11.03.2014 Views

Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University

Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University

Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

30 Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and <strong>Sp<strong>in</strong></strong> Relaxation <strong>in</strong> Conf<strong>in</strong>ed Systems<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

Figure 3.3: Exemplification <strong>of</strong> the second term <strong>in</strong> Eq.(3.4): Interference <strong>of</strong> electrons travel<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> the opposite direction along the same path causes an enhanced back-scatter<strong>in</strong>g, the<br />

WL effect. (a) Closed electron paths enclose a magnetic flux from an external magnetic<br />

field, <strong>in</strong>dicated as the red arrow, break<strong>in</strong>g time reversal symmetry, break<strong>in</strong>g constructive<br />

<strong>in</strong>terference. (b) The entanglement <strong>of</strong> sp<strong>in</strong> and charge by SO <strong>in</strong>teraction causes the sp<strong>in</strong> to<br />

precess <strong>in</strong>between two scatterers around an axis which changes with the momentum vector<br />

<strong>of</strong> the it<strong>in</strong>erant electron. This effective field can cause WAL.<br />

With the def<strong>in</strong>ition<br />

G R/A<br />

E (p′ ,p) =<br />

〈 ∣ ∣∣∣<br />

p ′ 1<br />

E −H 0 ∓iη<br />

the conductivity can be rewritten to the follow<strong>in</strong>g form<br />

σ =<br />

with the propagator <strong>of</strong> density<br />

〉<br />

∣ p , (3.8)<br />

e 2 ∑<br />

πm 2 p x p ′ x<br />

eVol<br />

×〈GR (p,p ′ )G A (p ′ ,p)〉 imp , (3.9)<br />

p,p ′<br />

Γ(p,p ′ ) = 〈G R (p,p ′ )G A (p ′ ,p)〉 imp , (3.10)<br />

where impurity averag<strong>in</strong>g products <strong>of</strong> Green’s functions <strong>of</strong> the type 〈G R G R 〉 and 〈G A G A 〉<br />

yield small corrections <strong>of</strong> order 1/E F τ and will be neglected (AppendixB.1).<br />

The first approximation one can apply is to assume<br />

〈G R (p,p ′ )G A (p ′ ,p)〉 imp ≈ 〈G R (p)〉 imp 〈G A (p)〉 imp , (3.11)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!