11.03.2014 Views

Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University

Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University

Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A striking feature in most firms is that women are orientated towards exit at 55 via the<br />

early old-age pension for women, while men exit at the regular retirement age of 65 – i.e. a<br />

whole of ten years later. That makes retirement a gender issue in the Polish case.<br />

Interviewees explained the orientation of women towards the earliest possible exit with the<br />

double burden of women at home and in work.<br />

Anther interesting observation on the gender issue was the belief in traditional pastime<br />

orientations of men and women:<br />

“Men in total prefer work to being at home, and probably that is (…) generally linked to that that<br />

women prefer (…) home more, (…) and the man always runs away from home.” (Firm PL-<br />

16_HRM)<br />

In firms where personnel reductions were taking place, I observed an intermingling of<br />

push and pull factors of the early exit decision. Workers who meet the requirements for a<br />

pre-retirement benefit or the early old-age pension for women or for persons working in<br />

´special´ conditions are more willing to make use of that option in times of personnel<br />

reductions than in times of stable employment. Their decision is further sparked by the<br />

contradictory movements of the legislator and the ambiguity as to the further development<br />

of the pension system. Especially before the lowering of pre-retirement benefits in mid-<br />

2004, there was a run on early exit. The same phenomenon can be observed with regard to<br />

the expiring early old-age pension as retirees-to-be are uncertain whether bridging pensions<br />

will be legislated in their place. The workers want to make use of the still available early<br />

exit options even if they would prefer at the very moment to continue work, but they fear<br />

unemployment should they be released at a later time.<br />

The interviewees reported that before transformation, most older workers exited at<br />

standard retirement age or on disability pensions (with the exception of workers working in<br />

especially burdening conditions and women exiting in most cases at 55) despite the<br />

existence of early retirement, as the employment situation in the firm was stable and there<br />

were better job prospects on the external labour market.<br />

The decision to retire is further sparked by financial incentives given by the employer,<br />

e.g. more quicker promoting workers in pre-retirement age and granting them wage<br />

increases in order to raise their future pension level, or giving workers who decide to exit<br />

before standard retirement age a higher severance payment or financial compensation for<br />

the difference between the pre-retirement benefit and former wages. In Firm PL-8, the<br />

personnel manager expressed the financial incentives as follows: „At our firm, it pays out to<br />

194

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!