Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University

Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University

jacobs.university.de
from jacobs.university.de More from this publisher
11.03.2014 Views

conditions, with concomitant receipt of a favourable wage compensation. The works councils are therefore proponents of developing a replacement model for ATZ. Employee representatives in the studied firms always strive for avoiding dismissals due to operational reasons. In some firms or sectors, Agreements on Protection against Rationalisation are being concluded for such purposes (e.g. in the banking sector, in the public sector, in Firm DE-5, in Firm DE-13 at times, in Firm DE-10, planned by the works council in Firm DE-9), and social plans define the priority of „socially acceptable“ measures of personnel reductions over dismissals. Works councils have co-determination powers in case of dismissals, and their intervention on behalf of workers selected for dismissal is usually successful. The prevention of dismissals due to operational reasons was in most cases only possible due to the use of other alternatives. Here, employee representatives played a role in focusing the personnel reductions on older workers. That is sign of a change in the position of works councils within German firms, and the risen importance of firm-level compared to branch-level bargaining (Weitbrecht 2003: 69-70). The works council plays here the role of a co-manager (Schmidt/Trinczek 1999: 117) by preventing dismissals and, at the same time, supporting the personnel management in using early retirement as a downsizing measure (e.g. in Firm DE-3). There were singular contradictory examples to that line of action, of WCM who favoured the termination of younger workers´ contracts instead of releasing older ones, or who opted for the extension for the protection against dismissals of older workers (Firm DE-4, Firm DE-13, Firm DE-14). In the light of those findings, the part of hypothesis 7 related to Germany (see section 2.4.) is herewith supported. The institution of co-determination necessitates the management to consult matters related to the termination of the work contract with employee representatives. Moreover, due to the model of homogeneous trade union representation in one company, they do not have to compete for power and are more prone to compromise. In fact, recent history of labour relations shows a far-reaching collusion of interests between the two parties over early retirement (Ebbinghaus 2002: 48). This section has shown that the degree of cooperation or conflict between the works council and the management differs with regard to HRM fields. While works councils have 155

only limited impact (and interest) to co-decide on recruitment issues, they are a powerful partner on issues of health management and contract termination. In the field of further training, know-how transfer and health management, clashes between the two parties centre on cost containment issues. With regard to early retirement and personnel reductions, there is less disagreement, and a collusion of interests can be observed. Both the management and employee representatives are interested in preventing dismissals due to operational reasons. The works councils play an active role in searching for alternatives and focusing personnel reductions on older workers. Beside the aim of preventing dismissals, the interest of the works council in early retirement is motivated by the wish to release older workers from adverse working conditions with a financial compensation. It has however to be added that such collusive behaviour is possible only under the condition of the continued interest of workers in early exit. In the interviews with firm experts, I learnt that the wishes of older workers to get relief from work burdens while at the same time receiving a wage compensation which allowed status maintenance played a huge role for the forming of opinions of works councils on early exit. 4.2.10. Conclusions In this chapter, I will repeat the results of hypothesis testing given in the previous subsections. Afterwards, I will conduct a typological analysis of the 14 firms in the sample based on evidence presented so far. Hypothesis 1 (see section 2.1.) is supported with restrictions. It is supported with regard to pension reforms, but not supported with regard to active labour market policies. Possibly, positive incentives for the internalisation of older workers entailed by labour market reforms incite action to a lower extent than do sanctions (see Table 1 in chapter 2.). I however claim that structural conditions (above all, the situation on the labour market) determine firm-level policy and the degree of adaptation to institutional changes in the first place. Of the two competing hypotheses 2A and 2B (see section 2.2.), hypothesis 2A is supported with regard to recruitment, as older workers are seldom hired. Firms set a certain age threshold above which applicants are regarded as less able. Hypothesis 2A is also supported with regard to the termination of the work contract – older workers are treated as 156

conditions, with concomitant receipt of a favourable wage compensation. The works<br />

councils are therefore proponents of developing a replacement model for ATZ.<br />

Employee representatives in the studied firms always strive for avoiding dismissals due<br />

to operational reasons. In some firms or sectors, Agreements on Protection against<br />

Rationalisation are being concluded for such purposes (e.g. in the banking sector, in the<br />

public sector, in Firm DE-5, in Firm DE-13 at times, in Firm DE-10, planned by the works<br />

council in Firm DE-9), and social plans define the priority of „socially acceptable“<br />

measures of personnel reductions over dismissals. Works councils have co-determination<br />

powers in case of dismissals, and their intervention on behalf of workers selected for<br />

dismissal is usually successful.<br />

The prevention of dismissals due to operational reasons was in most cases only possible<br />

due to the use of other alternatives. Here, employee representatives played a role in<br />

focusing the personnel reductions on older workers. That is sign of a change in the position<br />

of works councils within German firms, and the risen importance of firm-level compared to<br />

branch-level bargaining (Weitbrecht 2003: 69-70). The works council plays here the role of<br />

a co-manager (Schmidt/Trinczek 1999: 117) by preventing dismissals and, at the same<br />

time, supporting the personnel management in using early retirement as a downsizing<br />

measure (e.g. in Firm DE-3).<br />

There were singular contradictory examples to that line of action, of WCM who<br />

favoured the termination of younger workers´ contracts instead of releasing older ones, or<br />

who opted for the extension for the protection against dismissals of older workers (Firm<br />

DE-4, Firm DE-13, Firm DE-14).<br />

In the light of those findings, the part of hypothesis 7 related to Germany (see section<br />

2.4.) is herewith supported. The institution of co-determination necessitates the<br />

management to consult matters related to the termination of the work contract with<br />

employee representatives. Moreover, due to the model of homogeneous trade union<br />

representation in one company, they do not have to compete for power and are more prone<br />

to compromise. In fact, recent history of labour relations shows a far-reaching collusion of<br />

interests between the two parties over early retirement (Ebbinghaus 2002: 48).<br />

This section has shown that the degree of cooperation or conflict between the works<br />

council and the management differs with regard to HRM fields. While works councils have<br />

155

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!