Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University
Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University
Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and <strong>Sp<strong>in</strong></strong> Relaxation <strong>in</strong> Conf<strong>in</strong>ed Systems 65<br />
1.2<br />
Q SO Wc<br />
1.0<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4<br />
g/8m e D e<br />
(a)<br />
3.5<br />
3.0<br />
Q SO Wc<br />
2.5<br />
2.0<br />
1.5<br />
1.0<br />
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2<br />
B Z /H s<br />
(b)<br />
Figure 3.19: (a) Change <strong>of</strong> crossover width W c with g factor: The magnetic field is <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />
as an effective field 1/τ B and <strong>in</strong> the Zeeman term. The strength <strong>of</strong> the contribution <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Zeeman term is varied by the material dependent factor ˜g = gµ B H s /D e Q 2 SO. (b) Change<br />
<strong>of</strong> crossover width W c with Zeeman field: To calculate W c , we fix the Zeeman field to a<br />
certa<strong>in</strong> value, horizontal axis, while we vary the effective field <strong>in</strong>dependently and calculate<br />
if negative or positive magnetoconductivity is present. For different Zeeman fields B Z /H s ,<br />
we f<strong>in</strong>d thereby a different width W c . Here, we set g/8m e D e = 1. In (a) and (b), the cut<strong>of</strong>f<br />
due to dephas<strong>in</strong>g is varied: 1/D e Q 2 SOτ ϕ = 0.04,0.06,0.08 (lowest first).