Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University
Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University
Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
standard retirement age, the options to continue work past that age in some firms, and the<br />
frequent practice of employing pensioners.<br />
As can be seen in Table 22, hypothesis 3 is supported with regard to the economic<br />
situation of the firm. Of the firms which did not grant the workers the initiative on early<br />
exit, all were reducing personnel or had done it shortly before the interview phase.<br />
Hypothesis 3 is however not supported with regard to the age of the workforce. Among the<br />
firms which take the initiative to externalise older workers, there are both such with an<br />
´old´, ´average´ and ´young´ age structure.<br />
Table 22: Testing of hypothesis 3<br />
Firm staff cuts in<br />
2005 or 2006?<br />
branch development<br />
between 2004-2006<br />
´old´ or ´young´<br />
firm**<br />
EE as decision of the<br />
worker***<br />
PL-1 No negative young Yes<br />
PL-2 Yes slightly negative* average HRM: no, but free choice<br />
TU: no<br />
PL-3 No slightly negative* young (no early exits yet)<br />
PL-4 No positive young No<br />
PL-5 No positive/negative average Probably yes<br />
PL-6 Yes positive average Yes, mostly<br />
PL-7 Yes positive old 2005: rather not<br />
PL-8 Yes negative old Yes<br />
2006: yes<br />
PL-9 Yes negative average No, but free choice<br />
PL-10 No positive average Probably yes<br />
PL-11 No positive old No, but some decision latitude<br />
PL-<strong>12</strong> No positive young HRM: no<br />
TU: yes<br />
PL-13 No positive young No, but some decision latitude<br />
PL-14 No positive n.s. Probably yes<br />
PL-15 Yes slightly positive* average Yes<br />
PL-16 No slightly negative* average Probably yes<br />
PL-17 Yes negative average 2004: Yes (HRM)<br />
2006: No<br />
Source: Same as in Table 20. The cells with grey background mark cases with personnel reductions shortly<br />
before the period of investigation.<br />
* = less than -1% employment decline, resp. below +1% employment growth 2004-2006<br />
** = share of ´50pluses´ among the workforce in 2005/2006 was more than <strong>12</strong>5% higher/lower as in<br />
enterprises with 250 and more workers in Poland (Ipsos 2007).<br />
*** = older workers are not pushed out and take the initiative to apply for an early retirement pension or preretirement<br />
benefits on their own.<br />
staff cuts = large-scale personnel reductions of at least 30 persons.<br />
The label of ´good practice´ with regard to the procedures of contract termination and<br />
retirement transitions can be assigned in my view to Firm PL-1, Firm PL-5 and Firm PL-14<br />
(see Box 9 for the latter case). All three employers allow to continue work until or even past<br />
192