Benchmarking Efficiency of Sustainable Urban Transport in China
Benchmarking Efficiency of Sustainable Urban Transport in China Benchmarking Efficiency of Sustainable Urban Transport in China
Modal Split Tokyo —— Share of Public Transport, Marseille Nancy Lyons Walk and Bicycle Munich Nagoya Hamburger Amsterdam New York Toronto Chicago San Francisco Nanning Shanghai Wuhan Taiyuan Chengdu Nanjing Hefei Ningbo Beijing Guangzhou Shijiazhuang Chongqing Guiyang Hangzhou Dalian Lanzhou Share of walk, bicycle and public transport Chinese citizens prefer to choose walk, bicycle, and public transport as commuter comparing with the developed country cities. However, there are challenges to keep such trends in the procedure of economic development and private car increase.
Challenges 7 : How to provide safer urban road and transport systems to promote the increasing of the city’s competence? Traffic Death
- Page 1 and 2: Benchmarking Efficiency of Sustaina
- Page 3 and 4: Infrastructure —Road area ratio T
- Page 5 and 6: Restraint factors: •The long term
- Page 7 and 8: Modal Split —— private car 98%
- Page 9 and 10: Great shortage in public transport
- Page 11 and 12: Infrastructure — Length of urban
- Page 13 and 14: Satisfaction ——Investigation Re
- Page 15 and 16: Environmental Pollution Good 35.2%
- Page 17: •E-bike” in China Rapid develo
- Page 21 and 22: Development stage in China Field Pa
- Page 23 and 24: Vision ——Sustainable Urban Tran
- Page 25 and 26: 2. Prioritize Public Transport in U
- Page 27 and 28: 3. Coordinate Transport and Land Us
- Page 29 and 30: Before Case: Limited the usage of p
- Page 31 and 32: International Workshop on Integrate
Challenges 7 :<br />
How to provide safer urban road and transport systems<br />
to promote the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the city’s competence?<br />
Traffic Death
Change language