10.03.2014 Views

Benchmarking Efficiency of Sustainable Urban Transport in China

Benchmarking Efficiency of Sustainable Urban Transport in China

Benchmarking Efficiency of Sustainable Urban Transport in China

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Benchmark<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Efficiency</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Susta<strong>in</strong>able</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

——7 Challenges & 5 Strategic Priorities<br />

Dr. WU Hongyang<br />

CUSTReC<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a Academy <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transport</strong>ation Sciences-CATS, MOT<br />

wuhy82@163.com<br />

May. 2008


Challenge 1:<br />

Capacity Build<strong>in</strong>g to Adapt to Socio-Economic Needs<br />

Motorization<br />

<strong>Urban</strong>ization<br />

GDP Increase<br />

1978-2000 8-9%<br />

2000-2020 7%<br />

URBANIZATION:<br />

1978:17.8%<br />

2007:43.9%<br />

2020:57%<br />

Increase Rate 2020<br />

(100 million vehicles)<br />

Civil vehicles: 13% 1.3<br />

Private vehicles: 23% 0.8<br />

cars/1000persons<br />

900<br />

800<br />

Great Potential <strong>of</strong> Private car Increase<br />

Private car ownership:<br />

2007: 2%;<br />

2020: 6%<br />

764<br />

1998~2007, annual growth<br />

rate <strong>in</strong> GDP share <strong>of</strong> the<br />

national total by cities:7.0%<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

428<br />

501<br />

523<br />

598<br />

Annual average <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>of</strong><br />

vehicle trips 1998-2020: 9.0%<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

136<br />

64<br />

6 22<br />

I<strong>in</strong>dia Ch<strong>in</strong>a Brazil Mexico Briton France Japan Canada USA


Infrastructure<br />

—Road area ratio<br />

The road <strong>in</strong>frastructure volume is lower than developed country’s cities. It is big challenge to<br />

promote the <strong>in</strong>frastructure construction <strong>in</strong> the rapid motorized transport <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a


Challenges 2 :<br />

How to relieve the transport congestion and improve<br />

transport efficiency?<br />

Beij<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

• Travel time <strong>of</strong> 40% commuters<br />

per day >1 hour<br />

• Economic loss due to<br />

congestion : per day about 40<br />

million Yuan<br />

• Average speed <strong>of</strong> 11 roads <strong>in</strong> the<br />

city center is 12km/h<br />

Shanghai:<br />

GDP reduction caused by traffic<br />

congestion: 10%


Restra<strong>in</strong>t factors:<br />

•The long term mechanisms<br />

for TDM<br />

•Personal trip plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

•Real time traffic<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation by ITS<br />

•Road space separation and<br />

occupation for different<br />

travel mode<br />

•Infrastructure construction


Challenges 3 :<br />

While the needs <strong>of</strong> the reasonable private car can be meet,<br />

how to m<strong>in</strong>imize its negative impacts?<br />

With <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>come, which k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> transport mode will you use?


Modal Split<br />

—— private car<br />

98% residents<br />

without private cars<br />

San Francisco<br />

Chicago<br />

Toronto<br />

New York<br />

Amsterdam<br />

Hamburger<br />

Munich<br />

Nagoya<br />

Ly<br />

ons<br />

Nancy<br />

Marseilles<br />

Tokyo<br />

Beij<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Hefei<br />

Nanj<strong>in</strong>g<br />

N<strong>in</strong>gbo<br />

Tianj<strong>in</strong><br />

Guiyang<br />

2.57<br />

2.25<br />

1.19<br />

0.8<br />

7.22<br />

3.76<br />

Share <strong>of</strong> Private<br />

car<br />

24.2<br />

31.9<br />

38<br />

37.9<br />

36.5<br />

34.7<br />

44<br />

59.6<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80<br />

58<br />

63<br />

74.8<br />

74.3<br />

Restra<strong>in</strong>t factors:<br />

• People’s idea: pursue personal travel,<br />

and lack <strong>of</strong> the idea <strong>of</strong> energy sav<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

environment protection<br />

• Motor <strong>in</strong>dustry development & the<br />

negative effect <strong>of</strong> the vehicle (full life<br />

cycl<strong>in</strong>g cost analysis)<br />

• Crazy competition for the car-own<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Lack <strong>of</strong> the policies and measures to<br />

promote the rational use <strong>of</strong> the private<br />

car<br />

• Access and discard mechanism for the<br />

private car wait<strong>in</strong>g for ref<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

%


Challenges 4 :<br />

How to support the economic development by improv<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

reliability and service quality <strong>of</strong> the public transport?<br />

35.00%<br />

Survey <strong>in</strong> Beij<strong>in</strong>g<br />

32.80%<br />

Beij<strong>in</strong>g<br />

30.00%<br />

27.50%<br />

26.25%<br />

25.00%<br />

20.00%<br />

21.20%<br />

19.55%<br />

21.08%<br />

21.67%<br />

15.00%<br />

10.00%<br />

5.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

6.50%<br />

7.10%<br />

4.90%<br />

6.02%<br />

5.45%<br />

车 内 太 挤 行 车 不 准 时 等 车 时 间 太 长 票 价 太 高 服 务 态 度 差 不 方 便<br />

2000 年<br />

2002 年


Great shortage <strong>in</strong><br />

public transport<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestment<br />

ration(%)<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

Road construction<br />

Public transport<br />

10<br />

0<br />

1990-1995 1995-2000 2001-2005<br />

Cycl<strong>in</strong>g is also<br />

decreas<strong>in</strong>g….<br />

出 行 比 例 (%)<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

1986<br />

2000<br />

2005<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Cycl<strong>in</strong>g 自 行 车 Public 公 交 transport 小 Car 汽 车


Modal Split<br />

—— Public<br />

<strong>Transport</strong><br />

Compare with the <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

developed cities, the rate <strong>of</strong> bus<br />

trips <strong>in</strong> public transport <strong>in</strong><br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>ese cities is higher, but the<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> rail transit <strong>in</strong> public<br />

transport is much lower.<br />

For example :<br />

Tokyo: 85%<br />

New York: 70%<br />

Nagoya: 83.5%<br />

Chicago: 45.5%<br />

Seoul<br />

Hamburger<br />

Munich<br />

Toronto<br />

New York<br />

Tokyo<br />

Nagoya<br />

Chicago<br />

San Francisco<br />

Amsterdam<br />

Lyons<br />

Nancy<br />

Marseilles<br />

Shijiazhuang<br />

Nann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Zhengzhou<br />

Chengdu<br />

Taiyuan<br />

Changsha<br />

N<strong>in</strong>gbo<br />

Beij<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Hefei<br />

Lanzhou<br />

Nanj<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Hangzhou<br />

Wuhan<br />

Shanghai<br />

Guiyang<br />

Chongq<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Guanghzou<br />

Dalian<br />

Share <strong>of</strong> bus trip<br />

31<br />

30.7<br />

26.8<br />

22.4<br />

18.7<br />

16.9<br />

11.5 14<br />

10.8<br />

9.8<br />

2.87<br />

5.8<br />

6.5<br />

10.2<br />

11<br />

13.2<br />

13.2<br />

16<br />

19.9<br />

20.2<br />

20.95<br />

22.2<br />

23<br />

24<br />

26.6<br />

28<br />

32<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70<br />

42<br />

42<br />

54<br />

66.2<br />

%


Infrastructure<br />

— Length <strong>of</strong> urban metro<br />

500 Billon RMB<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestment<br />

needs for the<br />

new metro<br />

construction <strong>in</strong><br />

the future 10<br />

years<br />

Metro Mileage per million<br />

people<br />

Metro is an important way to reduce the transport congestion <strong>in</strong> the mega-cities <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, but the<br />

huge <strong>in</strong>vestment will be an severe challenge for the city’s government.


Beij<strong>in</strong>g Case<br />

2008:195km<br />

2010:250-300km<br />

2006:114km


Satisfaction<br />

——Investigation<br />

Restra<strong>in</strong>t factors:<br />

• Vehicle quality<br />

• Real-time <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

service<br />

• Road space<br />

• Subsidy mechanism<br />

• Mass public transport<br />

The f<strong>in</strong>al satisfaction score: 4.69<br />

Score: The highest is 9, the middle is 5,<br />

and the lowest is 1<br />

Un-satisfaction 不 满 意<br />

15%<br />

Satisfaction 满 意<br />

17%<br />

Just-so-so 一 般<br />

68%<br />

General Satisfaction 图 19 对 <strong>of</strong> 交 <strong>Urban</strong> 通 状 况 <strong>Transport</strong> 的 总 体 满 <strong>in</strong> 意 Chengdu 度 City


Challenges 5 :<br />

How to reduce transport pollution and emissions( <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g air<br />

pollution and noise) and improve the energy efficiency to achieve<br />

the clean and healthy transport systems?<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a: the 2nd largest oil consumption country and the 3rd largest oil import<br />

country. In 2007, 47% <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a’s oil was imported.<br />

Fuel economy <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a is 10~20% lower than that <strong>of</strong> developed countries.<br />

Oil consumption by the transport sector: 1/3 <strong>of</strong> the national total consumption; <strong>in</strong><br />

2020, 57%<br />

30000.0<br />

60.0<br />

10000 ton <strong>Transport</strong> use oil (ton)<br />

57.0<br />

(%)<br />

25000.0<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> use oil % share<br />

50.0<br />

25600.0<br />

43.0<br />

20000.0<br />

40.0<br />

15000.0<br />

10000.0<br />

17.8<br />

24.6<br />

13800.0<br />

30.0<br />

20.0<br />

5000.0<br />

0.0<br />

2863.6<br />

5509.4<br />

1995 2000 2010 2020<br />

10.0<br />

0.0


Environmental Pollution<br />

Good<br />

35.2%<br />

Excellent<br />

43.9%<br />

A 2007 survey <strong>of</strong> traffic noise <strong>in</strong> 401 cities:<br />

20.9% exceed<strong>in</strong>g standards<br />

Letters that compla<strong>in</strong>ed about noise<br />

pollution: 43% <strong>of</strong> all letters that compla<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

about environmental pollution<br />

Lightly polluted<br />

12.5% Polluted<br />

5.2%<br />

Heavily polluted<br />

3.2%<br />

100%<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> air pollution is shift<strong>in</strong>g from coal<br />

burn<strong>in</strong>g emissions to vehicle emissions<br />

Motor Vehicle<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

█ Others<br />

CO NO X<br />

HC<br />

30%


Challenges 6 :<br />

How to improve the social equity by provid<strong>in</strong>g multi transport<br />

services (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g bicycles, walk<strong>in</strong>g, buses, and rural buses)?<br />

Shijiazhuang<br />

N<strong>in</strong>gbo<br />

Chengdu<br />

Hangzhou<br />

Nanj<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Beij<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Taiyuan<br />

Hefei<br />

Nann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Wuhan<br />

Lanzhou<br />

Shanghai<br />

Guangzhou<br />

Dalian<br />

Guiyang<br />

Chongq<strong>in</strong>g<br />

36% residents<br />

own bicycles<br />

60% <strong>of</strong> the population lives <strong>in</strong> rural areas


•E-bike” <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

Rapid development <strong>of</strong> E-bike ——why not allowed to use?<br />

10,000 units<br />

2000<br />

1800<br />

1600<br />

1400<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

1950<br />

1121<br />

675.7<br />

399.7<br />

152.8<br />

5.8 14.8 29.3 58<br />

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006


Modal Split<br />

Tokyo<br />

—— Share <strong>of</strong> Public <strong>Transport</strong>,<br />

Marseille<br />

Nancy<br />

Lyons<br />

Walk and Bicycle<br />

Munich<br />

Nagoya<br />

Hamburger<br />

Amsterdam<br />

New York<br />

Toronto<br />

Chicago<br />

San Francisco<br />

Nann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Shanghai<br />

Wuhan<br />

Taiyuan<br />

Chengdu<br />

Nanj<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Hefei<br />

N<strong>in</strong>gbo<br />

Beij<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Guangzhou<br />

Shijiazhuang<br />

Chongq<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Guiyang<br />

Hangzhou<br />

Dalian<br />

Lanzhou<br />

Share <strong>of</strong> walk, bicycle and public transport<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>ese citizens prefer to choose walk, bicycle, and public transport as commuter compar<strong>in</strong>g with the<br />

developed country cities. However, there are challenges to keep such trends <strong>in</strong> the procedure <strong>of</strong><br />

economic development and private car <strong>in</strong>crease.


Challenges 7 :<br />

How to provide safer urban road and transport systems<br />

to promote the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the city’s competence?<br />

Traffic Death


Death <strong>in</strong> Ten Thousand Vehicles<br />

18<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

15.6<br />

Death/10000 vehicles<br />

1.01 1.43<br />

Japan Germany Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

Death <strong>in</strong> Hundred Thousand Population<br />

In 2006, 378,381 traffic accidents ,nearly 89,455 deaths,<br />

431,139 <strong>in</strong>juries,and direct economic loss 14.9 billion RMB.


Development stage <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

Field<br />

Pattern change feature<br />

Development idea<br />

Driv<strong>in</strong>g mechanism<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> management<br />

<strong>Urban</strong>-rural relationship<br />

Policy implementation<br />

Speed - quality<br />

S<strong>in</strong>gle Industry-Integrated<br />

economic transformation<br />

Government plan ---Market<br />

orientation<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> --- <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>Urban</strong> and rural<br />

development<br />

Government – Government and<br />

public participant


Government activities<br />

The scientific concept <strong>of</strong> development<br />

Harmonious society<br />

Resource efficient and environmental friendly society<br />

Institutional reform<br />

Public transport priority


Vision<br />

——<strong>Susta<strong>in</strong>able</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

An efficient, economical, harmonious, safe, and environmental<br />

friendly transport system suitable for the urban susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />

development<br />

1. To meet the needs <strong>of</strong> the national social and economy<br />

2. To reflect the stage character <strong>of</strong> urban transport<br />

development and different value and culture<br />

orientations <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese people<br />

3. The harmony between the resource-environment and<br />

economic-society development


Strategic Priorities<br />

1. Institution and Mechanism Innovation<br />

The new “M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transport</strong>” have been established by the state<br />

council on march, 2008. The responsibility <strong>of</strong> urban transport transferred<br />

to the new M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> from former M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Construction,<br />

which launched the first step to promote the comprehensive transport<br />

development <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />

Modified the city transport authority accord<strong>in</strong>g to the new MOT structure<br />

The coord<strong>in</strong>ation mechanism should be established for the separated<br />

management mode.


2. Prioritize Public <strong>Transport</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> and Suburb Area<br />

Establish the Public <strong>Transport</strong> Plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>Urban</strong> and Suburb<br />

Area<br />

Improve the <strong>in</strong>frastructure construction <strong>of</strong> public transport, especial <strong>in</strong><br />

BRT & Metro<br />

Establish the economic favorable policy cover urban and rural transport<br />

service<br />

Implement the access management between the urban street and<br />

highway, and ref<strong>in</strong>e the design guidel<strong>in</strong>e for the connect segment<br />

Accelerate the application <strong>of</strong> new technologies and <strong>in</strong>telligent<br />

technologies <strong>in</strong> Public <strong>Transport</strong>


<strong>Transport</strong> for all<br />

BRT <strong>in</strong> Beij<strong>in</strong>g<br />

State council mandates<br />

priority for public transport <strong>in</strong><br />

Dec. 2005<br />

BRT <strong>in</strong> J<strong>in</strong>an<br />

BRT <strong>in</strong> Hangzhou


3. Coord<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>Transport</strong> and Land Use ( TOD )<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> master plan and comprehensive transport plan should be<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrated and coord<strong>in</strong>ated.<br />

Integrated transport plann<strong>in</strong>g should be formulated based on the<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegration between urban and suburb areas, and between urban<br />

transport and <strong>in</strong>ter-city transport.<br />

Integrated transport bubs with <strong>in</strong>teroperability between different<br />

transport modes should be developed to ensure Transit Oriented<br />

Development (the TOD model).


4. Implement TDM, balanc<strong>in</strong>g demand and supply<br />

Guide the rational use <strong>of</strong> cars through <strong>in</strong>tegrated TDM measures,<br />

such as congestion charg<strong>in</strong>g and high park<strong>in</strong>g fees <strong>in</strong> the city<br />

center.<br />

Adopt the <strong>in</strong>tegrated TDM measures accord<strong>in</strong>g to traffic demands<br />

Regulate the spatial distribution <strong>of</strong> traffic demands through<br />

advanced traffic <strong>in</strong>formation service and price difference <strong>of</strong> tickets<br />

establish some policy to promote the implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

personal trips plann<strong>in</strong>g


Before<br />

Case: Limited the usage <strong>of</strong> private car <strong>in</strong> Beij<strong>in</strong>g<br />

—— “ Odd or Even number”<br />

33<br />

32<br />

31<br />

30<br />

29<br />

28<br />

27<br />

26<br />

30.5<br />

16.8<br />

32.1<br />

35.06<br />

Speed 速 度 (km/h)<br />

提 Increase 高 比 例 %<br />

rate (%)<br />

22.37<br />

26.9<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

After<br />

25<br />

5<br />

24<br />

The whole 全 路 网 network Rush 早 hour 高 峰 (Morn<strong>in</strong>g) Rush hour 晚 高 (Afternoon) 峰<br />

0


5. Resource Conservation and Environmental Friendly <strong>Transport</strong><br />

Improve environmental protection systems and strengthen<br />

governmental monitor<strong>in</strong>g and supervision capability<br />

Slow growth <strong>in</strong> transport energy use, especially oil consumption<br />

Conserve land resources<br />

Control air pollution to improve urban air quality and health


International Workshop on Integrated <strong>Transport</strong><br />

for <strong>Susta<strong>in</strong>able</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> Development<br />

Date and Venue:<br />

• December 8-10, 2008<br />

• Beij<strong>in</strong>g Cont<strong>in</strong>ental Grand Hotel, Beij<strong>in</strong>g Municipality, P. R. Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong> Themes:<br />

• Institutional Innovation reform<br />

• F<strong>in</strong>ance schemes<br />

• Integration <strong>of</strong> land use and transport<br />

• <strong>Transport</strong> demand management<br />

• Advanced technology applications,<br />

• L<strong>in</strong>ks between urban transport , health and environment.<br />

Welcome to attend this workshop!


Thanks for your attention

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!