Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University

Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University

jacobs.university.de
from jacobs.university.de More from this publisher
11.03.2014 Views

56 Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spin Relaxation in Confined Systems Tubular Wires In tubular wires, such as carbon nanotubes, and InN nanowires in which only surface electrons conduct,[PHC + 09] and radial core-shell InO nanowires,[JLS + 08] the tubular topology of the electron system can be taken into account by periodic boundary conditions. Inthefollowing, wefocusonwireswherethedominant SOcouplingisofRashbatype. Ifone requires furthermore that this SO-coupling strength is uniform and the wire curvature can be neglected,[PHC + 09] the spectrum of the Cooperon propagator can be obtained by substituting in Eq.(3.52) the transverse momentum Q y by the quantized values Q y = n2π/W, n is an integer, when W is the circumference of the tubular wire. Thus, the spin relaxation rate remains unchanged, 1/τ s = (7/16)D e Q 2 SO. If then a magnetic field perpendicular to the cylinder axis is applied as done in Ref. [PHC + 09], there remains a negative magnetoconductivity due to the WAL, which is enhanced due to the dimensional crossover from the 2D correction to the conductivity Eq.(C.39) to the quasi-one-dimensional behavior of the quantum correction to the conductivity [Eq.(3.79)]. In tubular wires in which the circumference fulfills the quasi-one-dimensional condition W < L ϕ , the WL correction can then be written as ∆σ = √ √ HW √ Hϕ +B ∗ (W)/4 − HW √ Hϕ +B ∗ (W)/4+H s (W) √ HW −2√ Hϕ +B ∗ (W)/4+7H s (W)/16 (3.92) in units of e 2 /2π. As in Eq.(3.79), we defined H W = 1/4eW 2 , but the effective external magnetic field differs due to the different geometry: Assuming that W < l B , we have[Ket07] 1 = D e (2e) 2 B 2 〈y 2 〉 (3.93) τ B = D e (2e) 21 ( ) BW 2 (3.94) 2 2π and the effective external magnetic field yields ( ) BW 2 B ∗ (W) = (2e) (3.95) 2π = (2e)(Br tube ) 2 , (3.96)

Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spin Relaxation in Confined Systems 57 with the tube radius r tube . The spin relaxation field H s is H s = 1/4eD e τ s , with 1/τ s = 2p 2 F α2 2 τ, or in terms of the effective Zeeman field B SO, H s = gγ g 16 B SO (ǫ F ) 2 ǫ F . (3.97) Thus the geometrical aspect, 〈y 2 〉 tube /〈y 2 〉 planar ≈ 6.6, might resolve the difference between measured and calculated SO coupling strength in Ref. [PHC + 09] where a planar geometry has been assumed to fit the data. This assumption leads in a tubular geometry to an underestimation of H s (W). The flux cancellation effect is as long as we are in the diffusive regime, l e ≪ W, negligible. 3.5 Magnetoconductivity with Zeeman splitting In the following, we want to study if the Zeeman term, Eq.(3.42), is modifying the magnetoconductivity. Accordingly, we assume that the magnetic field is perpendicular to the 2DES. Taking into account the Zeeman term to first order in the external magnetic field B = (0,0,B) T , the Cooperon is according to Eq.(3.43) given by Ĉ(Q) = 1 D e (Q+2eA+2eA S ) 2 +i 1 2 γ g(σ ′ −σ)B . (3.98) This is valid for magnetic fields γ g B ≪ 1/τ. Due to the term proportional to (σ ′ −σ), the singletsectoroftheCooperonmixeswiththetripletone. Wecanfindtheeigenstates ofC −1 , |i〉 with the eigenvalues 1/λ i . Thus, the sum over all spin up and down combinations αβ,βα in Eq.(3.35) for the conductance correction simplifies in the singlet-triplet representation to (AppendixC.1) ∑ C αββα = ∑ i αβ (−〈⇄ |i〉〈i|⇄〉+〈⇈ |i〉〈i|⇈〉 +〈⇉ |i〉〈i|⇉〉+〈 |i〉〈i|〉)λ i . (3.99) 3.5.1 2DEG The coupling of the singlet to the triplet sector lifts the energy level crossings at K = ±1/ √ 2 of the singlet E S and the triplet branch E T− as can be seen in Fig.3.15 for a nonvanishing Zeeman coupling. The spectrum, which is not positive definite anymore for

56 Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and <strong>Sp<strong>in</strong></strong> Relaxation <strong>in</strong> Conf<strong>in</strong>ed Systems<br />

Tubular Wires<br />

In tubular wires, such as carbon nanotubes, and InN nanowires <strong>in</strong> which only surface<br />

electrons conduct,[PHC + 09] and radial core-shell InO nanowires,[JLS + 08] the tubular<br />

topology <strong>of</strong> the electron system can be taken <strong>in</strong>to account by periodic boundary conditions.<br />

Inthefollow<strong>in</strong>g, wefocusonwireswherethedom<strong>in</strong>ant SOcoupl<strong>in</strong>gis<strong>of</strong>Rashbatype. Ifone<br />

requires furthermore that this SO-coupl<strong>in</strong>g strength is uniform and the wire curvature can<br />

be neglected,[PHC + 09] the spectrum <strong>of</strong> the Cooperon propagator can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed by substitut<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> Eq.(3.52) the transverse momentum Q y by the quantized values Q y = n2π/W,<br />

n is an <strong>in</strong>teger, when W is the circumference <strong>of</strong> the tubular wire. Thus, the sp<strong>in</strong> relaxation<br />

rate rema<strong>in</strong>s unchanged, 1/τ s = (7/16)D e Q 2 SO. If then a magnetic field perpendicular to<br />

the cyl<strong>in</strong>der axis is applied as done <strong>in</strong> Ref. [PHC + 09], there rema<strong>in</strong>s a negative magnetoconductivity<br />

due to the WAL, which is enhanced due to the dimensional crossover from the<br />

2D correction to the conductivity Eq.(C.39) to the quasi-one-dimensional behavior <strong>of</strong> the<br />

quantum correction to the conductivity [Eq.(3.79)]. In tubular wires <strong>in</strong> which the circumference<br />

fulfills the quasi-one-dimensional condition W < L ϕ , the WL correction can then<br />

be written as<br />

∆σ =<br />

√ √<br />

HW<br />

√<br />

Hϕ +B ∗ (W)/4 −<br />

HW<br />

√<br />

Hϕ +B ∗ (W)/4+H s (W)<br />

√<br />

HW<br />

−2√ Hϕ +B ∗ (W)/4+7H s (W)/16<br />

(3.92)<br />

<strong>in</strong> units <strong>of</strong> e 2 /2π. As <strong>in</strong> Eq.(3.79), we def<strong>in</strong>ed H W = 1/4eW 2 , but the effective external<br />

magnetic field differs due to the different geometry: Assum<strong>in</strong>g that W < l B , we have[Ket07]<br />

1<br />

= D e (2e) 2 B 2 〈y 2 〉 (3.93)<br />

τ B<br />

= D e (2e) 21 ( ) BW 2<br />

(3.94)<br />

2 2π<br />

and the effective external magnetic field yields<br />

( ) BW 2<br />

B ∗ (W) = (2e)<br />

(3.95)<br />

2π<br />

= (2e)(Br tube ) 2 , (3.96)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!