Development of a Novel Mass Spectrometric ... - Jacobs University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Results and Discussion KMD 1.1 1 I2 0.9 I3 0.8 0.7 0.6 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 NKM Figure 3-77 Kendrick plot overlap of untreated I2 and I3 waste samples 1.05 KMD 1 I3 0.95 R1.3 0.9 R2.3 0.85 R3.3 0.8 0.75 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 NKM Figure 3-78 Kendrick plot overlap of I3 and treated sample on small scale 103
Results and Discussion Other interesting comparison involved overlapping the Kendrick plots of waste sample, which was preserved from 2009, with another freshly treated one from 2011. However to attain a confident figure of this comparison, some few parameters of data analysis were considered according to table 3.9. After establishing their Kendrick plot, the display quickly discriminates between the two waste samples. Degradation seems more evincive with 2009 sample according to figure 3-79. This is attributed to persistent compositional evolution as time elapses. Hydrocarbons within sample 2009 are expected to be comprising higher unsaturation degrees than those in 2011 sample. This is parallel to reduced values of KMD of the hydrocarbons in sample 2009 compared to those of 2011 sample. Table 3.9 Acquisition of data points considered in 2009 and 2011 samples # Sample taken Total Signals S/N Filter Signals Waste (2009) 3/11/2009 1065 50 820 Waste (2011) 4/2/2011 1200 30 800 1.1 KMD 1 W (2009) 0.9 0.8 W (2011) 0.7 0.6 0.5 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 NKM Figure 3-79 Kendrick plot overlap between 2009 and 2011 waste samples 104
Page 1 and 2:
Development of a Novel Mass Spectro
Page 3 and 4:
Declaration of Authorship I ,Nadim
Page 5 and 6:
This work has been carried out unde
Page 7 and 8:
Contents Contents Declaration of Au
Page 9 and 10:
List of Figures List of Figures Fig
Page 11 and 12:
List of Figures Figure 3-39 MS 2 fr
Page 13 and 14:
List of Tables List of Tables Table
Page 15 and 16:
Abbreviations Abbreviations APCI AP
Page 17 and 18:
Abbreviations UV VGOs VOCs VRs ultr
Page 19 and 20:
Introduction Analytical chemistry h
Page 21 and 22:
Introduction 1.2 Presence and Fate
Page 23 and 24:
Introduction aliphatic hydrocarbons
Page 25 and 26:
Introduction Figure 1-1 Examples of
Page 27 and 28:
Introduction Figure 1-2 Range of io
Page 29 and 30:
Introduction fractions. 42 Another
Page 31 and 32:
Introduction 1.3.5 APLI Other crude
Page 33 and 34:
Introduction products). Other molec
Page 35 and 36:
Introduction Other studies performe
Page 37 and 38:
Introduction APLI-FT ICR-MS Crude o
Page 39 and 40:
Introduction spectrometry in as muc
Page 41 and 42:
Introduction catalytic processing t
Page 43 and 44:
Introduction Figure 1-6 Kendrick ma
Page 45 and 46:
Introduction including determinatio
Page 47 and 48:
Introduction 1.5 Scope and Signific
Page 49 and 50:
Experimental e) Other model mixture
Page 51 and 52:
Experimental 2.2.2 Preparation of O
Page 53 and 54:
Experimental 2.4 Graphical Presenta
Page 55 and 56:
Results and Discussion experiment.
Page 57 and 58:
Results and Discussion Intens. [%]
Page 59 and 60:
Results and Discussion common featu
Page 61 and 62:
Results and Discussion 3.2 APCI-TOF
Page 63 and 64:
Results and Discussion These compou
Page 65 and 66:
Results and Discussion Intens. [%]
Page 67 and 68:
Results and Discussion Ions were pr
Page 69 and 70: Results and Discussion Intens. [%]
Page 71 and 72: Results and Discussion procedure ba
Page 75 and 76: Results and Discussion to produce m
Page 77 and 78: Results and Discussion 519.5863 519
Page 79 and 80: Results and Discussion Higher mass
Page 87 and 88: Results and Discussion isolated fro
Page 93 and 94: Results and Discussion 3.4.5 Tandem
Page 97 and 98: Results and Discussion injected int
Page 101 and 102: Results and Discussion 3.4.8 Quanti
Page 103 and 104: Results and Discussion Int. x 10000
Page 105 and 106: Results and Discussion Table 3.6 Qu
Page 107 and 108: Results and Discussion assessment o
Page 109 and 110: Results and Discussion hydrocarbons
Page 117 and 118: Results and Discussion of n-alkanes
Page 119: Results and Discussion flow (in I2)
Page 123 and 124: Results and Discussion Figure 3-80
Page 125 and 126: Results and Discussion KMD 2.4 2.2
Page 127 and 128: Results and Discussion KMD 1.1 1 Le
Page 129 and 130: Results and Discussion 3.6.4 Asphal
Page 131 and 132: Conclusions In conclusion we could
Page 133 and 134: References References 1. Fay, R. M.
Page 135 and 136: References 23. Colavecchia, M. V.,
Page 137 and 138: References 47. Dzidic, I., Petersen
Page 139 and 140: References Hydroconversion Processe
Page 141 and 142: References 91. Golovlev, V. V., All
Page 143 and 144: Appendix Light shredder waste Meas.
Page 145 and 146: 419.4592 C 30 H 59 419.4611 4.6 421
Page 147 and 148: Liqui Moly car motor oil Meas. m/z
Page 149 and 150: 345.3511 C 25 H 45 345.3516 1.5 349
show all

Development of a Novel Mass Spectrometric ... - Jacobs University

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?