11.03.2014 Views

Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University

Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University

Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

in Firm PL-9. However, more material on labour relations in other firms from my sample<br />

would be needed in order to thoroughly assess that hypothesis.<br />

Some findings from chapter 4.3. on Polish case studies deserve a closer look and<br />

discussion.<br />

The Polish example demonstrates the dominance of structural factors upon both the<br />

personnel policy of firms, the translation process of institutional mechanisms, the policy of<br />

employee representatives at firm level, and the attitudes of older workers towards early exit.<br />

Several structural factors are important in that context. On the one hand, the transformation<br />

from plan to market has not yet come to an end in Poland and as long as firms will be<br />

forced to make personnel adjustments, chances are low for an integration of older workers<br />

at firm level and a prolongation of working life. It became apparent that even in the absence<br />

of institutional incentives (e.g. after the lowering of the pre-retirement benefit), older<br />

workers are released and themselves often accede to the release. Thus, one can speak of a<br />

“´constrained choice´ nature of early retirement options for employees” (Naschold et al.<br />

1994b: 153) or “choice of a lesser evil” (in the opinion of my interviewees). The structural<br />

upheavals on the labour market are reinforced by the weaker institutional protection of<br />

older workers from dismissal – in the Polish ´aggressive capitalism´, there are less norms on<br />

the non-dismissal of older workers. Against this background, I regard the planned<br />

shortening of the ´protected period´ of older workers from four to two years (MPiPS 2008:<br />

19-20) as a wrong move, all the more as employers have adapted to the longer protection<br />

period (Ipsos 2007: 39).<br />

Another structural factor is the expansion of the private sector and the related decrease<br />

of the importance of the institution of employee representation at firm level (Bednarski<br />

2003: 149, Jarosz 1997: 65). Therefore, shop-level trade unions do not play a significant<br />

role as defenders of employment security of older workers.<br />

My analysis has revealed also other structural factors which explain the difference in the<br />

personnel policy towards older workers. Firms in regions with worse infrastructure have a<br />

more deficient personnel policy and do not pursue long-term strategies in scarcely any field<br />

of the personnel policy, but rather apply ad hoc measures when the need ensues (e.g.<br />

singular qualification measures on demand). I see that as related to another explanatory<br />

structural variable – foreign investment, as firms with foreign capital have a more holistic<br />

and long-term approach to personnel policy (Pocztowski 2002: 22; Purgał 2002). The<br />

impact can be understood as ´country-of-origin effect´ which is fostered by the dominance<br />

209

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!