Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University

Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University

jacobs.university.de
from jacobs.university.de More from this publisher
11.03.2014 Views

an unfavourable economic situation. Cases where information only from one interview wave was available were either not considered in the typological analysis or I made it transparent with respective remarks that the information might be unreliable (Table 19 and 23). The interview guideline was adapted to the time of the interview. It was a thin line assessing whether the same questions should be posed to each new interview partner, or whether one could assume a common understanding about certain facts. The first option bears the risk of irritating the interviewee who might assume that the researcher is asking the obvious. The research in Polish firms differed in one marked respect from that in Germany – in one year, I interviewed personnel managers or other persons in charge of the personnel policy of the establishment face-to-face and in the other year, I interviewed shop stewards via phone. 61 4.5. Generalisability of my Results My study has focused on large enterprises with more than 250 workers. The intention behind it was to detect HRM strategies and long-term orientated policies. I assumed that SME apply to a greater extend ad hoc measures in personnel policy when faced with a concrete problem (Benedix et al. 2007: 41-42) and that they do neither have the personnel capacity nor financial resources needed to adopt age management strategies, e.g. subsidised training (Bellmann et al. 2003: 32). My analysis confirmed the size criterion: Polish firms in my sample were on average smaller than the German ones, and all Polish firms with less than 500 workers adopted reactive and ´muddling through´ measures when dealing with age-related problems. Another criterion for the selection of my firm cases was the share of older workers in the firm of at least 10 per cent. I assumed that firms with no older workers have no specified or codified policy of how to deal with them, and that they are generally more negative towards that group of workers (Brussig 2005: 13; Ipsos 2007: 29). Within my sample, the age structure of the workforce had no impact upon personnel policy towards 61 The phone interview brought about equally rich material as the personal interviews. The shop stewards were open and as guarantee of my sincere intentions, only in few cases, the confirmation of my identity by my former interviewee was demanded. 221

older workers, but I nevertheless uphold my assumption that that would be different in firms with a no older workers at all (e.g. in greenfield foreign investments in Poland). I concentrated on the manufacturing sector with a high share of manual work in order to control for the difference in age-related risks in various production regimes (Frerichs 2002; Rosenow/Naschold 1994: 41-44). The four firms from the services sector included in my sample (only one in the Polish case) all had a short-term orientated, but integrative policy towards older workers. The explanation could be that either the risks in the services sector (here: post, banking, civil service, health insurance) are lower (however, Behrens (1999: 83) regards banking as a highly burdening profession with “limited tenure”), or that firms in the services sector hade developed better coping strategies. I concentrated my studies on regions in Western Germany and Southern Poland with average or higher than average unemployment rate (when compared to Western Germany, resp. Poland). That way, I wanted to hold the labour market and economic conditions constant. I however chose only firms which produce goods for the national or international market. That way, I was able to integrate branches of multinational companies, and to achieve more generalisable results. In the course of research, it emerged that the situation on the labour market is not the only relevant structural factor, but likewise is the overall infrastructure in the region which makes it interesting for foreign investors. Thus, those Polish firms in my sample which are located in a region with worse infrastructure (and which are not foreign-owned) have also a less developed and rather short-term orientated personnel policy (see section 4.3.2.). I did not include firms from Eastern Germany, as they have a different managerial and economic tradition and different institutional legacies that would add, in fact, a third country study to my research (Schuster/Stieler 1994; Büttner 2005a). The last selection criterion was the presence of a workers´ representation in the firm (shop-level trade unions or works councils). That served a heuristic function, as by conducting interviews with both parties and collecting company agreements I was able to gain a broader picture on company agency and cross-check declarations and actual practice. Another reason was the expectation that, as trade unions have been active partners in many European countries of management with regard to the use of early retirement for labour shedding purposes (Ebbinghaus 2002; Gatter/Hartmann 1995: 420), the focus on companies with employee representatives generated interesting material for the observation of decision-making and bargaining at firm level. Moreover, there is hardly any large German firm without a works council (Müller-Jentsch 2003: 48). 222

an unfavourable economic situation. Cases where information only from one interview<br />

wave was available were either not considered in the typological analysis or I made it<br />

transparent with respective remarks that the information might be unreliable (Table 19 and<br />

23).<br />

The interview guideline was adapted to the time of the interview. It was a thin line<br />

assessing whether the same questions should be posed to each new interview partner, or<br />

whether one could assume a common understanding about certain facts. The first option<br />

bears the risk of irritating the interviewee who might assume that the researcher is asking<br />

the obvious.<br />

The research in Polish firms differed in one marked respect from that in Germany –<br />

in one year, I interviewed personnel managers or other persons in charge of the personnel<br />

policy of the establishment face-to-face and in the other year, I interviewed shop stewards<br />

via phone. 61<br />

4.5. Generalisability of my Results<br />

My study has focused on large enterprises with more than 250 workers. The intention<br />

behind it was to detect HRM strategies and long-term orientated policies. I assumed that<br />

SME apply to a greater extend ad hoc measures in personnel policy when faced with a<br />

concrete problem (Benedix et al. 2007: 41-42) and that they do neither have the personnel<br />

capacity nor financial resources needed to adopt age management strategies, e.g. subsidised<br />

training (Bellmann et al. 2003: 32). My analysis confirmed the size criterion: Polish firms in<br />

my sample were on average smaller than the German ones, and all Polish firms with less<br />

than 500 workers adopted reactive and ´muddling through´ measures when dealing with<br />

age-related problems.<br />

Another criterion for the selection of my firm cases was the share of older workers in<br />

the firm of at least 10 per cent. I assumed that firms with no older workers have no<br />

specified or codified policy of how to deal with them, and that they are generally more<br />

negative towards that group of workers (Brussig 2005: 13; Ipsos 2007: 29). Within my<br />

sample, the age structure of the workforce had no impact upon personnel policy towards<br />

61 The phone interview brought about equally rich material as the personal interviews. The shop stewards were<br />

open and as guarantee of my sincere intentions, only in few cases, the confirmation of my identity by my<br />

former interviewee was demanded.<br />

221

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!