Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University
Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University
30 Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spin Relaxation in Confined Systems (a) (b) Figure 3.3: Exemplification of the second term in Eq.(3.4): Interference of electrons traveling in the opposite direction along the same path causes an enhanced back-scattering, the WL effect. (a) Closed electron paths enclose a magnetic flux from an external magnetic field, indicated as the red arrow, breaking time reversal symmetry, breaking constructive interference. (b) The entanglement of spin and charge by SO interaction causes the spin to precess inbetween two scatterers around an axis which changes with the momentum vector of the itinerant electron. This effective field can cause WAL. With the definition G R/A E (p′ ,p) = 〈 ∣ ∣∣∣ p ′ 1 E −H 0 ∓iη the conductivity can be rewritten to the following form σ = with the propagator of density 〉 ∣ p , (3.8) e 2 ∑ πm 2 p x p ′ x eVol ×〈GR (p,p ′ )G A (p ′ ,p)〉 imp , (3.9) p,p ′ Γ(p,p ′ ) = 〈G R (p,p ′ )G A (p ′ ,p)〉 imp , (3.10) where impurity averaging products of Green’s functions of the type 〈G R G R 〉 and 〈G A G A 〉 yield small corrections of order 1/E F τ and will be neglected (AppendixB.1). The first approximation one can apply is to assume 〈G R (p,p ′ )G A (p ′ ,p)〉 imp ≈ 〈G R (p)〉 imp 〈G A (p)〉 imp , (3.11)
Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spin Relaxation in Confined Systems 31 where we used the definition G R/A (p) ≡ G R/A (p,p ′ )δ p,p ′. The average over impurities can be depicted diagrammatically, ( 〈G〉 imp = + + ) ( + + + + + + ) where the fermion line +··· , (3.12) denotes the unperturbed Green’s function. For uncorrelated disorder potential, 〈V(x)V(x ′ )〉 = δ(x−x ′ )/2πντ, as we will use in the following, we perform the disorder average in first-order Born approximation and get G R E(p) = = 1 E −H 0 (p)+i 1 , (3.13) 2τ whereG A E (p) is its complex conjugate, respectively. H 0 is the Hamiltonian without disorder potential V. The impurity vertex (the cross) is given by 1/2πντ. Until now we have the same information in the scattering time τ as we would gain from the Drude formula. Assuming low temperature, we can simplify Eq.(3.9) to e 2 ∑ σ = πm 2 e Vol p 2 x ×〈G R (p)〉 imp 〈G A (p)〉 imp (3.14) p e 2 ∑ = πm 2 e Vol p 2 x ×G R (p)G A (p) (3.15) = p e 2 ∑ p 2 x πm 2 e Vol p (E F −E p ) 2 + ( ) 1 2 (3.16) 2τ which can be simplified in the metallic regime, E F ≫ 1/τ, where the dominant contribution is given by energies close to E F , to e 2 ∫ ∞ ( ) E2me ≈ πm 2 dE(Volρ(E)) eVol d ≈ 2 e2 m e ρ(E F )E F 1 d 0 ∫ ∞ ∞ dE 1 (E F −E) 2 + ( 1 2τ 1 (E F −E) 2 + ( 1 2τ ) 2 (3.17) ) 2 (3.18) = e2 nτ m e , (3.19)
- Page 1 and 2: Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structur
- Page 3 and 4: Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structur
- Page 5 and 6: Contents v 3.2.2 Weak Localization
- Page 7 and 8: Citations to Previously Published W
- Page 9 and 10: Dedicated to Linda, my parents and
- Page 11 and 12: Chapter 1 Introduction Structure of
- Page 13 and 14: Chapter 1: Introduction 3 the coupl
- Page 15 and 16: Chapter 1: Introduction 5 Throughou
- Page 17 and 18: Chapter 2: Spin Dynamics: Overview
- Page 19 and 20: Chapter 2: Spin Dynamics: Overview
- Page 21 and 22: Chapter 2: Spin Dynamics: Overview
- Page 23 and 24: Chapter 2: Spin Dynamics: Overview
- Page 25 and 26: Chapter 2: Spin Dynamics: Overview
- Page 27 and 28: Chapter 2: Spin Dynamics: Overview
- Page 29 and 30: Chapter 2: Spin Dynamics: Overview
- Page 31 and 32: Chapter 2: Spin Dynamics: Overview
- Page 33 and 34: Chapter 2: Spin Dynamics: Overview
- Page 35 and 36: Chapter 3 WL/WAL Crossover and Spin
- Page 37 and 38: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 39: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 43 and 44: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 45 and 46: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 47 and 48: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 49 and 50: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 51 and 52: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 53 and 54: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 55 and 56: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 57 and 58: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 59 and 60: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 61 and 62: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 63 and 64: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 65 and 66: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 67 and 68: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 69 and 70: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 71 and 72: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 73 and 74: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 75 and 76: Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and Spi
- Page 77 and 78: Chapter 4 Direction Dependence of S
- Page 79 and 80: Chapter 4: Direction Dependence of
- Page 81 and 82: Chapter 4: Direction Dependence of
- Page 83 and 84: Chapter 4: Direction Dependence of
- Page 85 and 86: Chapter 4: Direction Dependence of
- Page 87 and 88: Chapter 4: Direction Dependence of
- Page 89 and 90: Chapter 4: Direction Dependence of
Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and <strong>Sp<strong>in</strong></strong> Relaxation <strong>in</strong> Conf<strong>in</strong>ed Systems 31<br />
where we used the def<strong>in</strong>ition G R/A (p) ≡ G R/A (p,p ′ )δ p,p ′. The average over impurities can<br />
be depicted diagrammatically,<br />
(<br />
〈G〉 imp = + +<br />
) (<br />
+ +<br />
+ +<br />
+ +<br />
)<br />
where the fermion l<strong>in</strong>e<br />
+··· , (3.12)<br />
denotes the unperturbed Green’s function. For uncorrelated<br />
disorder potential, 〈V(x)V(x ′ )〉 = δ(x−x ′ )/2πντ, as we will use <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g, we perform<br />
the disorder average <strong>in</strong> first-order Born approximation and get<br />
G R E(p) = =<br />
1<br />
E −H 0 (p)+i 1 , (3.13)<br />
2τ<br />
whereG A E (p) is its complex conjugate, respectively. H 0 is the Hamiltonian without disorder<br />
potential V. The impurity vertex (the cross) is given by 1/2πντ. Until now we have<br />
the same <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> the scatter<strong>in</strong>g time τ as we would ga<strong>in</strong> from the Drude formula.<br />
Assum<strong>in</strong>g low temperature, we can simplify Eq.(3.9) to<br />
e 2 ∑<br />
σ =<br />
πm 2 e Vol p 2 x ×〈G R (p)〉 imp 〈G A (p)〉 imp (3.14)<br />
p<br />
e 2 ∑<br />
=<br />
πm 2 e Vol p 2 x ×G R (p)G A (p) (3.15)<br />
=<br />
p<br />
e 2 ∑ p 2 x<br />
πm 2 e Vol p (E F −E p ) 2 + ( )<br />
1 2<br />
(3.16)<br />
2τ<br />
which can be simplified <strong>in</strong> the metallic regime, E F ≫ 1/τ, where the dom<strong>in</strong>ant contribution<br />
is given by energies close to E F , to<br />
e 2 ∫ ∞<br />
( ) E2me<br />
≈<br />
πm 2 dE(Volρ(E))<br />
eVol<br />
d<br />
≈ 2 e2<br />
m e<br />
ρ(E F )E F<br />
1<br />
d<br />
0<br />
∫ ∞<br />
∞<br />
dE<br />
1<br />
(E F −E) 2 + ( 1<br />
2τ<br />
1<br />
(E F −E) 2 + ( 1<br />
2τ<br />
) 2<br />
(3.17)<br />
) 2<br />
(3.18)<br />
= e2 nτ<br />
m e<br />
, (3.19)