10.03.2014 Views

Bibliometriske kort og citationsanalyse som vidensorganiserende ...

Bibliometriske kort og citationsanalyse som vidensorganiserende ...

Bibliometriske kort og citationsanalyse som vidensorganiserende ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Bibliometriske</strong> <strong>kort</strong> <strong>og</strong><br />

<strong>citationsanalyse</strong> <strong>som</strong><br />

<strong>vidensorganiserende</strong><br />

metoder<br />

Jeppe Nicolaisen<br />

Lektor, Ph.d.<br />

Danmarks Biblioteksskole


Det kan forekomme nærved blasfemisk at<br />

påstå, at man kan sige n<strong>og</strong>et centralt om<br />

videnskab bare ved at tælle antal sider<br />

eller antal tidsskrifter på et felt. Er man<br />

ikke nødt til at læse afhandlingerne, for at<br />

se om de er n<strong>og</strong>et værd?<br />

Tor Nørretranders (2007, s. 126)


Fremover bør vi anlægge internationale,<br />

objektive kriterier for tildeling af<br />

forskningsmidler. Det vil bringe dansk<br />

forskning op i verdensklasse. Objektiv,<br />

international vurdering af forskningens<br />

kvalitet gør det meget nemt at kende<br />

excellent forskning fra den jævne<br />

forskning.<br />

Børge Grønne Nordestgaard (2007, s. 9)


Bibliometri<br />

All studies which seek to quantify<br />

processes of written communication<br />

Pritchard (1969, s. 348)


Bibliometriens anvendelser<br />

• Informationssøgning<br />

- Referencer, citationer, links<br />

• Forskningsevaluering<br />

- Forfattere, tidsskrifter, institutioner, lande<br />

- ’Collection management’<br />

• Vidensorganisation<br />

- Klyngeanalyse, bibliometriske <strong>kort</strong>


Grundlæggende metoder<br />

• Publikationsanalyse<br />

• Citationsanalyse


Publikationsanalyse<br />

• Kvantitative målinger på dokumentsamlinger.<br />

• Oftest optællinger af indholdet i et eller flere af<br />

de bibli<strong>og</strong>rafiske felter i en afgrænset del af en<br />

bibli<strong>og</strong>rafisk database.<br />

• Bl.a. optællinger af forfatteres, institutioners eller<br />

landes videnskabelige produktion fordelt på<br />

emne, tidsskrifter osv.


Citationsanalyse<br />

• Kvantitative studier af dokumenters litteraturlister<br />

• Man skelner mellem to former for<br />

<strong>citationsanalyse</strong>r:<br />

- Referencer fra en samling dokumenter<br />

- Citationer til en samling dokumenter


eference<br />

A citation B<br />

Tid<br />

Dokument B refererer til dokument A. Dokument A modtager en citation fra dokument B.


Citationsdata<br />

generelle problemer<br />

Seglen (1996) [oversat fra norsk]:<br />

• References are selected because of their usefulness for the author,<br />

which is <strong>som</strong>ething different from their quality<br />

• Only a small fraction of all used material is cited<br />

• General knowledge is not cited<br />

• Knowledge is often cited from secondary sources<br />

• Documents supporting an authors arguments are cited more often than<br />

other documents<br />

• Flattering (citing editors, potential referees and other authorities)<br />

• Show-of (citing hot new “in”-articles)<br />

• Reference copying (references provided by other authors)<br />

• Conventions. In biochemistry, for example, methods are cited but not<br />

reagents<br />

• Self citations


Bibliometriens forsvar<br />

Small (1987, s. 339):<br />

The issue is not whether we can rely on reference lists in<br />

individual cases as complete sets of influences (we cannot), but<br />

rather whether references can be used statistically, in the<br />

aggregate, as an indicator of influence.<br />

Nederhof & Van Raan (1987, s. 326):<br />

… by no means the assumption is necessary, that scientists cite<br />

in their papers all work used in their research but still, citations<br />

can be used to monitor scientific influence.


Bibliometriens forsvar<br />

Cawkell (1976, s. 3):<br />

Citation anomalies [in sence of ”excessive selfcitations,<br />

plagiarism of references, careless or<br />

omitted references etc.] have little effect - they<br />

are like random noise in the presence of strong<br />

repetitive signals.


Gennemsnitsmantraet<br />

Citation analysts assume that the<br />

biases and deficiencies of individual<br />

citers are repaired to a tolerable<br />

degree by the combined activity of<br />

the many.<br />

White (2001, s. 102)


Gennemsnitsmantraet<br />

Altså:<br />

Hvis <strong>citationsanalyse</strong>r foretages på store datamængder vil man<br />

f.eks. kunne eftervise en nøje sammenhæng mellem kvalitet OG<br />

antal citationer.<br />

Jo flere citationer – jo større kvalitet…<br />

Citationer<br />

Kvalitet


Bornsteins hypotese<br />

If a relationship between citation<br />

frequency and research quality does<br />

exist, this relationship is not likely to be<br />

linear. The relationship between<br />

research quality and citation frequency<br />

probably takes the form of a J-shaped<br />

curve.<br />

(Bornstein 1991, s. 31)


Citationsfrekvens<br />

Ekspertvurdering


J-kurve?<br />

1. En samling dokumenter<br />

2. En samling ekspertvurderinger af 1<br />

3. En samling citationer til 1<br />

Stikprøven:<br />

1. Bøger anmeldet i tidsskriftet Contemporary Sociol<strong>og</strong>y<br />

mellem 1985-1994<br />

2. Ratings fra databasen Sociol<strong>og</strong>ical Abstracts<br />

3. Citationer søgt i Social Science Citation Index (5-års<br />

citationsvindue)


20,00<br />

Citations (independent variable)<br />

15,00<br />

10,00<br />

5,00<br />

0,00<br />

Favorable<br />

Very favorable<br />

Neutral<br />

Very unfavorable<br />

Unfavorable<br />

Evaluation (dependent variable)<br />

Nicolaisen, J. (2002).<br />

The J-shaped distribution of citedness.<br />

Journal of Documentation, 58(4): 383-395.<br />

Resultat (medianen)<br />

W<br />

W<br />

W<br />

W<br />

W


<strong>Bibliometriske</strong> <strong>kort</strong><br />

Kort over viden<strong>som</strong>råde baseret på<br />

co-citation eller bibli<strong>og</strong>rafisk kobling<br />

Ofte visualiseres relationer mellem<br />

citerede forfattere, tidsskrifter eller<br />

institutioner, men f.eks. kan den<br />

semantiske distance mellem begreber<br />

<strong>og</strong>så visualiseres i sådanne <strong>kort</strong>


Co-citation<br />

B<br />

A<br />

C<br />

A <strong>og</strong> B findes begge i C’s litteraturliste


Bibli<strong>og</strong>rafisk kobling<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

A findes både i B <strong>og</strong> C’s litteraturliste


Citationsnetværk<br />

14 <strong>og</strong> 17 er bibli<strong>og</strong>rafisk koblede 3 <strong>og</strong> 4 er co-citerede


Co-citationsmatrix<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15<br />

2 612<br />

3 935 536<br />

4 338 236 270<br />

5 0 0 0 0<br />

6 69 21 50 7 94<br />

7 4 0 6 1 283 360<br />

8 27 7 34 4 101 2025 555<br />

9 18 3 16 1 98 113 42 45<br />

10 35 6 30 2 136 80 28 40 2817<br />

11 9 4 11 2 88 165 22 44 3086 2151<br />

12 20 11 26 5 95 192 20 42 3241 2172 4479<br />

13 10 5 14 2 94 83 7 30 787 589 371 430<br />

14 14 7 14 1 75 99 13 37 660 452 352 405 8213<br />

15 22 11 17 1 126 106 11 44 606 650 374 420 13327 9790<br />

16 23 13 29 1 290 242 30 79 1251 1006 808 994 28405 * 18075 31330 *<br />

Co-citationsfrekvenser for 16 psykol<strong>og</strong>itidsskrifter (Nicolaisen, 2004)


Statistisk dataanalyse


Cocitation map of library and information science research, 2000-2004 (Åström, 2007)


Man bliver hvad man spiser!<br />

Åström (2007)


Fortolkning<br />

Citation analysis is not a shortcut to be<br />

used as a substitute for thinking<br />

(f.eks. Egghe & Rousseau, 1990, s. 226)


Introduction to Informetrics (1990)<br />

We expect this book to be of help to the informetrics<br />

teacher in organising his or her course and to be<br />

interesting and useful both as a course book and as a<br />

background reading for students in library and<br />

information science (Egghe & Rousseau 1990, s. v).


Fortolkning<br />

Citationsteori


Kulturel disciplinering<br />

Begreber, mening, viden,<br />

informationsbehov, relevanskriterier, etc.<br />

formes i diskursfællesskaber, f.eks. i<br />

videnskabelige discipliner, fag,<br />

domæner.


Domæneanalyse<br />

Forstå domænets<br />

- Ontol<strong>og</strong>i<br />

- Epistemol<strong>og</strong>i<br />

- Sociol<strong>og</strong>i


Fortolkningens grundlag<br />

• Videnskabsfilosofi<br />

• Videnskabshistorie<br />

• Videnskabssociol<strong>og</strong>i


Referencer<br />

• Bornstein, R.F. (1991). The predictive validity of peer review: A neglected issue.<br />

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14(1): 138-139.<br />

• Cawkell, A.E. (1976). Understanding science by analysing its literature. The<br />

Information Scientist, 10(1): 3-10.<br />

• Egghe, L. & Rousseau, R. (1990). Introduction to Informetrics: Quantitative Methods<br />

in Library, Documentation and Information Science. Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier.<br />

• Nederhof, A.J. & Van Raan, A.F.J. (1987). Citation theory and the Ortega hypothesis.<br />

Scientometrics, 12(5-6): 325-328.<br />

• Nicolaisen, J. (2004). Social Behavior and Scientific Practice – Missing Pieces of the<br />

Citation Puzzle [Ph.d.-afhandling]. København: Danmarks Bibliotekskole.<br />

• Nordestgaard, B. G. (2007). Et strejf af nepotisme [Kronik]. Jyllands-Posten, 27.<br />

august.<br />

• Nørretranders, T. (2007). Civilisation 2.0: Miljø, fællesskab <strong>og</strong> verdensbillede i<br />

linkenes tidsalder. [Frederiksberg]: Thaning & Appel.


• Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibli<strong>og</strong>raphy or Bibliometrics?. Journal of<br />

Documentation, 24: 348-349.<br />

• Seglen, P.O. (1996). Bruk av siteringer <strong>og</strong> tidsskriftimpaktfaktor til<br />

forskningsevaluering. Biblioteksarbejde, 48: 27-34.<br />

• Small, H. (1987). The significance of bibli<strong>og</strong>raphic references. Scientometrics, 12(5-<br />

6): 339-341.<br />

• White, H.D. (2001). Authors as citers over time. Journal of the American Society for<br />

Information Science and Technol<strong>og</strong>y, 52(2): 87-108.<br />

• Åström, F. (2007). Changes in the LIS research front: Time-sliced cocitation analyses<br />

of LIS journal articles, 1990-2004. Journal of the American Society for Information<br />

Science and Technol<strong>og</strong>y, 58(7): 947-957.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!