Benchmarking Efficiency of Sustainable Urban Transport in China

Benchmarking Efficiency of Sustainable Urban Transport in China Benchmarking Efficiency of Sustainable Urban Transport in China

its.berkeley.edu
from its.berkeley.edu More from this publisher
10.03.2014 Views

Challenges 4 : How to support the economic development by improving the reliability and service quality of the public transport? 35.00% Survey in Beijing 32.80% Beijing 30.00% 27.50% 26.25% 25.00% 20.00% 21.20% 19.55% 21.08% 21.67% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% 6.50% 7.10% 4.90% 6.02% 5.45% 车 内 太 挤 行 车 不 准 时 等 车 时 间 太 长 票 价 太 高 服 务 态 度 差 不 方 便 2000 年 2002 年

Great shortage in public transport investment ration(%) 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 Road construction Public transport 10 0 1990-1995 1995-2000 2001-2005 Cycling is also decreasing…. 出 行 比 例 (%) 70 60 50 40 1986 2000 2005 30 20 10 0 Cycling 自 行 车 Public 公 交 transport 小 Car 汽 车

Great shortage <strong>in</strong><br />

public transport<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestment<br />

ration(%)<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

Road construction<br />

Public transport<br />

10<br />

0<br />

1990-1995 1995-2000 2001-2005<br />

Cycl<strong>in</strong>g is also<br />

decreas<strong>in</strong>g….<br />

出 行 比 例 (%)<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

1986<br />

2000<br />

2005<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Cycl<strong>in</strong>g 自 行 车 Public 公 交 transport 小 Car 汽 车

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!