (´flexible retirement age´) which is available at the age of 63, albeit with permanent deductions of 0.3 per cent for every month of earlier take-up. 15 Women born before 1952 are entitled to the old-age pension for women available at the age of 60 after a contribution period of 15 years (with permanent deductions). This pension was introduced in 1957 in order to allow couples to retire together (Jacobs et al. 1991: 190). The raising of the pensionable age set into practice with the pension reform of 1992 was a response to European Court of Justice rulings on equal treatment in public and private pensions (Ebbinghaus 2002: 248). Persons who are severely handicapped can apply for the old-age pension at the age of 60 after a qualifying period of 35 years. The standard retirement age for that pension is 63 years, so their benefit is reduced for every month of earlier take-up, with the exception of transitory periods for persons born before 1944. The old-age pension after unemployment was introduced in 1957. The motive behind it was supporting older workers who were especially affected by long-term unemployment and faced difficulties with return to work (Jacobs et al. 1991: 202). Persons born before 1946 can apply for that pension after completion of their 60 th year. For persons born between 1946-1952, the pensionable age was raised stepwise from the age of 60 to 63. Table 3 depicts the currently valid retirement pathways and pensionable ages within the public pension scheme. A disability pathway is constituted by the subsequent use of sickness benefit (provided by the firm for the first six weeks of an illness or after an accident and by the health fund for up to one year and a half) and of the disability pension (Jacobs et al. 1991: 199). Since the reform of 2001, disability pensions are granted for three years, after which a re-assessment of the health status is undertaken. The new system distinguishes between the full disability pension granted when the applicant is able to work less than three hours daily, and the partial disability pension, if the applicant is able to work less than six hours daily. As a disincentive to early retirement via the disability pension, deductions of 0.3% per month are 15 Those bonus/malus rules are actuarially neutral in the sense that they cover the loss or rise in the income of DRV due to earlier or deferred retirement (Hoffmann 2007: 300). However, for those rules to be neutral with regard to the incentives or disincentives to continued work they may pose (anreizneutral), the current amount of 3.6 per cent per year should rise by half (Hinrichs 1998: 19). 48
- Page 7 and 8: 5.2. Determinants at Establishment
- Page 9 and 10: List of Tables Table 1: Crucial pen
- Page 11 and 12: LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ATZ - Alterst
- Page 13 and 14: older workers, and to preserve thei
- Page 15 and 16: Germany and Poland were chosen as c
- Page 17 and 18: under the factual minimum standards
- Page 19 and 20: Figure 1: Firm-level decisions and
- Page 21 and 22: Figure 2: Decisions and actions wit
- Page 23 and 24: about by profit considerations in t
- Page 25 and 26: concomitantly, the related opportun
- Page 27 and 28: - retirement ages/age limits (Kohli
- Page 29 and 30: In Poland, there exist no in-depth
- Page 31 and 32: workers (´problem group´) and tre
- Page 33 and 34: the view to structural factors and
- Page 35 and 36: The authors sought to analyse wheth
- Page 37 and 38: imposed in Germany, despite being b
- Page 39 and 40: 2.4. Explanations at Collective Bar
- Page 41 and 42: 2.5. Conclusions The depicted theor
- Page 43 and 44: the development of qualitative meth
- Page 45 and 46: concrete, context-based knowledge (
- Page 47 and 48: I had originally intended to focus
- Page 49 and 50: I chose the software MAXqda for thi
- Page 51 and 52: strategy´, resp. ´muddling throug
- Page 53 and 54: Figure 3: Country-specific analytic
- Page 55 and 56: 3.2.1. Overview of Changes in Pensi
- Page 57: the early retirement scheme, and fi
- Page 61 and 62: was utilised already since the late
- Page 63 and 64: 3.2.2. Overview of Changes in Labou
- Page 65 and 66: criteria of what jobs are they are
- Page 67 and 68: With regard to the legal and collec
- Page 69 and 70: Figure 4: Inflows of men into the p
- Page 71 and 72: of the average retirement age by on
- Page 73 and 74: Figure 8: Employment rates of older
- Page 75 and 76: Institutional changes have also had
- Page 77 and 78: environment, prevention of health i
- Page 79 and 80: urdens of the workforce and suggest
- Page 81 and 82: ased on social insurance and their
- Page 83 and 84: Moreover, “pensions of persons wo
- Page 85 and 86: granted to unemployed women aged 58
- Page 87 and 88: not promote a prolongation of worki
- Page 89 and 90: education vouchers for workers 45+
- Page 91 and 92: force had a low work ethos, low wor
- Page 93 and 94: Figure 9: Annual numbers of recipie
- Page 95 and 96: pensioners decreased by 41 per cent
- Page 97 and 98: Figure 11: Employment rates of olde
- Page 99 and 100: preferred way of exit due to easy a
- Page 101 and 102: espective constituency and inhibits
- Page 103 and 104: Figure 12: Fulfilment of Stockholm
- Page 105 and 106: whom a separate pension system is m
- Page 107 and 108: conducive towards the prolongation
pathway, the flexible and partial pension pathway, the special pre-retirement pathway, the<br />
unemployment pathway, and the disability pathway.<br />
The standard old-age pension is available at the retirement age of 65 years and after a<br />
minimum contribution period of five years. Persons who have been insured for 35 years can<br />
claim the seniority pension (´flexible retirement age´) which is available at the age of 63,<br />
albeit with permanent deductions of 0.3 per cent for every month of earlier take-up. 15<br />
Women born before 1952 are entitled to the old-age pension for women available at the age<br />
of 60 after a contribution period of 15 years (with permanent deductions). This pension was<br />
introduced in 1957 in order to allow couples to retire together (<strong>Jacobs</strong> et al. 1991: 190). The<br />
raising of the pensionable age set into practice with the pension reform of 1992 was a<br />
response to European Court of Justice rulings on equal treatment in public and private<br />
pensions (Ebbinghaus 2002: 248). Persons who are severely handicapped can apply for the<br />
old-age pension at the age of 60 after a qualifying period of 35 years. The standard<br />
retirement age for that pension is 63 years, so their benefit is reduced for every month of<br />
earlier take-up, with the exception of transitory periods for persons born before 1944. The<br />
old-age pension after unemployment was introduced in 1957. The motive behind it was<br />
supporting older workers who were especially affected by long-term unemployment and<br />
faced difficulties with return to work (<strong>Jacobs</strong> et al. 1991: 202). Persons born before 1946<br />
can apply for that pension after completion of their 60 th year. For persons born between<br />
1946-1952, the pensionable age was raised stepwise from the age of 60 to 63. Table 3<br />
depicts the currently valid retirement pathways and pensionable ages within the public<br />
pension scheme.<br />
A disability pathway is constituted by the subsequent use of sickness benefit (provided<br />
by the firm for the first six weeks of an illness or after an accident and by the health fund for<br />
up to one year and a half) and of the disability pension (<strong>Jacobs</strong> et al. 1991: 199). Since the<br />
reform of 2001, disability pensions are granted for three years, after which a re-assessment<br />
of the health status is undertaken. The new system distinguishes between the full disability<br />
pension granted when the applicant is able to work less than three hours daily, and the<br />
partial disability pension, if the applicant is able to work less than six hours daily. As a<br />
disincentive to early retirement via the disability pension, deductions of 0.3% per month are<br />
15 Those bonus/malus rules are actuarially neutral in the sense that they cover the loss or rise in the income of<br />
DRV due to earlier or deferred retirement (Hoffmann 2007: 300). However, for those rules to be neutral with<br />
regard to the incentives or disincentives to continued work they may pose (anreizneutral), the current amount<br />
of 3.6 per cent per year should rise by half (Hinrichs 1998: 19).<br />
48