Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University

Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University

jacobs.university.de
from jacobs.university.de More from this publisher
11.03.2014 Views

the lower ability of older workers to cope with changes, and to the objectively faster pace of changes than in the past due to globalisation, computerisation, privatisation or acquisitions. That corresponds with representative European findings on risen work intensity, and the negative assessment of chances to work until the standard retirement age by workers from high-intensity industries (European Foundation: 2008: 46-47). The interviewees also held the opinion that older workers decide to exit early because of dissatisfaction with management culture and the job climate and their perception that old age was not valued by the young management board. Data from representative surveys confirms the positive link between job satisfaction and health satisfaction on the one side, and retirement age on the other side (Henke 2000: 208). It can be seen that all factors depicted in Figure 2 (see chapter 2.) – pull, push and jump motives for early exit – play a role for the decision of workers in the studied firms to retire. This corresponds with Oswald´s (1999: 23) findings based on household panel data. Despite the general orientation of older workers towards early exit, this wish cannot be always realised. The biggest inhibitor to early exit was a low expected pension income. Low pension income can thus be seen as opportunity to prolonged employment, but not to active ageing as an unfavourable economic situations inhibits autonomous decisions about one´s life course. The calculations of older workers pointed to behaviour in accordance with the hypothesis of securing the standard of living rather than with the life cycle theory (Dinkel 1988: 135; see also section 2.3.). An example of this phenomenon is the situation in a knowledge-intensive company. The decision to retire or to continue work is based on a sober calculation of the income and pension losses on the one hand, and the gains in leisure, family responsibilities and commuting costs, on the other hand: “Workers without family responsibilities and with a higher income accept even the 18 per cent deductions. The lower incomes who maybe have additional responsibilities, like dependant children (…), they want to have the lowest possible deductions, maximally up to 5-10 per cent” (1_Firm DE- 12_HRM). Other motives for working longer identified by interviewees in German firms were social contacts at work, a high managerial position, job satisfaction, high value of work, a still working spouse. Those motives were observed especially with regard to male workers. Also institutional changes, and the related options to secure the standard of living in old age, exert an impact on the retirement decision. Experts in several firms mentioned cases 141

where workers cancelled the previously agreed ATZ contract after the firm had calculated their future pension level. The legal expert at the utility company contacted in 2006 estimated that about eleven per cent of persons in the early retirement scheme might have problems with lower pensions due to low income or short tenure and the related low claims to occupational pensions. Workers in many other firms decided against participating in the early retirement scheme after initial consultations with the works council or the legal expert in the firm. An example of the impact of pension reforms is the food manufacturing Firm DE-6. The chairman of the works council describes the early exit orientation of workers as follows: “They all want of course to leave the firm at the age of 50, at 60, the latest. But we [sic!] have also realised that it is not possible [because of the low wages]” (2_Firm DE- 6_WCM). Workers who are worn-out would like to exit early but only a few utilise ATZ as the firm cannot afford to pay a high ATZ income and as wages are very low. At the time of the second interview, older workers had a still lower propensity to participate in the early retirement scheme or the 59 rule due to the even lower anticipated pension level as a result of the meanwhile risen retirement ages and lower replacement rates. A survey of workers aged 45 and more in Firm DE-7 and Firm DE-8 revealed that 2/3 of the younger age group (45-55) favours an exit at the age of 55-60 years and 1/3 at the age of 60-65. Among the 56-65-year-olds, the shares were the other way round. This is a sign of a more realistic assessment of available retirement options and related consequences for the pension level. That corresponds with results of representative surveys which show an upwards adaptation of the planned age of exit from the labour market (Engstler 2004). The impact of pension reforms on reversing the trend towards early retirement manifests itself in the leisure/work calculations presented above. Another adaptation pattern of workers to changes rules is continued participation in the early retirement scheme, but with changed parameters. E.g., in the food manufacturing Firm DE-9, younger birth cohorts choose an increasingly longer duration of ATZ (5 years instead of 2-3 years), and thus their retirement age after ATZ is increasing by and by (at 62-63 and not at 60-61) (information from additional material). This was followed by a change of attitude towards early exit – while during the first interview, the chairman of the works council in Firm DE-9 pondered on the age of 60 or 60.5 as a “magic line”, a demarcation line for the phase of early exit, during the second interview a few years later, he talked about the age of 63 as the “absolutely magic number”. 142

where workers cancelled the previously agreed ATZ contract after the firm had calculated<br />

their future pension level. The legal expert at the utility company contacted in 2006<br />

estimated that about eleven per cent of persons in the early retirement scheme might have<br />

problems with lower pensions due to low income or short tenure and the related low claims<br />

to occupational pensions. Workers in many other firms decided against participating in the<br />

early retirement scheme after initial consultations with the works council or the legal expert<br />

in the firm.<br />

An example of the impact of pension reforms is the food manufacturing Firm DE-6.<br />

The chairman of the works council describes the early exit orientation of workers as<br />

follows: “They all want of course to leave the firm at the age of 50, at 60, the latest. But we<br />

[sic!] have also realised that it is not possible [because of the low wages]” (2_Firm DE-<br />

6_WCM). Workers who are worn-out would like to exit early but only a few utilise ATZ as<br />

the firm cannot afford to pay a high ATZ income and as wages are very low. At the time of<br />

the second interview, older workers had a still lower propensity to participate in the early<br />

retirement scheme or the 59 rule due to the even lower anticipated pension level as a result<br />

of the meanwhile risen retirement ages and lower replacement rates.<br />

A survey of workers aged 45 and more in Firm DE-7 and Firm DE-8 revealed that 2/3<br />

of the younger age group (45-55) favours an exit at the age of 55-60 years and 1/3 at the<br />

age of 60-65. Among the 56-65-year-olds, the shares were the other way round. This is a<br />

sign of a more realistic assessment of available retirement options and related consequences<br />

for the pension level. That corresponds with results of representative surveys which show<br />

an upwards adaptation of the planned age of exit from the labour market (Engstler 2004).<br />

The impact of pension reforms on reversing the trend towards early retirement<br />

manifests itself in the leisure/work calculations presented above. Another adaptation pattern<br />

of workers to changes rules is continued participation in the early retirement scheme, but<br />

with changed parameters. E.g., in the food manufacturing Firm DE-9, younger birth cohorts<br />

choose an increasingly longer duration of ATZ (5 years instead of 2-3 years), and thus their<br />

retirement age after ATZ is increasing by and by (at 62-63 and not at 60-61) (information<br />

from additional material). This was followed by a change of attitude towards early exit –<br />

while during the first interview, the chairman of the works council in Firm DE-9 pondered<br />

on the age of 60 or 60.5 as a “magic line”, a demarcation line for the phase of early exit,<br />

during the second interview a few years later, he talked about the age of 63 as the<br />

“absolutely magic number”.<br />

142

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!