Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University
Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University
a flexibility resource in times of downsizing, but also for general purposes of creating vacancies and workforce rejuvenation. The training policy in most firms can be assessed as internalising, giving equal access to workers of all ages. The lacking inclusion of older workers in further training in some cases can be explained with their unwillingness to undergo it. Concerning health management and the integration of impaired workers, firms nowadays strive to integrate workers in the regular workplaces instead of providing sheltered workplaces. Hypothesis 2B is therefore supported with regard to further training and health management. Hypothesis 3 (see section 2.2.) cannot be tested with regard to recruitment due to the quantitatively low number of new recruits in the studied firms during my study – which was sufficient for assessing the general direction of recruitment policy (hypothesis 2A/2B), but not its correlation with structural and socio-demographic factors (hypothesis 3). It cannot also be answered with regard to replacement demand in recruitment, as most companies in my sample were shrinking that can be seen when comparing the number of employees at the two interview waves (Table 15 and Table 17). The hypothesis cannot also be tested with regard to further training due to missing age-linked policies in that field, but it is not supported when solely the access criteria of older workers to training are taken into consideration. Hypothesis 3 is partly supported with regard to health management and the termination of the work contract. All firms with externalising policies in the field of health and integration management had to cut staff levels at the first or second time of the interview and suffered from a negative development of the given branch of economy. Also those firms where active pushing out of older workers on early retirement or other form of early exit was taking place were reducing personnel at the time of the first or second interview. The current age structure of the workforce exerted no impact here as driver for specific policies, albeit firms have the ´optimum´ age structure in view as the outcome when carrying through certain policies. This finding is in line with the firm-structural approach (Wolf 1989: 97). Hypothesis 4 (see section 2.3.) is supported with a restriction. According to observations of the WCM and HRM in the studied firms, retirement incentives have evoked expectations of workers regarding an early timing of exit. After the curtailment of some early exit options, workers have adapted their retirement planning, albeit they still cling to the idea of a shortened work life and even accept deductions in order to be able to still retire early. A division into workers who can still afford early exit with pension deductions and 157
those who cannot was reported by firm experts. I thus claim that structural conditions (inter al. rationalisation processes) and the socio-economic position of workers determine whether the individual labour/leisure choice can be made at all. Hypothesis 6 (see section 2.1.) is supported with regard to Germany. The personnel policy of German firms is unlikely to facilitate a prolongation of working life in the short or medium term. Firms have a non-uniform policy with regard to older workers, and contradictory measures are applied within one and the same firm depending on the realm of personnel policy in question. Similarly, ´positive reactions´ are outweighed by ´negative´ and ´no reactions´ to legislative changes, showing the lacking commitment of most firms to a prolongation of working life at firm level. The analysis of qualitative data has shown that the type of reaction to legislative changes varies with regard to different reform elements, as well as that there is no uniform type of reaction exhibited by a single firm, but rather a mixture of various adaptation patterns. The type of reactions can alter as a result of changes on the management board, the business cycle etc. It also turned out that the planning horizon of firms is rather short. Ideas how to integrate older workers and how to still provide for early exit options are at conceptualisation, at best at inception phase. The interviews brought to light only few concrete measures. Possibly, the termination of the early retirement scheme and the retirement age of 67 were still too far away at the turn of the year 2006, when the second interview wave took place. Another factor which rendered it difficult to assess the impact of the raised retirement ages for the old-age pension after ATZ was the fact that in firms which had utilised the early retirement scheme or other early exit schemes to a great extent during personnel reductions in 2004, most older workers entitled to that scheme have already left. Hypothesis 7 (see section 2.4.) is herewith also supported. Due to the institution of codetermination, the management is able to pursue policies of externalisation via early retirement in cooperation with the works councils, which are prone to cooperate due to their unrivalled position as representatives of the workforce. A ´collusion´ of interests of employee representatives and the management still takes place. It has however to be added that this collusion largely relies on the continued interest of workers in early exit. In general, it can be concluded that firms in Germany have a short-term orientation in personnel policy. They do not reflect the development of the age structure of their workforce over the next years. The recruitment of young workers is seen as prime solution for solving problems with know-how transfer, absenteeism rates, or personnel shortage 158
- Page 117 and 118: Difficulties with recruitment of qu
- Page 119 and 120: learning to the needs of older pers
- Page 121 and 122: (Schmidt/Gatter 1997: 168), in Pola
- Page 123 and 124: 4.2.1. Presentation of the Studied
- Page 125 and 126: Firm DE-14 Man. of Transport Equipm
- Page 127 and 128: opinions by adding that similar tra
- Page 129 and 130: Table 16: Focus of personnel policy
- Page 131 and 132: 4.2.3. Recruitment Practice Good pr
- Page 133 and 134: egardless of their individual capab
- Page 135 and 136: “The movements within the firm -
- Page 137 and 138: epresentative or manager). However,
- Page 139 and 140: The interview guideline for my firm
- Page 141 and 142: tear. However, the externalisation
- Page 143 and 144: publicly owned firms (Firm DE-1, Fi
- Page 145 and 146: At aggregate level, the existence o
- Page 147 and 148: means for „exchanging the old for
- Page 149 and 150: Box 4: Good practice in employee ex
- Page 151 and 152: combination of the receipt of unemp
- Page 153 and 154: where workers cancelled the previou
- Page 155 and 156: and the agitation by the works coun
- Page 157 and 158: and on the other side, externalisat
- Page 159 and 160: severance payment in case of the 58
- Page 161 and 162: older workers, without further adju
- Page 163 and 164: ationalisation, and foster adaptive
- Page 165 and 166: with a health management professor
- Page 167: only limited impact (and interest)
- Page 171 and 172: I made out some forms of irrational
- Page 173 and 174: Another result of my studies, which
- Page 175 and 176: sections of this work. At aggregate
- Page 177 and 178: Table 20: Establishments studied in
- Page 179 and 180: 4.3.2. Overall human resource manag
- Page 181 and 182: wages, jubilee awards, or a longer
- Page 183 and 184: dominate over measures which treat
- Page 185 and 186: education, computer literacy, knowl
- Page 187 and 188: the recruitment practice. In the ab
- Page 189 and 190: To sum up, applicants over 50 are t
- Page 191 and 192: training is provided for persons
- Page 193 and 194: Neither hypothesis 2A nor hypothesi
- Page 195 and 196: an occupational safety inspector. B
- Page 197 and 198: The internalisation strategy - job
- Page 199 and 200: supported with regard to the age of
- Page 201 and 202: firms have an even longer protectio
- Page 203 and 204: standard retirement age, the option
- Page 205 and 206: A striking feature in most firms is
- Page 207 and 208: A polarisation in exit preferences
- Page 209 and 210: espective improvements in several H
- Page 211 and 212: That analysis evidently demonstrate
- Page 213 and 214: Figure 13: Procedure of translating
- Page 215 and 216: policy, as they have experience on
- Page 217 and 218: each firm would be needed. From the
those who cannot was reported by firm experts. I thus claim that structural conditions (inter<br />
al. rationalisation processes) and the socio-economic position of workers determine whether<br />
the individual labour/leisure choice can be made at all.<br />
Hypothesis 6 (see section 2.1.) is supported with regard to Germany. The personnel<br />
policy of German firms is unlikely to facilitate a prolongation of working life in the short or<br />
medium term. Firms have a non-uniform policy with regard to older workers, and<br />
contradictory measures are applied within one and the same firm depending on the realm of<br />
personnel policy in question. Similarly, ´positive reactions´ are outweighed by ´negative´<br />
and ´no reactions´ to legislative changes, showing the lacking commitment of most firms to<br />
a prolongation of working life at firm level. The analysis of qualitative data has shown that<br />
the type of reaction to legislative changes varies with regard to different reform elements,<br />
as well as that there is no uniform type of reaction exhibited by a single firm, but rather a<br />
mixture of various adaptation patterns. The type of reactions can alter as a result of changes<br />
on the management board, the business cycle etc. It also turned out that the planning<br />
horizon of firms is rather short. Ideas how to integrate older workers and how to still<br />
provide for early exit options are at conceptualisation, at best at inception phase. The<br />
interviews brought to light only few concrete measures. Possibly, the termination of the<br />
early retirement scheme and the retirement age of 67 were still too far away at the turn of<br />
the year 2006, when the second interview wave took place. Another factor which rendered<br />
it difficult to assess the impact of the raised retirement ages for the old-age pension after<br />
ATZ was the fact that in firms which had utilised the early retirement scheme or other early<br />
exit schemes to a great extent during personnel reductions in 2004, most older workers<br />
entitled to that scheme have already left.<br />
Hypothesis 7 (see section 2.4.) is herewith also supported. Due to the institution of codetermination,<br />
the management is able to pursue policies of externalisation via early<br />
retirement in cooperation with the works councils, which are prone to cooperate due to their<br />
unrivalled position as representatives of the workforce. A ´collusion´ of interests of<br />
employee representatives and the management still takes place. It has however to be added<br />
that this collusion largely relies on the continued interest of workers in early exit.<br />
In general, it can be concluded that firms in Germany have a short-term orientation in<br />
personnel policy. They do not reflect the development of the age structure of their<br />
workforce over the next years. The recruitment of young workers is seen as prime solution<br />
for solving problems with know-how transfer, absenteeism rates, or personnel shortage<br />
158