10.03.2014 Views

Kyne & Simpfendorfer.. - Shark Specialist Group

Kyne & Simpfendorfer.. - Shark Specialist Group

Kyne & Simpfendorfer.. - Shark Specialist Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF EXTANT DEEPWATER CHONDRICHTHYAN<br />

FISHES<br />

Introduction<br />

Systematics and classification<br />

The following checklist contains all known described and undescribed deepwater species of<br />

the Class Chondrichthyes. The definition of a deepwater chondrichthyan is outlined in the<br />

general introduction of this report. The checklist is based largely upon Compagno and Duffy<br />

(2003) A checklist of deep water chondrichthyans of the world and Compagno (2005) Global<br />

checklist of living chondrichthyan fishes. Additionally, the present list contains recent species<br />

discoveries and descriptions, synonymy, and taxonomic changes and updates since<br />

preparation of the above-mentioned checklists, that is, up until January 2007. Primary<br />

literature (in the form of species descriptions and reviews), grey literature (in the form of in<br />

internal reports and conference abstracts books) and consultation with researchers possessing<br />

expert knowledge of taxonomic groups were used to update the checklist.<br />

Phylogeny and systematic arrangement of the checklist follows Compagno (2001, 2005) with<br />

the Holocephali here presented first, followed by the squalomorph sharks (incorporating the<br />

batoids) and finally the galeomorph sharks.<br />

Two of the notable discrepancies arising from following Compagno (2001, 2005) between the<br />

present checklist and other classifications concern the batoids. Firstly, several authors classify<br />

the batoids into numerous orders, but these are here considered suborders within the order<br />

Rajiformes. Suborders are not specified in the present checklist but these can be obtained<br />

from Compagno (2005). Secondly, the systematics and classification of the skates (suborder<br />

Rajoidei) is among the most complex and unresolved and the softnose and hardnose skates<br />

are often classified into two subfamilies within the single family Rajidae: the<br />

Arhynchobatinae (softnose skates) and the Rajinae (hardnose skates). However, these are here<br />

referred to as the families Arhynchobatidae (softnose skates) and Rajidae (hardnose skates).<br />

Differences in the systematics and classification in the present list to that in Compagno (2005)<br />

concern recent systematic updates and these are briefly summarised as follows. 1). The<br />

classification of the Australasian skate fauna follows Last and Yearsley (2002) (with the<br />

exception of familial classification) along with recent descriptions (i.e. New Zealand<br />

Brochiraja; Last and McEachran 2006); 2). Whereas Compagno (2005) placed several<br />

Southwest Atlantic and Southeast Pacific Bathyraja into Rhinoraja they are here retained in<br />

Bathyraja due to a lack of explanation for their placement in Rhinoraja; and, 3). The<br />

systematics of the Indo-West Pacific Centrophorus are currently under review and this is<br />

reflected in the checklist (W. White pers. comm.).<br />

The scientific name of each species is followed by the authority and year of publication for<br />

the description of that species. Parentheses around the authority and year indicate that the<br />

species name has changed since the original description. For example, the smallspine<br />

spookfish Harriotta haeckeli was described by Karrer in 1972 as the binomial name Harriotta<br />

haeckeli and is thus referred to as Harriotta haeckeli Karrer, 1972. The sicklefin chimaera<br />

Neoharriotta pinnata however, was originally described by Schnakenbeck in 1931 as<br />

Harriotta pinnata before being reassigned to the new genus Neoharriotta; it is thus referred to<br />

as Neoharriotta pinnata (Schnakenbeck, 1931). Where a species has not yet been formally<br />

described, that is, it has not been given a specific name and its description has not been<br />

published, it is often assigned a temporary letter or numerical code followed by a name of the<br />

researcher or publication which identified the species as distinct and new, and whom may be<br />

working on the relationship of this species to its congeners and ultimately its description. An<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!