Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University
Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University
56 Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spin Relaxation in Confined Systems Tubular Wires In tubular wires, such as carbon nanotubes, and InN nanowires in which only surface electrons conduct,[PHC + 09] and radial core-shell InO nanowires,[JLS + 08] the tubular topology of the electron system can be taken into account by periodic boundary conditions. Inthefollowing, wefocusonwireswherethedominant SOcouplingisofRashbatype. Ifone requires furthermore that this SO-coupling strength is uniform and the wire curvature can be neglected,[PHC + 09] the spectrum of the Cooperon propagator can be obtained by substituting in Eq.(3.52) the transverse momentum Q y by the quantized values Q y = n2π/W, n is an integer, when W is the circumference of the tubular wire. Thus, the spin relaxation rate remains unchanged, 1/τ s = (7/16)D e Q 2 SO. If then a magnetic field perpendicular to the cylinder axis is applied as done in Ref. [PHC + 09], there remains a negative magnetoconductivity due to the WAL, which is enhanced due to the dimensional crossover from the 2D correction to the conductivity Eq.(C.39) to the quasi-one-dimensional behavior of the quantum correction to the conductivity [Eq.(3.79)]. In tubular wires in which the circumference fulfills the quasi-one-dimensional condition W < L ϕ , the WL correction can then be written as ∆σ = √ √ HW √ Hϕ +B ∗ (W)/4 − HW √ Hϕ +B ∗ (W)/4+H s (W) √ HW −2√ Hϕ +B ∗ (W)/4+7H s (W)/16 (3.92) in units of e 2 /2π. As in Eq.(3.79), we defined H W = 1/4eW 2 , but the effective external magnetic field differs due to the different geometry: Assuming that W < l B , we have[Ket07] 1 = D e (2e) 2 B 2 〈y 2 〉 (3.93) τ B = D e (2e) 21 ( ) BW 2 (3.94) 2 2π and the effective external magnetic field yields ( ) BW 2 B ∗ (W) = (2e) (3.95) 2π = (2e)(Br tube ) 2 , (3.96)
Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spin Relaxation in Confined Systems 57 with the tube radius r tube . The spin relaxation field H s is H s = 1/4eD e τ s , with 1/τ s = 2p 2 F α2 2 τ, or in terms of the effective Zeeman field B SO, H s = gγ g 16 B SO (ǫ F ) 2 ǫ F . (3.97) Thus the geometrical aspect, 〈y 2 〉 tube /〈y 2 〉 planar ≈ 6.6, might resolve the difference between measured and calculated SO coupling strength in Ref. [PHC + 09] where a planar geometry has been assumed to fit the data. This assumption leads in a tubular geometry to an underestimation of H s (W). The flux cancellation effect is as long as we are in the diffusive regime, l e ≪ W, negligible. 3.5 Magnetoconductivity with Zeeman splitting In the following, we want to study if the Zeeman term, Eq.(3.42), is modifying the magnetoconductivity. Accordingly, we assume that the magnetic field is perpendicular to the 2DES. Taking into account the Zeeman term to first order in the external magnetic field B = (0,0,B) T , the Cooperon is according to Eq.(3.43) given by Ĉ(Q) = 1 D e (Q+2eA+2eA S ) 2 +i 1 2 γ g(σ ′ −σ)B . (3.98) This is valid for magnetic fields γ g B ≪ 1/τ. Due to the term proportional to (σ ′ −σ), the singletsectoroftheCooperonmixeswiththetripletone. Wecanfindtheeigenstates ofC −1 , |i〉 with the eigenvalues 1/λ i . Thus, the sum over all spin up and down combinations αβ,βα in Eq.(3.35) for the conductance correction simplifies in the singlet-triplet representation to (AppendixC.1) ∑ C αββα = ∑ i αβ (−〈⇄ |i〉〈i|⇄〉+〈⇈ |i〉〈i|⇈〉 +〈⇉ |i〉〈i|⇉〉+〈 |i〉〈i|〉)λ i . (3.99) 3.5.1 2DEG The coupling of the singlet to the triplet sector lifts the energy level crossings at K = ±1/ √ 2 of the singlet E S and the triplet branch E T− as can be seen in Fig.3.15 for a nonvanishing Zeeman coupling. The spectrum, which is not positive definite anymore for
- Page 15 and 16: Chapter 1: Introduction 5 Throughou
- Page 17 and 18: Chapter 2: Spin Dynamics: Overview
- Page 19 and 20: Chapter 2: Spin Dynamics: Overview
- Page 21 and 22: Chapter 2: Spin Dynamics: Overview
- Page 23 and 24: Chapter 2: Spin Dynamics: Overview
- Page 25 and 26: Chapter 2: Spin Dynamics: Overview
- Page 27 and 28: Chapter 2: Spin Dynamics: Overview
- Page 29 and 30: Chapter 2: Spin Dynamics: Overview
- Page 31 and 32: Chapter 2: Spin Dynamics: Overview
- Page 33 and 34: Chapter 2: Spin Dynamics: Overview
- Page 35 and 36: Chapter 3 WL/WAL Crossover and Spin
- Page 37 and 38: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 39 and 40: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 41 and 42: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 43 and 44: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 45 and 46: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 47 and 48: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 49 and 50: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 51 and 52: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 53 and 54: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 55 and 56: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 57 and 58: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 59 and 60: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 61 and 62: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 63 and 64: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 65: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 69 and 70: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 71 and 72: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 73 and 74: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 75 and 76: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 77 and 78: Chapter 4 Direction Dependence of S
- Page 79 and 80: Chapter 4: Direction Dependence of
- Page 81 and 82: Chapter 4: Direction Dependence of
- Page 83 and 84: Chapter 4: Direction Dependence of
- Page 85 and 86: Chapter 4: Direction Dependence of
- Page 87 and 88: Chapter 4: Direction Dependence of
- Page 89 and 90: Chapter 4: Direction Dependence of
- Page 91 and 92: Chapter 4: Direction Dependence of
- Page 93 and 94: Chapter 5 Spin Hall Effect 5.1 Intr
- Page 95 and 96: Chapter 5: Spin Hall Effect 85 curr
- Page 97 and 98: Chapter 5: Spin Hall Effect 87 with
- Page 99 and 100: Chapter 5: Spin Hall Effect 89 1.0
- Page 101 and 102: Chapter 5: Spin Hall Effect 91 as s
- Page 103 and 104: Chapter 5: Spin Hall Effect 93 V⩵
- Page 105 and 106: Chapter 5: Spin Hall Effect 95 0.4
- Page 107 and 108: Chapter 5: Spin Hall Effect 97 oper
- Page 109 and 110: Chapter 5: Spin Hall Effect 99 the
- Page 111 and 112: Chapter 5: Spin Hall Effect 101 str
- Page 113 and 114: Chapter 5: Spin Hall Effect 103 Com
- Page 115 and 116: Chapter 5: Spin Hall Effect 105 Fin
Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and <strong>Sp<strong>in</strong></strong> Relaxation <strong>in</strong> Conf<strong>in</strong>ed Systems 57<br />
with the tube radius r tube . The sp<strong>in</strong> relaxation field H s is H s = 1/4eD e τ s , with 1/τ s =<br />
2p 2 F α2 2 τ, or <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> the effective Zeeman field B SO,<br />
H s = gγ g<br />
16<br />
B SO (ǫ F ) 2<br />
ǫ F<br />
. (3.97)<br />
Thus the geometrical aspect, 〈y 2 〉 tube /〈y 2 〉 planar ≈ 6.6, might resolve the difference between<br />
measured and calculated SO coupl<strong>in</strong>g strength <strong>in</strong> Ref. [PHC + 09] where a planar geometry<br />
has been assumed to fit the data. This assumption leads <strong>in</strong> a tubular geometry to an<br />
underestimation <strong>of</strong> H s (W). The flux cancellation effect is as long as we are <strong>in</strong> the diffusive<br />
regime, l e ≪ W, negligible.<br />
3.5 Magnetoconductivity with Zeeman splitt<strong>in</strong>g<br />
In the follow<strong>in</strong>g, we want to study if the Zeeman term, Eq.(3.42), is modify<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the magnetoconductivity. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, we assume that the magnetic field is perpendicular<br />
to the 2DES. Tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account the Zeeman term to first order <strong>in</strong> the external magnetic<br />
field B = (0,0,B) T , the Cooperon is accord<strong>in</strong>g to Eq.(3.43) given by<br />
Ĉ(Q) =<br />
1<br />
D e (Q+2eA+2eA S ) 2 +i 1 2 γ g(σ ′ −σ)B . (3.98)<br />
This is valid for magnetic fields γ g B ≪ 1/τ. Due to the term proportional to (σ ′ −σ), the<br />
s<strong>in</strong>gletsector<strong>of</strong>theCooperonmixeswiththetripletone. Wecanf<strong>in</strong>dtheeigenstates <strong>of</strong>C −1 ,<br />
|i〉 with the eigenvalues 1/λ i . Thus, the sum over all sp<strong>in</strong> up and down comb<strong>in</strong>ations αβ,βα<br />
<strong>in</strong> Eq.(3.35) for the conductance correction simplifies <strong>in</strong> the s<strong>in</strong>glet-triplet representation<br />
to (AppendixC.1)<br />
∑<br />
C αββα = ∑ i<br />
αβ<br />
(−〈⇄ |i〉〈i|⇄〉+〈⇈ |i〉〈i|⇈〉<br />
+〈⇉ |i〉〈i|⇉〉+〈 |i〉〈i|〉)λ i . (3.99)<br />
3.5.1 2DEG<br />
The coupl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the s<strong>in</strong>glet to the triplet sector lifts the energy level cross<strong>in</strong>gs at<br />
K = ±1/ √ 2 <strong>of</strong> the s<strong>in</strong>glet E S and the triplet branch E T− as can be seen <strong>in</strong> Fig.3.15 for a<br />
nonvanish<strong>in</strong>g Zeeman coupl<strong>in</strong>g. The spectrum, which is not positive def<strong>in</strong>ite anymore for