Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University
Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University
66 Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spin Relaxation in Confined Systems correction than the bulk modes do, since they relax more slowly. This also results in a shift in the minimum of the conductivity towards smaller magnetic fields in comparison to the 0-mode approximation. The reduction of spin relaxation has recently been observed in optical measurements of n-doped InGaAs quantum wires[HSM + 06] and in transport measurements.[DLS + 05, LSK + 07, SGP + 06, WGZ + 06, Mei05] Recently in Ref.[KKN09], the enhancement of spin lifetime due to dimensional confinement in gated InGaAs wires with gate controlled SO coupling was reported. Reference [HSM + 06] reports saturation of spinrelaxation innarrowwires, W ≪ L SO , attributed tocubicDresselhaus coupling.[Ket07] The contribution of the linear and cubic Dresselhaus SO interaction to the spin relaxation turns out to depend strongly on growth direction and will be studied in more detail in Chapter4. Including both the linear Rashba and Dresselhaus SO coupling we have shown that there exist two long persisting spin helix solutions in narrow wires even for arbitrary strength of both SO coupling effects. This is in contrast to the 2D case, where the condition α 1 = α 2 , respectively in the case where the cubic Dresselhaus term cannot be neglected, α 1 −m e γ g E F /2 = α 2 , is required to find persistent spin helices [BOZ06, LCCC06] as it was measured recently (Ref. [KWO + 09]). Regarding the type of boundary, we found that the injection of polarized spins into nonmagnetic material is favorable for wires with a smooth confinement, λ F ∂ y V < ∆ α = 2k F α 2 . With such adiabatic boundary conditions, states which are polarized in z direction relax with a finite rate for wires with widths Q SO W ≪ 1, while the spin relaxation rate of all other states diverges in that limit. In tubular wires with periodic boundary conditions, the spin relaxation is found to remain constant as the wire circumference is reduced. Finally, by including the Zeeman coupling to the perpendicular magnetic field, we have shown that for spin-conserving boundary condition the critical wire width, W c , where the crossover from negative to positive magnetoconductivity occurs, depends not only on the dephasing rate but also depends on the g factor of the material.
Chapter 4 Direction Dependence of Spin Relaxation and Diffusive-Ballistic Crossover 4.1 Introduction In Chapter3 it was shown how the spin relaxes in a quasi 1D electron system in a quantum well grown in the [001] direction, depending on the width of the wire, where the normal of the boundary was pointing in the [010] direction. In a system with only Rashba SOC or linear Dresselhaus SOC in a (111) quantum well it is clear from the vector fields plotted in Fig.2.2 that a rotation in the plain should not effect the physics, i.e. the minimal spin relaxation rate will not reduce. The linear Rashba SOC does not depend on the growth direction at all. It is already known that on the other hand in a (001) 2D system with both BIA[Dre55] and SIA[BR84] we get an anisotropic spinrelaxation.[KRW03, CWd07, WJW10] This has also been studied numerically in quasi-1D GaAs wires[LLK + 10]. In this Chapter, Sec.4.2, we present analytical results concerning this anisotropy for the 2D case as well as the case of quantum wire with spin and charge conserving boundaries. As in the previous chapter, also here we focus on materials where the dominant mechanism for spin relaxation is governed by the DP spin relaxation. Furthermore we extend our analysis to other growth directions, Sec.4.3: Searching for long spin decoherence times at room temperature, the (110) quantum wire attracted attention. 67
- Page 25 and 26: Chapter 2: Spin Dynamics: Overview
- Page 27 and 28: Chapter 2: Spin Dynamics: Overview
- Page 29 and 30: Chapter 2: Spin Dynamics: Overview
- Page 31 and 32: Chapter 2: Spin Dynamics: Overview
- Page 33 and 34: Chapter 2: Spin Dynamics: Overview
- Page 35 and 36: Chapter 3 WL/WAL Crossover and Spin
- Page 37 and 38: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 39 and 40: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 41 and 42: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 43 and 44: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 45 and 46: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 47 and 48: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 49 and 50: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 51 and 52: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 53 and 54: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 55 and 56: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 57 and 58: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 59 and 60: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 61 and 62: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 63 and 64: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 65 and 66: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 67 and 68: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 69 and 70: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 71 and 72: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 73 and 74: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 75: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 79 and 80: Chapter 4: Direction Dependence of
- Page 81 and 82: Chapter 4: Direction Dependence of
- Page 83 and 84: Chapter 4: Direction Dependence of
- Page 85 and 86: Chapter 4: Direction Dependence of
- Page 87 and 88: Chapter 4: Direction Dependence of
- Page 89 and 90: Chapter 4: Direction Dependence of
- Page 91 and 92: Chapter 4: Direction Dependence of
- Page 93 and 94: Chapter 5 Spin Hall Effect 5.1 Intr
- Page 95 and 96: Chapter 5: Spin Hall Effect 85 curr
- Page 97 and 98: Chapter 5: Spin Hall Effect 87 with
- Page 99 and 100: Chapter 5: Spin Hall Effect 89 1.0
- Page 101 and 102: Chapter 5: Spin Hall Effect 91 as s
- Page 103 and 104: Chapter 5: Spin Hall Effect 93 V⩵
- Page 105 and 106: Chapter 5: Spin Hall Effect 95 0.4
- Page 107 and 108: Chapter 5: Spin Hall Effect 97 oper
- Page 109 and 110: Chapter 5: Spin Hall Effect 99 the
- Page 111 and 112: Chapter 5: Spin Hall Effect 101 str
- Page 113 and 114: Chapter 5: Spin Hall Effect 103 Com
- Page 115 and 116: Chapter 5: Spin Hall Effect 105 Fin
- Page 117 and 118: Chapter 6: Critical Discussion and
- Page 119 and 120: Chapter 6: Critical Discussion and
- Page 121 and 122: List of Figures 111 3.3 Exemplifica
- Page 123 and 124: List of Figures 113 4.2 The spin de
- Page 125 and 126: List of Tables 3.1 Singlet and trip
Chapter 4<br />
Direction Dependence <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sp<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
Relaxation and Diffusive-Ballistic<br />
Crossover<br />
4.1 Introduction<br />
In Chapter3 it was shown how the sp<strong>in</strong> relaxes <strong>in</strong> a quasi 1D electron system <strong>in</strong><br />
a quantum well grown <strong>in</strong> the [001] direction, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the width <strong>of</strong> the wire, where<br />
the normal <strong>of</strong> the boundary was po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the [010] direction. In a system with only<br />
Rashba SOC or l<strong>in</strong>ear Dresselhaus SOC <strong>in</strong> a (111) quantum well it is clear from the vector<br />
fields plotted <strong>in</strong> Fig.2.2 that a rotation <strong>in</strong> the pla<strong>in</strong> should not effect the physics,<br />
i.e. the m<strong>in</strong>imal sp<strong>in</strong> relaxation rate will not reduce. The l<strong>in</strong>ear Rashba SOC does<br />
not depend on the growth direction at all. It is already known that on the other hand<br />
<strong>in</strong> a (001) 2D system with both BIA[Dre55] and SIA[BR84] we get an anisotropic sp<strong>in</strong>relaxation.[KRW03,<br />
CWd07, WJW10] This has also been studied numerically <strong>in</strong> quasi-1D<br />
GaAs wires[LLK + 10]. In this Chapter, Sec.4.2, we present analytical results concern<strong>in</strong>g<br />
this anisotropy for the 2D case as well as the case <strong>of</strong> quantum wire with sp<strong>in</strong> and charge<br />
conserv<strong>in</strong>g boundaries. As <strong>in</strong> the previous chapter, also here we focus on materials where<br />
the dom<strong>in</strong>ant mechanism for sp<strong>in</strong> relaxation is governed by the DP sp<strong>in</strong> relaxation.<br />
Furthermore we extend our analysis to other growth directions, Sec.4.3: Search<strong>in</strong>g for long<br />
sp<strong>in</strong> decoherence times at room temperature, the (110) quantum wire attracted attention.<br />
67