Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University
Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University
studied areas of personnel policy – recruitment, further training, health and integration management, and employee exit –, the result of which is presented in Figure 14. The figure will serve as basis for testing hypothesis 5. Afterwards, I will discuss the differences and similarities of German and Polish firms in the transportation equipment industry and in the food manufacturing industry. This chapter will end with an assessment whether a country pattern is emerging, which will falsify or confirm hypothesis 6 for the time being, and a final analysis of hypothesis 7. Figure 14 depicts the position of the studied German and Polish firms with regard to the dimensions ´stage of development of HRM strategy´ and ´direction of personnel policy towards older workers´ (see Annex C for detailed description of how the values were computed). 213
Figure 14: Firm typology Firm labels within a circle mark companies in the food manufacturing sector, and those within a rectangle – companies in the transportation equipment sector. The upper right quadrant contains ´good practice´ firms, the lower left quadrant – ´bad practice´. Firm DE-5, Firm DE-8, Firm PL-3 and Firm PL-5 were not included due to scarce material. The X axis is based on an index across four personnel policy domains (recruitment, further vocational training, health management and exit policy). It depicts whether the personnel policy of the firm has and externalising or integrating effect upon older workers. The Y axis takes into account whether the personnel policy of firms has a strategic, longterm orientation and with regard to how many measures (e.g. know-how transfer, ageadequate working conditions). When taking into account the position of the firms on the Y axis, the more developed personnel policy of firms in the transportation equipment sector (value 1 and higher on the Y axis) stands out when compared to firms in the food manufacturing sector which are largely arrested at the stage of ´muddling through´. However, the differences between branches are valid only within the given country context. With regard to German firms in my sample, I took into account the grade to which HRM policy considers the ageing of the workforce (comp. Table 16 in section 4.2.2.). However, 214
- Page 173 and 174: Another result of my studies, which
- Page 175 and 176: sections of this work. At aggregate
- Page 177 and 178: Table 20: Establishments studied in
- Page 179 and 180: 4.3.2. Overall human resource manag
- Page 181 and 182: wages, jubilee awards, or a longer
- Page 183 and 184: dominate over measures which treat
- Page 185 and 186: education, computer literacy, knowl
- Page 187 and 188: the recruitment practice. In the ab
- Page 189 and 190: To sum up, applicants over 50 are t
- Page 191 and 192: training is provided for persons
- Page 193 and 194: Neither hypothesis 2A nor hypothesi
- Page 195 and 196: an occupational safety inspector. B
- Page 197 and 198: The internalisation strategy - job
- Page 199 and 200: supported with regard to the age of
- Page 201 and 202: firms have an even longer protectio
- Page 203 and 204: standard retirement age, the option
- Page 205 and 206: A striking feature in most firms is
- Page 207 and 208: A polarisation in exit preferences
- Page 209 and 210: espective improvements in several H
- Page 211 and 212: That analysis evidently demonstrate
- Page 213 and 214: Figure 13: Procedure of translating
- Page 215 and 216: policy, as they have experience on
- Page 217 and 218: each firm would be needed. From the
- Page 219 and 220: working conditions). Also instituti
- Page 221 and 222: of home country nationals in manage
- Page 223: European corporation which is very
- Page 227 and 228: The qualitative support for the hyp
- Page 229 and 230: eacted to pension reforms which sou
- Page 231 and 232: Germany are more successful in prot
- Page 233 and 234: older workers, but I nevertheless u
- Page 235 and 236: 5. Barriers and Opportunities for P
- Page 237 and 238: At firm level, the neo-classical la
- Page 239 and 240: go policies´ (Schömann 2006: 135)
- Page 241 and 242: differences in EU impact are visibl
- Page 243 and 244: prevention does not play a role yet
- Page 245 and 246: from coal heating to gas and oil, r
- Page 247 and 248: innovative ideas of work-life balan
- Page 249 and 250: term orientated, personnel policy r
- Page 251 and 252: Badura, Bernhard; Schellschmidt, He
- Page 253 and 254: Brown, Halina Szejnwald; Angel, Dav
- Page 255 and 256: Dunn, Suzanne, 2005: “Effective S
- Page 257 and 258: Frerichs, Frerich; Bögel, Jan (eds
- Page 259 and 260: Heidenreich, Martin, 1991: "Verallg
- Page 261 and 262: Kistler, E.; Ebert, A.; Guggemos, P
- Page 263 and 264: Marstedt, Gerd et al., 2003: Alt we
- Page 265 and 266: etrieblicher Personalpolitik und st
- Page 267 and 268: Rustemeyer, Ruth, 1992: Praktisch-m
- Page 269 and 270: Stettes, Oliver, 2007: Impact of Co
- Page 271 and 272: Weitbrecht, Hansjörg, 2003: „Hum
- Page 273 and 274: Annex A: Interview Guidelines (Exam
Figure 14: Firm typology<br />
Firm labels within a circle mark companies in the food manufacturing sector, and those within a rectangle –<br />
companies in the transportation equipment sector.<br />
The upper right quadrant contains ´good practice´ firms, the lower left quadrant – ´bad practice´.<br />
Firm DE-5, Firm DE-8, Firm PL-3 and Firm PL-5 were not included due to scarce material.<br />
The X axis is based on an index across four personnel policy domains (recruitment,<br />
further vocational training, health management and exit policy). It depicts whether the<br />
personnel policy of the firm has and externalising or integrating effect upon older workers.<br />
The Y axis takes into account whether the personnel policy of firms has a strategic, longterm<br />
orientation and with regard to how many measures (e.g. know-how transfer, ageadequate<br />
working conditions). When taking into account the position of the firms on the Y<br />
axis, the more developed personnel policy of firms in the transportation equipment sector<br />
(value 1 and higher on the Y axis) stands out when compared to firms in the food<br />
manufacturing sector which are largely arrested at the stage of ´muddling through´.<br />
However, the differences between branches are valid only within the given country context.<br />
With regard to German firms in my sample, I took into account the grade to which HRM<br />
policy considers the ageing of the workforce (comp. Table 16 in section 4.2.2.). However,<br />
214