Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University

Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University

jacobs.university.de
from jacobs.university.de More from this publisher
11.03.2014 Views

30 Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spin Relaxation in Confined Systems (a) (b) Figure 3.3: Exemplification of the second term in Eq.(3.4): Interference of electrons traveling in the opposite direction along the same path causes an enhanced back-scattering, the WL effect. (a) Closed electron paths enclose a magnetic flux from an external magnetic field, indicated as the red arrow, breaking time reversal symmetry, breaking constructive interference. (b) The entanglement of spin and charge by SO interaction causes the spin to precess inbetween two scatterers around an axis which changes with the momentum vector of the itinerant electron. This effective field can cause WAL. With the definition G R/A E (p′ ,p) = 〈 ∣ ∣∣∣ p ′ 1 E −H 0 ∓iη the conductivity can be rewritten to the following form σ = with the propagator of density 〉 ∣ p , (3.8) e 2 ∑ πm 2 p x p ′ x eVol ×〈GR (p,p ′ )G A (p ′ ,p)〉 imp , (3.9) p,p ′ Γ(p,p ′ ) = 〈G R (p,p ′ )G A (p ′ ,p)〉 imp , (3.10) where impurity averaging products of Green’s functions of the type 〈G R G R 〉 and 〈G A G A 〉 yield small corrections of order 1/E F τ and will be neglected (AppendixB.1). The first approximation one can apply is to assume 〈G R (p,p ′ )G A (p ′ ,p)〉 imp ≈ 〈G R (p)〉 imp 〈G A (p)〉 imp , (3.11)

Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spin Relaxation in Confined Systems 31 where we used the definition G R/A (p) ≡ G R/A (p,p ′ )δ p,p ′. The average over impurities can be depicted diagrammatically, ( 〈G〉 imp = + + ) ( + + + + + + ) where the fermion line +··· , (3.12) denotes the unperturbed Green’s function. For uncorrelated disorder potential, 〈V(x)V(x ′ )〉 = δ(x−x ′ )/2πντ, as we will use in the following, we perform the disorder average in first-order Born approximation and get G R E(p) = = 1 E −H 0 (p)+i 1 , (3.13) 2τ whereG A E (p) is its complex conjugate, respectively. H 0 is the Hamiltonian without disorder potential V. The impurity vertex (the cross) is given by 1/2πντ. Until now we have the same information in the scattering time τ as we would gain from the Drude formula. Assuming low temperature, we can simplify Eq.(3.9) to e 2 ∑ σ = πm 2 e Vol p 2 x ×〈G R (p)〉 imp 〈G A (p)〉 imp (3.14) p e 2 ∑ = πm 2 e Vol p 2 x ×G R (p)G A (p) (3.15) = p e 2 ∑ p 2 x πm 2 e Vol p (E F −E p ) 2 + ( ) 1 2 (3.16) 2τ which can be simplified in the metallic regime, E F ≫ 1/τ, where the dominant contribution is given by energies close to E F , to e 2 ∫ ∞ ( ) E2me ≈ πm 2 dE(Volρ(E)) eVol d ≈ 2 e2 m e ρ(E F )E F 1 d 0 ∫ ∞ ∞ dE 1 (E F −E) 2 + ( 1 2τ 1 (E F −E) 2 + ( 1 2τ ) 2 (3.17) ) 2 (3.18) = e2 nτ m e , (3.19)

Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and <strong>Sp<strong>in</strong></strong> Relaxation <strong>in</strong> Conf<strong>in</strong>ed Systems 31<br />

where we used the def<strong>in</strong>ition G R/A (p) ≡ G R/A (p,p ′ )δ p,p ′. The average over impurities can<br />

be depicted diagrammatically,<br />

(<br />

〈G〉 imp = + +<br />

) (<br />

+ +<br />

+ +<br />

+ +<br />

)<br />

where the fermion l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

+··· , (3.12)<br />

denotes the unperturbed Green’s function. For uncorrelated<br />

disorder potential, 〈V(x)V(x ′ )〉 = δ(x−x ′ )/2πντ, as we will use <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g, we perform<br />

the disorder average <strong>in</strong> first-order Born approximation and get<br />

G R E(p) = =<br />

1<br />

E −H 0 (p)+i 1 , (3.13)<br />

2τ<br />

whereG A E (p) is its complex conjugate, respectively. H 0 is the Hamiltonian without disorder<br />

potential V. The impurity vertex (the cross) is given by 1/2πντ. Until now we have<br />

the same <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> the scatter<strong>in</strong>g time τ as we would ga<strong>in</strong> from the Drude formula.<br />

Assum<strong>in</strong>g low temperature, we can simplify Eq.(3.9) to<br />

e 2 ∑<br />

σ =<br />

πm 2 e Vol p 2 x ×〈G R (p)〉 imp 〈G A (p)〉 imp (3.14)<br />

p<br />

e 2 ∑<br />

=<br />

πm 2 e Vol p 2 x ×G R (p)G A (p) (3.15)<br />

=<br />

p<br />

e 2 ∑ p 2 x<br />

πm 2 e Vol p (E F −E p ) 2 + ( )<br />

1 2<br />

(3.16)<br />

2τ<br />

which can be simplified <strong>in</strong> the metallic regime, E F ≫ 1/τ, where the dom<strong>in</strong>ant contribution<br />

is given by energies close to E F , to<br />

e 2 ∫ ∞<br />

( ) E2me<br />

≈<br />

πm 2 dE(Volρ(E))<br />

eVol<br />

d<br />

≈ 2 e2<br />

m e<br />

ρ(E F )E F<br />

1<br />

d<br />

0<br />

∫ ∞<br />

∞<br />

dE<br />

1<br />

(E F −E) 2 + ( 1<br />

2τ<br />

1<br />

(E F −E) 2 + ( 1<br />

2τ<br />

) 2<br />

(3.17)<br />

) 2<br />

(3.18)<br />

= e2 nτ<br />

m e<br />

, (3.19)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!