Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University

Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University

jacobs.university.de
from jacobs.university.de More from this publisher
11.03.2014 Views

or resort solely to reactive measures (as will become clear in the next sections of this work). Firms located in economically more developed regions and with foreign investment are more innovative with regard to personnel policy, and more prone to pursue long-term orientated HRM strategies. The main focus of personnel policy with regard to older workers are protective measures and social benefits and early retirement. 4.3.3. Recruitment Practice The interviews with Polish firm representatives generated more information on the recruitment policy than was the case in my German firm case studies. At the time of the interview with the personnel managers (2005) or the shop stewards (2006), five firms were affected by a hiring freeze (Firm PL-4, Firm PL-8, Firm PL-9, Firm PL-10), but even there, the interviewees elaborated on the firm´s recruitment policy. Moreover, interesting comparisons with pre-transition situation were possible. Just as was the case with the studied German firms, older workers in Poland have small chances of finding a new job. The anti-discrimination legislation has sharpened the awareness for ageing issues and some interviewees reported a dropping of age bars in job ads, either in their own firms or in competing firms. However, theory (equal opportunity) and practice (the results of hiring) are wide apart, as was expressed most explicitly by personnel managers in two vehicle manufacturing firms: “[O]fficially, I can say that those who are 60 and who are 25 have equal rights. In practice, there is more hiring of younger persons, meaning directly after university education or vocational schools, as far as blue-collar positions are concerned.” (Firm PL-15_HRM) “Of course, age is no criterion, it does not appear anywhere, but the result is, as it seems… (…) The result of hiring somehow seems to confirm that mainly young workers are recruited.” (Firm PL- 14_HRM) The transition to market economy has lowered the recruitment chances of older workers in two respects. Firstly, causes were the tight external labour market, and internal ´squeezing´ and hiring freezes. Secondly, the demands for the qualification status of applicants and performance requirements have risen sharply. Whereas before, even workers with only primary school education were hired 53 , nowadays a completed university 53 My interviewees reported that during full employment and labour hoarding, there was a real “hunt for workers”, incentives to join a firm, and even forced recruitment. The basic selection mechanisms were nepotism and governmental orders (e.g. hiring of formers prisoners or persons with mental handicaps). 173

education, computer literacy, knowledge of foreign languages and several soft skills are demanded for many jobs. Under conditions of high unemployment, the firms can afford the selection of candidates who exactly match the job profile. Some interviewees even expressed the opinion that a generational change is needed before workers will have acquired skills needed in the globalised economy. My interviewees also claimed that the formerly dismissal-proof jobs regardless of actual performance have brought about a low work ethic in the current cohort of older workers and have not taught them to invest in themselves which makes adaptation to the present-day conditions all the more difficult. Another development observed by some shop stewards was the lower appreciation and lower standing of older workers when compared to the time before the transition which had a bearing on the general attitude towards them, on remuneration, recruitment and promotion: “So-called older workers were somehow differently reckoned with. (…) [PA: Why has that changed?] I don´t know, maybe therefore because before, as I remember it, I think that older workers possibly were the majority. And they somehow dominated the firm. Nowadays, as I have already said, young folks dominate, and maybe that´s the reason.” (Firm PL-6_TU) Those developments, which were a natural consequence of market adjustments, worsened in my eyes the opportunities for the prolongation of working life. In the studied firms, most new hiring was conducted for manufacturing positions. There, young workers (below 40 or below 30, depending on the firm) were preferred because of assumed better physical fitness. Also the position of postmen and of sales representatives was considered as too burdening for older workers, and even for female applicants. The interviewees argued with the wear and tear as the inescapable effects of working long years in the given occupation – an argument in line with that of ´task-contingent age limits´ built into certain jobs voiced in the German scholarly discourse (Behrens 1999). In opinion of firm experts, older workers do not match the job profile in the sales department, marketing, and in other departments dealing with new challenges of the market economy and with international cooperation and competition. In the eyes of the interviewees, older persons are not fit for those tasks due to “bad habits from old system” – entitlement mentality, ineffective working style, low motivation. Older workers educated in the former system do not, according to the observation of interviewees, speak foreign languages besides Russian, and have no computer skills. Due to high costs of further training, some firms prefer the hiring of persons who exactly match the needed 174

or resort solely to reactive measures (as will become clear in the next sections of this work).<br />

Firms located in economically more developed regions and with foreign investment are<br />

more innovative with regard to personnel policy, and more prone to pursue long-term<br />

orientated HRM strategies. The main focus of personnel policy with regard to older workers<br />

are protective measures and social benefits and early retirement.<br />

4.3.3. Recruitment Practice<br />

The interviews with Polish firm representatives generated more information on the<br />

recruitment policy than was the case in my German firm case studies. At the time of the<br />

interview with the personnel managers (2005) or the shop stewards (2006), five firms were<br />

affected by a hiring freeze (Firm PL-4, Firm PL-8, Firm PL-9, Firm PL-10), but even there,<br />

the interviewees elaborated on the firm´s recruitment policy. Moreover, interesting<br />

comparisons with pre-transition situation were possible.<br />

Just as was the case with the studied German firms, older workers in Poland have small<br />

chances of finding a new job. The anti-discrimination legislation has sharpened the<br />

awareness for ageing issues and some interviewees reported a dropping of age bars in job<br />

ads, either in their own firms or in competing firms. However, theory (equal opportunity)<br />

and practice (the results of hiring) are wide apart, as was expressed most explicitly by<br />

personnel managers in two vehicle manufacturing firms:<br />

“[O]fficially, I can say that those who are 60 and who are 25 have equal rights. In practice, there is<br />

more hiring of younger persons, meaning directly after university education or vocational schools,<br />

as far as blue-collar positions are concerned.” (Firm PL-15_HRM)<br />

“Of course, age is no criterion, it does not appear anywhere, but the result is, as it seems… (…) The<br />

result of hiring somehow seems to confirm that mainly young workers are recruited.” (Firm PL-<br />

14_HRM)<br />

The transition to market economy has lowered the recruitment chances of older workers<br />

in two respects. Firstly, causes were the tight external labour market, and internal<br />

´squeezing´ and hiring freezes. Secondly, the demands for the qualification status of<br />

applicants and performance requirements have risen sharply. Whereas before, even workers<br />

with only primary school education were hired 53 , nowadays a completed university<br />

53 My interviewees reported that during full employment and labour hoarding, there was a real “hunt for<br />

workers”, incentives to join a firm, and even forced recruitment. The basic selection mechanisms were<br />

nepotism and governmental orders (e.g. hiring of formers prisoners or persons with mental handicaps).<br />

173

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!