11.03.2014 Views

Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University

Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University

Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and <strong>Sp<strong>in</strong></strong> Relaxation <strong>in</strong> Conf<strong>in</strong>ed Systems 65<br />

1.2<br />

Q SO Wc<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4<br />

g/8m e D e<br />

(a)<br />

3.5<br />

3.0<br />

Q SO Wc<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2<br />

B Z /H s<br />

(b)<br />

Figure 3.19: (a) Change <strong>of</strong> crossover width W c with g factor: The magnetic field is <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />

as an effective field 1/τ B and <strong>in</strong> the Zeeman term. The strength <strong>of</strong> the contribution <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Zeeman term is varied by the material dependent factor ˜g = gµ B H s /D e Q 2 SO. (b) Change<br />

<strong>of</strong> crossover width W c with Zeeman field: To calculate W c , we fix the Zeeman field to a<br />

certa<strong>in</strong> value, horizontal axis, while we vary the effective field <strong>in</strong>dependently and calculate<br />

if negative or positive magnetoconductivity is present. For different Zeeman fields B Z /H s ,<br />

we f<strong>in</strong>d thereby a different width W c . Here, we set g/8m e D e = 1. In (a) and (b), the cut<strong>of</strong>f<br />

due to dephas<strong>in</strong>g is varied: 1/D e Q 2 SOτ ϕ = 0.04,0.06,0.08 (lowest first).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!