Benchmarking Efficiency of Sustainable Urban Transport in China
Benchmarking Efficiency of Sustainable Urban Transport in China
Benchmarking Efficiency of Sustainable Urban Transport in China
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Modal Split<br />
—— Public<br />
<strong>Transport</strong><br />
Compare with the <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
developed cities, the rate <strong>of</strong> bus<br />
trips <strong>in</strong> public transport <strong>in</strong><br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>ese cities is higher, but the<br />
rate <strong>of</strong> rail transit <strong>in</strong> public<br />
transport is much lower.<br />
For example :<br />
Tokyo: 85%<br />
New York: 70%<br />
Nagoya: 83.5%<br />
Chicago: 45.5%<br />
Seoul<br />
Hamburger<br />
Munich<br />
Toronto<br />
New York<br />
Tokyo<br />
Nagoya<br />
Chicago<br />
San Francisco<br />
Amsterdam<br />
Lyons<br />
Nancy<br />
Marseilles<br />
Shijiazhuang<br />
Nann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Zhengzhou<br />
Chengdu<br />
Taiyuan<br />
Changsha<br />
N<strong>in</strong>gbo<br />
Beij<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Hefei<br />
Lanzhou<br />
Nanj<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Hangzhou<br />
Wuhan<br />
Shanghai<br />
Guiyang<br />
Chongq<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Guanghzou<br />
Dalian<br />
Share <strong>of</strong> bus trip<br />
31<br />
30.7<br />
26.8<br />
22.4<br />
18.7<br />
16.9<br />
11.5 14<br />
10.8<br />
9.8<br />
2.87<br />
5.8<br />
6.5<br />
10.2<br />
11<br />
13.2<br />
13.2<br />
16<br />
19.9<br />
20.2<br />
20.95<br />
22.2<br />
23<br />
24<br />
26.6<br />
28<br />
32<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70<br />
42<br />
42<br />
54<br />
66.2<br />
%
Change language